Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

IDV oc confessions !

@identityvoc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

68subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003982576838
TypeChannel
Username@identityvoc
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 28 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/identityvoc

Growth

686968.59 Aug 2026, 20:15 — 69 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 00:02 — 69 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 19:44 — 68 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 20:1510 Aug 2026, 19:44
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68–69 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:4468-1
10 Aug 2026, 00:0269no change
9 Aug 2026, 20:1569first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
106.0%
avg views ÷ 68 subscribers
Avg views / post
72.1
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
26.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held16 (28 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,153
Reactions total295
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

295 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52944535764483795007224.4%
4414.9%
custom 52581687521339106593010.2%
custom 5440655173737276715299.83%
custom 5330326607888410674289.49%
custom 5332712844473427546289.49%
custom 5330183473808303971279.15%
🥰134.41%
🔥113.73%
🐳51.69%
🍓31.02%
👏20.678%
🎉10.339%
👀10.339%
💋10.339%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC42 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Твкв: обнажёнка, шрамы Практикуюсь в рисовании голых женщин.... ────── ꒰୨୧꒱ ────── › #тейк & @identityvoc ‹

custom 54406551737372767156custom 52944535764483795005custom 525816875213391065932custom 53301834738083039711

Signed РОБО–ТУАЛЕТ

8 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC47 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

не суди книгу побежали выползаю из норы спустя месяц😇 совершенно рандомный шмель в попу укусивший, что у этого Смайли нет ни толкового лора, значит ни толкового Альберта и пора бы это поправлять, потому что он почти единственный был без четкого скиншип концепта. получилась фентезийная аушечка с вайбами Алисы, где Джокер — безумный правитель и без того достаточно буйного региона, доставляющего хлопоты всем подряд, а

custom 533032660788841067411custom 53301834738083039717custom 529445357644837950062custom 54406551737372767151

Signed РОБО–ТУАЛЕТ

8 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC40 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @dreamyyumeidvPhoto

Не знаешь, где можешь поделиться своим селфшиппом или ОС/каноном по игре Identity V? Боишься осуждения со стороны фандома? Не волнуйся, в этом кф ты сможешь спокойно поделиться своим юме! ⭐️ ❤️ 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 ❤️ 🍭°❀⋆.ೃ࿔*:・°❀⋆.ೃ࿔*:・ ✨ 𝕒𝕕𝕞𝕚𝕟𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟: Кэри/Мэри 🦌🤍 — владелец Интегра/Тася/Мэггот 🐙🤍 — совладелец Генри/Джелоси 🎭🤍 – админ по ВП ✨ 𝕟𝕒𝕧𝕚𝕘𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟: правила дабл пост + тв/кв вп пост бот для тейков буст ✨ 𝕙𝕒𝕤𝕙𝕥𝕒𝕘𝕤:

1

Signed РОБО–ТУАЛЕТ

7 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC42 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Soul_Weaver_DailyPhoto

☆ Oh, hello! Welcome to — 🌟🌟🌟🌟⬜🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩 Здесь вы можете поделиться своим творчеством, связанным с милейшей Виолеттой или поглазеть на творчество других! 🤩 🦋 — Бот для тейков 🦋 — Вп пост 🦋 — Буст 🦋 — Хэштеги Лопата — Владелец ❤️ — Have a great time! ☆ ⬜

Signed РОБО–ТУАЛЕТ

7 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC53 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

𓏵ㅤㅤвопрос : что привлекает вас в чужих ос / сонах больше всего? ────── ꒰୨୧꒱ ────── › #опрос & @identityvoc ‹

custom 525816875213391065953custom 53303266078884106743custom 53327128444734275463

Signed РОБО–ТУАЛЕТ

6 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC59 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Кошкофос танцует Неанон Магготенко Савоярдовна ────── ꒰୨୧꒱ ────── › #тейк & @identityvoc ‹

custom 52581687521339106597custom 53327128444734275466custom 54406551737372767154custom 52944535764483795002custom 53303266078884106742

Signed ˚꩜ 𝐂𝐡𝐮𝐝𝐨

3 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC81 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Генфеи конфешн привет Неанон Генри я люблю Орфея кстати вы знали @OrpheusDarling ────── ꒰୨୧꒱ ────── › #тейк & @identityvoc ‹

custom 52944535764483795006🔥53🥰3

Signed ˚꩜ 𝐂𝐡𝐮𝐝𝐨

3 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC79 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Промахнулась пальцем и случайно купила эту рандомшу. Верните пазлы, я копила ну унитаз в руму Неанон @Jaegercave ────── ꒰୨୧꒱ ────── › #тейк & @identityvoc ‹

custom 529445357644837950010🥰75🔥1custom 52581687521339106591custom 53327128444734275461custom 54406551737372767151

Signed ˚꩜ 𝐂𝐡𝐮𝐝𝐨

2 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC69 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Боже как я люблю её Неанон Магготенко Савоярдовна ────── ꒰୨୧꒱ ────── › #тейк & @identityvoc ‹

custom 529445357644837950010custom 533018347380830397186🔥3🎉1

Signed ˚꩜ 𝐂𝐡𝐮𝐝𝐨

2 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC70 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Это кто это у нас такие птишке утютют Неанон Генри я постоянно забываю про канал @OrpheusDarling ────── ꒰୨୧꒱ ────── › #тейк & @identityvoc ‹

custom 533018347380830397154👏2🔥2👀1

Signed ˚꩜ 𝐂𝐡𝐮𝐝𝐨

1 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC87 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Очень яркий, сахарный скин с легким эффектом зловещей галины. Аж облачка спускаются, а земля приобретает сиреневый оттенок. Неужели мы вознеслись? ────── ꒰୨୧꒱ ────── › #тейк & @identityvoc ‹

custom 529445357644837950063🍓3🥰3custom 53301834738083039713💋1

Signed ˚꩜ 𝐂𝐡𝐮𝐝𝐨

31 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC90 views32 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Все еще никак не придумаю хантоверсию Даниэллы, но кажется в этот раз что-то да получилось🙏 Неанон @Jaegercave ────── ꒰୨୧꒱ ────── › #тейк & @identityvoc ‹

custom 529445357644837950013custom 53327128444734275467custom 54406551737372767155custom 533032660788841067443

Signed ˚꩜ 𝐂𝐡𝐮𝐝𝐨

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @identityvoc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 738,971 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IDV oc confessions !” (@identityvoc), 68 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/identityvoc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.