Channel
@icfmuenchenladies
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
940subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001463775378 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @icfmuenchenladies |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/icfmuenchenladies |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:28 | 940 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 942 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 941 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:50 | 942 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 942 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
43 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 58.1% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 14.0% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ladies Prayer Hey beautiful Lady! Du bist eingeladen zum Start in den Morgen in der Gegenwart Jesu. Gemeinsam zur Ruhe kommen, unser Herz Jesus bringen, Kraft tanken - ohne Druck, ohne Perfektion - einfach echte Zeit mit offenen Herzen❤️❤️❤️. Egal, ob du voller Freude kommst oder gerade durch eine schwere Zeit gehst: du bist willkommen! Birgit bringt einen Impuls mit. ⏰Morgen - 6:30 Uhr 👉🏻 hier ist der Link
Signed Susan
Darüber will ich heute nachdenken:
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1
Signed Susan
Wie unterschiedlich wir zu Tieren stehen, zeigt sich bei manchen von uns daran, dass sie Tiere fast wie Familienmitglieder sehen. Andere sehen sie als zusätzliche Verantwortung, die man nicht braucht. Und viele denken irgendwo dazwischen. Die Art, wie wir Tiere in unser Leben einbinden und mit ihnen umgehen, sagt viel über uns selbst aus, mehr, als uns bewusst ist. Wie du sie behandelst, kann ein Spiegel deiner Mitme…
Signed Susan
Hallo geliebte Herzenstochter 👑, Du bist 💜-lich eingeladen in das Lob Gottes mit einzusteigen. ... von Gnade und Recht will ich singen, Dir Gott soll es klingen... 💜💜💜 Das gut einminütige Poetry möchte Dich ermutigen unseren wunderbaren Gott auch dann anzubeten, wenn es sich nicht danach anfühlt. 💜💜💜
❤1
File, posted without a caption
Ladies Prayer Hey Königstochter 👑! Du bist eingeladen zum Ladies Prayer, einem Start in den Morgen voller Frieden und Gottes Gegenwart. Lass uns gemeinsam bei Gott ankommen, Gott suchen und neue Kraft tanken. Du musst nichts leisten und nichts perfekt im Griff haben - komm einfach so, wie du bist. "Denn wo zwei oder drei in meinem Namen versammelt sind, da bin ich mitten unter ihnen." (Matt. 18, 20) Morgen wird K…
Signed Susan
💬✨ WELCHEN NAMEN GEBE ICH GOTT? Wie und wodurch wurde mein Blick auf ihn geprägt? Manchmal bewusst. Oft ganz unbewusst. Vielleicht ist er streng. Weit weg. Oder jemand, den ich beeindrucken möchte. Stimmt dieses Bild überhaupt? Bei der Ladies Lounge wollen wir gemeinsam neu entdecken, wer Jesus wirklich ist – und was sein Name über seinen Charakter verrät. Denn wenn wir erkennen, wer er ist, verändert das auch den…
Liebe Ladies ⏳ Der Countdown läuft... In wenigen Tagen startet das MEN'S CAMP, bei dem auch 50 Männer vom ICF München am Start sind! 🔥🔥🔥 Wir erwarten Großes: ❤️ Herzen, die heilen und verändert werden 💪 Neue Offenbarungen über Männlichkeit 💍 Ehe 👨👩👧👦 Familie 👑 Leiterschaft 🤲 Dienerschaft Warum posten wir das hier? WIR Frauen können unseren Männern den Rücken im Gebet stärken. Egal, ob du jemanden kennst, der …
🙏5❤3👍2
Signed Agnes
Frage und next Step:
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
MY MONDAY MOMENT Wir alle geraten ab und zu zwischen die Stühle: zwischen streitende Eltern, zwischen Partner und Kind, zwischen Meinungen von Kollegen oder Freunden. Man wird hineingezogen, soll Position beziehen, vermitteln, lösen. Schon in Korinth gab es dieses Lagerdenken. Doch Jesus ruft uns aus diesem inneren Zerren heraus. Du darfst den Konflikt Gott hinhalten. Du musst nicht richten, nicht reparieren, nicht …
❤10🔥3🙏2
Hey beautiful Lady! Du bist eingeladen zum Start in den Morgen in der Gegenwart Jesu. Gemeinsam zur Ruhe kommen, unser Herz Jesus bringen, Kraft tanken - ohne Druck, ohne Perfektion - einfach echte Zeit mit offenen Herzen❤️❤️❤️. Egal, ob du voller Freude kommst oder gerade durch eine schwere Zeit gehst: du bist willkommen! Kathrin bringt einen Impuls mit. ⏰Morgen - 6:30 Uhr 👉🏻 hier ist der Link
Signed Susan
Welchen Glaubensschritt willst du dir heute bewusst machen?
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Susan
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @icfmuenchenladies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Darüber will ich heute nachdenken:
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Frage und next Step:
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Welchen Glaubensschritt willst du dir heute bewusst machen?
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ideen für die Woche
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ICF München Ladies” (@icfmuenchenladies), 940 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/icfmuenchenladies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.