Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

赚哥发财日记

@ice88

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,178subscribers

+1,146 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002045057695
TypeChannel
Username@ice88
Description自由猫(Liberty Cats)联创频道 赚不完亏得完📓 @zhuange 用简单的话来说加密货币和NFT,并深入探讨去中心化金融(DeFi)。 关注赚哥推特X: https://x.com/ryu_lcat?s=21
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/ice88

Growth

321,17860510 Aug 2026, 15:00 — 32 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 01:51 — 1,178 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 02:00 — 1,178 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 15:0011 Aug 2026, 02:00
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1,146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:001,178no change
11 Aug 2026, 01:511,178+1,146
10 Aug 2026, 15:0032first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
20
Videos
1
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
583.3%
👍116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2025 to 7 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2025, 15:41 UTC192 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

我现在告诉你,比特币三年内可以达到50万美金,你现在会去买吗?

24 Sept 2025, 01:17 UTC214 viewsread 11 August 2026

第一轮牛市,2013年 12 月结束 第二轮牛市,2017年 12 月结束 第三轮牛市,2021年 11 月结束 第四轮牛市,2025年 __ 月结束

9 Sept 2025, 04:44 UTC238 viewsread 11 August 2026

作为web3人士,基本的常识要懂,钱包私匙一定要记好!我来考考你,你的钱包助记词第2,4,8,11位英文字母是什么?

28 Aug 2025, 15:22 UTC229 viewsread 11 August 2026

顶尖1%男性的12个习惯要点梳理: 1. 远离低价值女性。 2. 像国王守护王座一样守护时间。 3. 从不追逐女性,而是吸引她们。 4. 像训练盔甲一样训练身体。 5. 不争论,直接移除。 6. 建立多条收入来源。 7. 像僧侣一样掌握自律。 8. 乱局中保持冷静。 9. 避免从众,遵循自己的准则。 10. 掌握说“不”的艺术。 11. 不依赖动机,建立牢不可破的系统。 12. 明白自身存在就是力量。

22 Aug 2025, 10:17 UTC212 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

钱放在银行 vs. 钱放在链上 把钱存在银行,利率通常只有 1%–2%/年(在中国很多活期甚至低到0.25%)。 而且还有查封或冻结的风险。 同样的钱,如果换成USDT或USDC放在主流交易所(OKX、币安等),通过理财、质押、借贷,年化能轻松达到 8%–12%。 再进一步,把资金分散到 DeFi(去中心化金融),例如: • 稳定币借贷池(Aave、Compound):借出USDT/USDC,年化在 5%–10%; • 流动性挖矿/质押(Curve、Pendle、Maker):年化 10%–20%; • 新项目激励(如JUP空投):叠加收益,往往能把综合年化推到 15%以上。 换句话说: 银行存款=通货膨胀下的钱包缩水,而 链上理财=让钱成为“钱生钱”的工具。 ⸻ 钱必须流动起来 钱就像水,流动起来才能滋养自己。 • 你把钱存银行,结果是:银行拿去放贷,赚利差,你却只能拿一点点利息; • 你把钱换成稳定币,

1

12 Aug 2025, 20:39 UTC170 viewsread 11 August 2026

在b圈,线下社交意义其实不大。 大多数所谓的“聚会”“饭局”“圈子”“合影”,更多是情绪交换和面子游戏,而不是实质信息的交换。(项目方组织活动除外) 真正有价值的机会、信息、资源,往往不是在酒桌上获得的,而是来自长期的观察、判断和执行力。 币圈本质是一个信息极快、周期极短的市场,你能不能赚钱,核心在于认知与节奏,不在于认识谁。 很多人以为多认识几个所谓“大佬”就能提前知道消息,但现实是,真正的一手信息从来不会在公开场合流通,而能公开讲的,基本已经没有稀缺价值了。 更现实的一点是,币圈的信任体系极不稳定。今天可以一起喝酒、互加微信的人,明天可能就站在你的对立面,甚至把你当作流动性。 线下社交反而容易模糊你的判断,让你在该冷静做决定的时候,被情感绑架。 对多数人来说,不如把精力花在提升自己的研究能力、筛选信息的能力,以及执行计划的纪律性上。 市场才是真正的社交场,你和它相处得好,比和一百个圈内熟人混得熟要有用得多。

