Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for انجمن علمی انتقال خون ایران (IBTS)

Channel

انجمن علمی انتقال خون ایران (IBTS)

@ibts_ir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

247subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002557825844
TypeChannel
Username@ibts_ir
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ibts_ir

Growth

246247246.56 August 2026 — 246 subscribers7 August 2026 — 246 subscribers13 August 2026 — 247 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 246–247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:38247+1
7 Aug 2026, 02:31246no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:16246first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
151.4%
avg views ÷ 247 subscribers
Avg views / post
374
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.097%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total4,861
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
150.0%
👌150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC686 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

*سازمان غذا و داروی امریکا نخستین فرآورده پلاسمای خشک‌شده انجمادی را در آمریکا تأیید کرد* سازمان غذا و داروی آمریکا (FDA) نخستین فرآورده پلاسمای خشک‌شده انجمادی (Freeze-Dried Plasma) با نام Ezplaz را برای استفاده بالینی در ایالات متحده مجوز داد. این فرآورده برای بیماران بزرگسالی که به تزریق پلاسما نیاز دارند اما به سایر فرآورده‌های پلاسما دسترسی ندارند، از جمله بیماران دچار خونریزی شدید، نیازمند انتقال خون وسیع (Mas

👌1

31 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC485 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❤️روز ملی اهدای خون گرامی باد❤️ https://t.me/ibts_ir

1

30 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC442 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

🅰🅱🆎🅾 بیانیه انجمن علمی انتقال خون ایران به مناسبت روز ملی اهدای خون @ibts_ir

29 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC474 viewsread 7 August 2026

*میکروRNAها، نشانگرهای نوین برای ارزیابی کیفیت فرآورده‌های خونی ذخیره‌شده* یک مقاله مروری جدید نشان می‌دهد که میکروRNAها (miRNAs) می‌توانند به‌عنوان نشانگرهای مولکولی حساس برای ارزیابی کیفیت گلبول‌های قرمز، پلاکت‌ها و سایر فرآورده‌های خونی در طول دوره نگهداری مورد استفاده قرار گیرند. برخلاف شاخص‌های متداول مانند pH، درصد همولیز و سطح لاکتات که تنها بخشی از تغییرات ناشی از نگهداری را نشان می‌دهند، الگوی تغییرات miRNA

28 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC483 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

. 🅰️🅱️🆎️🅾️ از سری ژورنال کلاب‌های مجازی انجمن علمی انتقال خون ایران موضوع: مطالعه تطبیقی و برنامه راهبردی فرهنگ سازی اهدای خون #ژورنال_کلاب @ibts_ir

28 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC443 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

. 🅰️🅱️🆎️🅾️ این منبع، یک برنامه راهبردی برای ارتقای فرهنگ اهدای خون در ایران است که با الگوبرداری از تجربیات موفق جهانی (نظیر WHO، بریتانیا، آمریکا و ژاپن) تدوین شده است. هدف اصلی این مطالعه، عبور از کمپین‌های موقت زمانِ کمبود به سمت سرمایه‌گذاری بلندمدت در آموزش و ارتباطات مستمر است. این برنامه بر جذب نسل جوان از طریق طرح‌هایی مانند «سفیران دانشجویی» و گنجاندن مفاهیم اهدای خون در کتب درسی تأکید ویژه‌ای دارد. همچنین

28 Jul 2026, 11:52 UTC386 viewsread 7 August 2026

ISBT Live Journal Club: Acute unfavourable transfusion outcomes in children: Frequency and pattern in resource limited settings وبینار فراوانی و الگوی بروز عوارض حاد انتقال خون در کودکان در کشورهای کم‌برخوردار چهارشنبه، ۷ مرداد ماه ساعت ۱۶:۳۰ الی ۱۷:۳۰ به وقت تهران https://www.isbtweb.org/events/isbt-live-journal-club-acute-unfavourable-transfusion-outcomes-in-children-frequency-and-pattern-in-resource-limited-set

26 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC455 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

روز جهانی هپاتیت ۲۰۲۶؛ رفع موانع برای پایان دادن به هپاتیت‌های ویروسی روز جهانی هپاتیت هر سال در ۲۸ ژوئیه با هدف افزایش آگاهی درباره هپاتیت‌های ویروسی و اهمیت پیشگیری، تشخیص و درمان به‌موقع برگزار می‌شود. شعار امسال «هپاتیت؛ بیایید موانع را برداریم» (Hepatitis: Let’s Break It Down) بر حذف موانعی تأکید دارد که دسترسی افراد به خدمات سلامت را محدود می‌کنند. *وبینار منطقه‌ای WHO EMRO به مناسبت روز جهانی هپاتیت ۲۰۲۶* د

22 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC141 viewsread 7 August 2026

ISBT Webinar: Dr Jeremy Cannon answers your questions about how to prepare your hospital for a mass casualty event وبینار: پاسخ به پرسش‌های شما درباره آمادگی بیمارستان‌ها برای حوادث با تلفات انبوه پنج شنبه، ۱ مرداد ماه ساعت ۱۷:۳۰ الی ۱۹:۰۰ به وقت تهران https://www.isbtweb.org/events/isbt-webinar-dr-jeremy-cannon-answers-your-questions-about-how-to-prepare-your-hospital-for-a-mass-casualty-event.html @کانال‌بین‌ال

21 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC149 viewsread 7 August 2026

*هوش مصنوعی، ابزاری نوین برای پیش‌بینی نیاز به تزریق خون در جراحی* پژوهشگران دانشگاه کالیفرنیا در سان‌فرانسیسکو (UCSF) با استفاده از مدل هوش مصنوعی Smart Match توانستند نیاز بیماران به تزریق گلبول قرمز مرتبط با عمل جراحی را با دقت بالایی پیش‌بینی کنند؛ اقدامی که می‌تواند به کاهش هزینه‌ها، مدیریت بهتر ذخایر خون و افزایش ایمنی بیماران کمک کند. برای توسعه این مدل، از داده‌های بیش از ۲۳۵ هزار عمل جراحی انتخابی بزرگسالا

19 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC143 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

🅰️🅱️🆎️🅾️ دستورالعمل راهنمای جامع عملیاتی برای مدیریت تأمین و انتقال خون در شرایط جنگ و بحران 🅰️🅱️🆎️🅾️ @ibts_ir

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ibts_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 318,956 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“انجمن علمی انتقال خون ایران (IBTS)” (@ibts_ir), 247 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ibts_ir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.