Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 14 of the 14 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 310 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 99 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,319–10,390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 14:01
10,328
-4
10 Nov 2026, 14:01
10,332
+5
8 Nov 2026, 23:47
10,327
-5
7 Nov 2026, 18:09
10,332
+1
6 Nov 2026, 14:09
10,331
-2
5 Nov 2026, 13:59
10,333
+2
3 Nov 2026, 15:57
10,331
-2
2 Nov 2026, 13:46
10,333
-3
1 Nov 2026, 16:59
10,336
-1
31 Oct 2026, 16:15
10,337
+1
30 Oct 2026, 16:00
10,336
-2
29 Oct 2026, 12:29
10,338
+2
28 Oct 2026, 08:35
10,336
-4
27 Oct 2026, 07:57
10,340
-2
26 Oct 2026, 11:15
10,342
-2
25 Oct 2026, 12:55
10,344
-1
24 Oct 2026, 13:46
10,345
-2
21 Oct 2026, 10:59
10,347
-4
20 Oct 2026, 10:06
10,351
-2
19 Oct 2026, 13:36
10,353
first reading
Engagement
314 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 10,328 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,640
94 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.347%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
94
of 314 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 91 of 94 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
314 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
153,987
Reactions total
527
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 10:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 03m
Average length
1m 51s
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,157 reactions across 294 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
390
18.1%
❤
276
12.8%
🕊
240
11.1%
🔥
150
6.95%
🤡
139
6.44%
😢
124
5.75%
👍
113
5.24%
👎
105
4.87%
😡
88
4.08%
😁
72
3.34%
🤮
69
3.20%
👏
47
2.18%
💩
47
2.18%
😱
38
1.76%
🤯
28
1.30%
🍾
25
1.16%
🤔
25
1.16%
🤣
22
1.02%
🙈
21
0.974%
🎉
15
0.695%
30 further kinds
123
5.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 310 of the 314 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,265 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 314 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 16 of 94 posts held from the last 30 days (17.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
В Ульяновске местная епархия РПЦ хочет вернуть здание, в котором находится стриптиз-клуб
Симбирская епархия РПЦ в Ульяновске намерена обратиться в прокуратуру с требованием проверить стриптиз-клуб, который открылся в 40 метрах от православного храма, пишет "Коммерсант-Волга".
Кроме того, епархия хочет вернуть церкви историческое здание бывшей духовной семинарии — клуб находится в пристройке к этому зданию.
Вернуть…
В Бугульме планируют установить памятник погибшим на войне против Украины
Глава города Дамир Фаттахов предложил членам топонимической комиссии подумать над самой идеей памятника.
🔸Татарстан занимает второе место в целом по стране (после Башкортостана) по количеству установленных погибших на войне против Украины. Согласно подсчетам "Idel.Реалии", с 24 февраля 2022 года уже погибло как минимум 10 607 уроженцев респуб…
Главные новости к этому часу:
🪖Сегодня 1723-й день полномасштабного российского вторжения в Украину.
🔸В Петербурге взорвался автомобиль с российским полковником.
По предварительным данным, он погиб на месте, сообщило издание "Фонтанка". Взрыв произошел на Колпинском шоссе в Шушарах.
🔸В Бруклине рядом со стройкой обрушилось трёхэтажное здание, сообщает AP.
Погибли как минимум два человека, 17 госпитализированы, …
Судебная хроника регионов Поволжья: обвинения в государственной измене, подготовке терактов и диверсий на объектах инфраструктуры.
Суд приговорил бывшего младшего сержанта из Кирова Никиту Богомолова к 17 годам заключения по обвинению в госизмене, дезертирстве и попытке вербовки в "Русский добровольческий корпус" (РДК).
По данным правозащитного проекта "Первый отдел", только за прошлый год по делам о шпионаже и гос…
Зоозащитницу из Саранска приговорили к шести годам заключения за три комментария в мессенджере Telegram
Центральный окружной военный суд в Екатеринбурге приговорил 44-летнюю Ольгу Софронову-Москвину из Саранска (Мордовия) к шести годам колонии по делу о призывах к экстремизму и терроризму из-за трех комментариев в Telegram’е. Об этом пишет "Медиазона".