17 Jul 2025, 09:27 UTC350 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

新币担保现在火了,新币在这起事件中表现出的“查账失误、不作为、拉黑受害者、标签化攻击”等行为,背后的动机与缘由,赚哥认为可以从以下几个维度进行分析: 🔍 一、利益相关驱动:对需方的“过度信任”或“共谋”可能性 1. 与需方存在潜在关系或利益往来 • 某些担保方与“老客户”“返佣户”“亲信”之间建立了不对等的隐性联盟。 • 需方一方可能是“托”、“马甲”或有长期交易合作历史,新币因此偏袒甚至默许诈骗行为。 2. 资金落地优先于正义 • 担保方收到103776U后立即“确认到账”,对后续流程草率放行,暴露出其对资金安全性确认的标准极低。 • 一旦a专群和b专群发生押金冲突,两个专群的需方都声称押金是自己的,那么他们关心的核心,不再是交易是否公平,而是“免责”。 ⚖️ 二、制度设计缺陷+风险规避心态 1. 缺乏完备申诉机制,导致处理方式走极端 • 没有留给供方任何合理申诉通道。 • 出事后,为“避免被连坐”,新币选择“

15 Jul 2025, 03:54 UTC216 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

TRX由于其链上公开透明,是一只极易捕获和预估价值的币种。 各数据持续增长,如此亮眼的数据📊 让我们看得见、摸得着,心理踏实。

19 Jun 2025, 15:37 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 11 August 2026

Telegram创始人立下遗嘱,将171亿美元财富分配给6个孩子和100个精子捐赠所生子女 BlockBeats 消息,6 月 19 日,据《纽约邮报》报道,Telegram 创始人 Pavel Durov 表示,他希望财富留给通过精子捐赠所生的 100 个孩子。 这位亿万富翁已立下遗嘱,将其 171 亿美元的财富分配给与三位伴侣所生的六个孩子,以及过去 15 年间通过精子捐赠在 12 个国家所生的 100 个孩子,Durov 于周四在接受法国杂志采访时透露了这一消息。 「他们都是我的孩子,享有同等权利!我不希望他们在我去世后互相撕裂。」40 岁的 Durov 表示,他不希望他的孩子们在 30 年内动用他的财富。 🔗原文链接

14 Jun 2025, 09:07 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 11 August 2026

We’re here. Everyone’s waiting for good news? Well, here it is: the good news is—there’s no bad news. If we stop adding new features, the app could launch very soon. We plan to roll out a points-based activity system first, while continuing to develop Phase II in parallel. But if we insist on launching everything at once, the timeline will be significantly delayed. The details of the collectible toys have been car

6 Jun 2025, 09:55 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

马斯克和川普,这才几天,兄弟情说翻就翻。 前脚还在互相吹捧,后脚就开始投放“核弹级信息”。 在权力与资本的游戏里,政客与商人从来没有真朋友,有的只是阶段性的利益共振,和彼此还能利用的价值。 不过也见怪不怪,本质上人与人能在一起都是价值吸引或互换。 这也提醒我们一件事:不管是市场、项目、还是人际关系,只有利益真正一致时,关系才成立。 其余的,都是幻觉。

Signed 赚哥 @zhuange

5 Jun 2025, 08:11 UTC≈1,310 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

如果十年前 你拿着100万 - 如果你投了p to p 现在是0 买了恒大 现在是30万 买碧桂园 现在是60万 买创业板 现在是90万 买了上证指数 现在是95万 买了沪深300 现在是104万 买了国债 现在是140万 买了白银 现在是180万 买了标普500 现在是269万 买了黄金 是325万 买了腾讯是400万 买了纳斯达克是442万 买了小米是1500万 买了比亚迪是6000万 买了苹果是9800万 买了特斯拉是1.2亿 - 如果买的是比特币 现在是26个亿 - 所以人生最重要的是选择方向 而不是在错误的方向上奋勇前行 赚哥发财日记 💸

1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ice88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 454,766 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“赚哥发财日记” (@ice88), 1,178 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ice88.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.