удивительно, но это тейк. продолжайте писать я не против: @idv_dlya_daynov_bot
🎃2
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪

Channel
@identity_conf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
378subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001997303367 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @identity_conf |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/identity_conf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 378 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 378 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 4 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
68 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎃 | 16 | 23.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 16.2% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 16.2% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 14.7% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 8.82% | |
| custom 5332311741772623357 | 5 | 7.35% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.47% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 30 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
удивительно, но это тейк. продолжайте писать я не против: @idv_dlya_daynov_bot
🎃2
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪
Гайс, привет. Вопросик Я очень люблю Ричарда и копаться в его лоре, оч крутой персонаж. НО я так и не смогла понять: этого бро фр подкинули/он лжеРичард(да называем его так лол) Или это тот же самый Ричард, личность которого максимально изменилась? Я придерживаюсь больше второй теории, могу объяснить почему, если кому-нибудь вдруг станет интересно поболтать на эту тему И я недавно вернулась в идв, где можно поподробн…
🎃2
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪
разбирайте свои роли
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪
подписчики давайте ролить я папочка дезире мелодис)
🤮1
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪
с принуждением
❤3
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪
ставьте лайк и скину фулл.
👍11❤2🎃2💘2👻1🔥1
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪
Мне катастрофически срочно нужно показать матадора которого я нарисовал я по нему сохну как школьница по старшику ТГК: https://t.me/aliotbaaan
❤🔥4🎃1
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪 #lianyalvr
Скетчи 🥺 вот тут их побольше, пишите кого еще нарисовать
❤🔥2💋2🎃1
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪 #lianyalvr
всем привет, я пришел закинуть вам свои бдсм игры с рандомами, где я либо фредерик, либо джозеф. я люблю джозериков, вы бы знали насколько!!!! я их обожаю, целую, люблю до невозможности!! неаное: дезоморфин джозерикович
🎃3❤2💋1🖕1
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪 #lianyalvr
иден ПАРАША
❤3🎃2
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪 #lianyalvr
а что если превратить этот тгк в свой инфо и потом хвастаться 400 подписчиками в своем инфо канале.
🎃2💋2
Signed .𖥔 ݁ ˖ 𝙨𝙤𝙪 #lianyalvr
^ω^ Тгк: @meowirlest.
🎃1💘1🔥1
Signed 𝙨𝙤𝙪
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @identity_conf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@identity_conf named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘪𝘥𝘷 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯!” (@identity_conf), 378 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/identity_conf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.