Софроновой-Москвиной вменили два комментария о пытках фигуранто…
В Бугульме планируют установить памятник погибшим на войне против Украины
В Бугульме планируют установить памятник военным, погибшим на войны против Украины, сообщил глава города Дамир Фаттахов в своем Telegram-канале.
Он предложил членам топонимической комиссии подумать над самой идеей памятника.
— Образ солдата на постаменте сам по себе достоин уважения. Но мне хочется, чтобы у нашего мемориала была своя история…
На суде в Оренбурге обвиняемые в "организации массовых беспорядков" в Баймаке произнесли последнее слово
В Оренбургском областном суде завершился процесс над так называемыми организаторами массовых беспорядков в Баймаке в январе 2024 года — Юлаем Аюповым, Ильясом Байгускаровым, Артуром Мухаметовым, Ахметом Якуповым, Закиром Ахмединым, Саматом Давлетовым, Салаватом Елкибаевым, Данисом Гайсиным, Айнуром Хусаиновым и А…
У Уфы нет 22 млн рублей на ремонт сипайловской дамбы — мэрия
Ремонт и замена ограждений дамбы на набережной реки Уфы в Сипайлово обойдется в 22,3 млн руб, сообщает "Коммерсант-Уфа" со ссылкой на пресс-службу администрации города.
Ранее издание сообщало, что прокуратура через суд обязала власти Уфы в течение полутора лет облагородить набережные Белой и Уфы возле Монумента Дружбы и в Сипайлово. Мэрия тогда не согласи…
Суд в Набережных Челнах оштрафовал женщину на 30 тысяч рублей по делу о "дискредитации" армии из-за видео в Telegram
Набережночелнинский городской суд Татарстана 14 октября оштрафовал Веру Давыдову на 30 тысяч рублей по статье о "дискредитации" армии. Соответствующее постановление "Idel.Реалии" обнаружили в картотеке суда.
Согласно материалам дела, Давыдова опубликовала в Telegram’е некую видеозапись. Что было на …
"Он отвечал: дети растут, что я им скажу через 8 лет, хотел быть для детей не уголовником, а героем. Но судьба распорядилась иначе: жене даже результаты тестов ДНК не предоставили. Его похоронили в Усть-Омчуге, но точно ли похоронили его – родственники не знают".
Тенькинский округ Колымы добывает десятки тонн золота в год, но его поселки пустеют, молодежь уезжает, а многие мужчины отправляются на войну. В центре окр…
В Мордовии суд приговорил мужчину к двум годам принудительных работ по делу о реабилитации нацизма из-за комментариев в соцсетях
47-летнему жителю Мордовии вменили два эпизода по статье о реабилитации нацизма в интернете (ч. 4 ст. 354.1 УК РФ), сообщает пресс-служба СК по республике.
Согласно материалам дела, в ноябре 2021 года мужчина в одном из мессенджеров оставил комментарий "негативного содержания" о ветеране…
Главные новости к этому часу:
🪖Сегодня 1722-й день полномасштабного российского вторжения в Украину.
🔸Санкционный режим ЕС в отношении России работает хуже, чем нужно. К такому выводу пришла Европейская счётная палата, пишет Die Zeit.
По мнению аудиторов, одна из причин — в нечётких формулировках: каждая страна толкует их по-своему и вводит собственные исключения. Кроме того, механизмов контроля за соблюдением огр…
❤1🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 314 posts we hold for @idelrealii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@idelrealii edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 43 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Сердитая Чувашия @ChuvashiaDream · 122,678 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
RusNews ⭕️ @rusnews · 24,023 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026
Inkazan | Казань и Татарстан @inkazanischa · 29,267 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Idel.Реалии” (@idelrealii), 10,328 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/idelrealii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.