Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Iconware 📦

Channel

Iconware 📦

@iconware

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

61subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001265384684
TypeChannel
Username@iconware
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iconware

Growth

606160.57 August 2026 — 60 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60 subscribers15 August 2026 — 61 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:5761+1
10 Aug 2026, 05:0160no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:4460first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2028.6%
👍1521.4%
🔥1318.6%
❤‍🔥57.14%
🕊57.14%
😱34.29%
👀22.86%
👏22.86%
🤯22.86%
🎉11.43%
💔11.43%
🥰11.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2023 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2025, 20:04 UTC104 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Should this project get a second chance?

  1. Yes, a revival could potentially work under different conditions.79%
  2. No, there's no point reviving a dead project.21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Apr 2024, 15:03 UTC372 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Obsidian replacement icons that I made one day. Available in my personal channel. :-) https://t.me/mus1ce/118

🔥1

29 Feb 2024, 20:10 UTC327 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

So... Here we are, wow. It's been three years since I created this channel... Iconions, a channel where I poured my bare design skill into Icon Design. A channel where I could showcase my own icons for other eyes to see, a channel that I, have created. It's been sooo long, yet it feels like merely three months. I did not make many icons this year, but I truly appreciate all your support, despite my laziness. Witho

🔥41👍1

17 Jan 2024, 17:16 UTC375 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Okay, since I'm still working on the 2024 IW roadmap. Here's my question, should the iconware logo a rebrand or not? Please, let me know. :)

  1. Yes, the Logo needs a refresh.50%
  2. No, the Logo is good, but some changes could be done.40%
  3. No, the Logo is perfect, keep it as it is.10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jan 2024, 23:01 UTC354 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Might start posting long announcements on telegraph instead of this channel so I can avoid cluttering this channel with comically long announcements, yea.

👍1

15 Jan 2024, 22:57 UTC321 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

👋🏻 Hi guys, Qirkl's here, and I'm here to say that I'm pretty much back from my hiatus and might be returning making icons and designs continuously again! 🫂 Thank you everyone who patiently waited for this moment to come, I'm feeling much better compared to the last time and I'm ready to announce a lot of new plans for Iconware for the 2024 Year! 📆 For the following week, I'll start making a roadmap of the stuff th

3🎉1🔥1

31 Dec 2023, 16:50 UTC286 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @qirkldesignsPhoto

Here comes the part that's everyone's probably been waiting for... The end of year 2023. This year is probably the most memorable year I've experienced yet. The amount of the Stuff I've managed to accomplish during this year makes me very happy, especially during of the month of October and onwards. Hopefully, the next year will bring us much more of joy and greatness, I wish you all a very good, happy and a amazi

4

26 Nov 2023, 16:09 UTC403 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Hi guys, Qirkl's here. I couldn't handle it anymore and I will say that I'll be abandoning Telegram and my projects for some time. My mental health is going downhill due to Online School. I can't keep on being productive because I have 14 school tasks every day in the Online School, last year it was much easier since there wasn't too much of work in the school. Now I have to struggle to motivate myself because I'm un

🕊5😱1

26 Oct 2023, 20:04 UTC546 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

here's the icons I've made for the contest if you haven't checked the contests website.

9❤‍🔥2👍2

26 Oct 2023, 20:00 UTC466 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

=== ICON CONTEST RESULTS === 3rd Place achieved. 4 Icons made in total. 4 Days spent making the icons. gg wp ❤️

🔥5🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iconware. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Jul 2025, 20:04 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

Should this project get a second chance?

  1. Yes, a revival could potentially work under different conditions.79%
  2. No, there's no point reviving a dead project.21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jan 2024, 17:16 UTCFinal Results10 voters

Okay, since I'm still working on the 2024 IW roadmap. Here's my question, should the iconware logo a rebrand or not? Please, let me know. :)

  1. Yes, the Logo needs a refresh.50%
  2. No, the Logo is good, but some changes could be done.40%
  3. No, the Logo is perfect, keep it as it is.10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2023 to 20 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 548,940 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Iconware 📦” (@iconware), 61 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iconware.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.