Channel
@identityhub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
186subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003783973883 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @identityhub @identityhub_ton |
| Created | 18 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/identityhub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 186 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 188 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 186 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 186 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
95 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 35.8% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 16.8% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 16.8% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 10.5% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 8.42% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 5.26% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏆 AppKit Motion Design Challenge: Winners $3000 prize pool, 42 submissions, 10 days, three winners. Huge thanks to everyone who shipped a motion concept for AppKit. Winners: 🥇 $1,500 — John (video) 🥈 $1,000 — Erz2121 (video) 🥉 $500 — BD Rex (video) Congrats to the winners. More contests dropping soon. Stay tuned. 👉 Browse all submissions
🔥5👍4❤2💩1
🚀 The new Launches cohort is live. 16 projects ship on Identity. From now until Sunday, the community decides who stands out. Here's the new cohort: • Handshake — agreements in the age of AI • TON Security Agent — AI-powered scam & fraud detection for TON • Rivyu Protocol — commitment & delivery protocol • Apps Father — no-code Telegram app builder • Gifts Factory — digital gifts for a billion Telegram users • Spea…
❤2👍2
🎬 AppKit Motion Challenge — $3,000 Prize Pool Create a short motion video for AppKit and help define the visual style for future TON DevRel content. 📌 What to do: - Create a 30–60 second motion video showcasing AppKit, TON's developer toolkit. - Think clean motion design, strong typography, and clear product storytelling. - Style should match the TON Developer Platform design language. 🏆 Prize Pool: $3,000 🗓 Subm…
❤8💩2
Quick update. This week, we delisted two projects from Launches after seeing strong signals of a large volume of manipulated votes. We reviewed the data carefully and concluded that we cannot trust the final results those projects received. Because of that, both projects have been removed from the cohort. We will also postpone the launch of the next Launches cohort to one week. Instead, we will use that time to i…
👍7👏6✍5💩2
Every Identity user gets a weekly clap budget for Launches The size of your budget depends on your reputation in the TON ecosystem. 🔵 Established users (3+ months in the ecosystem): • Platinum reputation — 50 claps/week • Gold — 40 claps/week • Silver — 30 claps/week • Bronze — 20 claps/week Your tier is based on the highest of your three reputation dimensions: TON Builder, TON Contributor, or TON Developer. 🟢 N…
💩5👍3😡3🔥2🤡2❤1🤝1
🚀 The first cohort of Launches is live. Today, 16 projects went live on Identity. From this point, the community decides who stands out. How it works: – You clap 👏 for the projects you like, and your voting power depends on your Identity reputation – No paid placements. Voting power = your reputation 🫴 – At the end of the week, the top projects will receive permanent badges on Identity 🏆 Here’s the first cohort: …
🔥7❤5👏2
Two new features are now live: 1) You can now add makers, your teammates, when submitting a project. Every maker listed will receive badges. 2) Submissions now support comments. Leave feedback, ask questions, or discuss projects directly on the submission page.
❤2
Almost one month since the alpha release. 1,000+ builders are already here. Keep building.
🔥2
Identity on Launches
❤4
We're assembling the first cohort now. Submit by March 27. Launch week starts March 30. 👉 Read the guide.
❤3
You build something. A few people notice. By next week, no one remembers. We built Launches to fix that. It's a new section on Identity where teams showcase their projects, collect community feedback, and compete for attention in weekly cohorts. https://identityhub.app/blog/introducing-launches
❤4
Identity pinned «Identity is the trust layer for the TON ecosystem. It turns public ecosystem activity into reputation. The platform reads public signals across the ecosystem — social accounts, code, badges, wallets, and community activity — and turns them into a transparent…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @identityhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 186,616 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Identity” (@identityhub), 186 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/identityhub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.