- IELTS 8(Writing 7.5 - 4x)
- work at Everest 🇬🇧
Valuable and essential content for learning English and IELTS 📚
Direct link to me: @ibrohimyoqubov 🎯
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ibrohimyoqubov_?igsh=cHhvNGN6ZD
Created
Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 284–286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 08:20
285
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:26
285
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
62.5%
avg views ÷ 285 subscribers
Avg views / post
178
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
20 (14 July 2026 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
2,493
Reactions total
87
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
421
Videos
47
Links
72
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 27s
Average length
1m 27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
134 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
38
28.4%
❤
31
23.1%
👍
18
13.4%
🆒
15
11.2%
💯
8
5.97%
👏
7
5.22%
✍
4
2.99%
🤔
4
2.99%
🤯
3
2.24%
❤🔥
2
1.49%
👀
2
1.49%
custom 5373067498193166118
1
0.746%
😁
1
0.746%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
This is just me asking you to ignore other people's accomplishments in social media. About 263 people sent me the news about some second grader getting an overall 7.0 or something.
We are happy for the kid but this news should be totally irrelevant for an average teenager or young adult pursuing IELTS. He probably has a supportive environment and was taught English from an incredibly young age.
Focus on yourself pl…
#masterpiece #task_1 #table
A potentially 8+ report by me!
The tables compare the percentages of people who rated six aspects of life in a city as good, neither good nor bad, or bad in surveys conducted in 1980 and 2010.
Overall, positive ratings were considerably higher than negative ones for every aspect in both years. While education and employment became more favourably rated over time, satisfaction with healt…
#masterpiece #task_2
It is increasingly common these days that sporting events are usually used as places where big organisations mostly publicise their products. This phenomenon is unwelcome in many cases, with people talking about its negative aspects. While there are several detrimental influences of this trend, a fundamental reason lies behind it, which is the source of revenue for such companies. However, I th…
Juda foydali podcast bo'libdi! Teacher ko'pgina experiencelarni share qilibdilar.
P/s: Especially for those losing interest in learning English and studying IELTS)
@ibrohimielts
🎯 Muvaffaqiyatsizliklarim muvaffaqiyatimga sabab bo‘ldi! | Rixsitilla Shukrullayev
Bugunga qadar 400 dan ortiq 7.0+ natija chiqargan ustoz o‘qitishda qanday metodlarni qo‘llaydi? O‘quvchilariga nisbatan qattiqqo‘lmi yoki qo‘llab-quvvatlovchi pozitsiyada?
👀 Qolaversa, kandidatlarga reading, speaking, writing, speaking‘dagi muammolarga qanday yechim taklif qiladi? Barcha savolga javob — intervyuda!
KO‘RAMIZ:
📱 https…
#masterpiece #task_1 #bar_chart
A very lovely report!
The bar chart compares the percentage of men, women, and children who ate the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006, and 2010.
Overall, women consistently topped this chart in terms of consumption. Also, regardless of their gender and age, the proportion of people eating the recommended amount of food increased moderately, despite slig…
#masterpiece #task_1 #table
Very solid 8+ piece of writing with three body paragraphs)
The table compares information about the number of physicians, hospital beds per 1000 people and average stays in hospitals in three European countries over three periods: 1980, 1990 and 2000.
Overall, Sweden consistently recorded the highest figures for physicians, hospital beds and average hospital stays throughout the period.…
1. Do you prefer living in an old building or a modern house?
2. Should old buildings be preserved?
3. Are there any old buildings you want to see in the future?
4. What aspect of culture do old buildings reflect?
5. How do old buildings affect the appearance of a place?
@ibrohimielts
#speaking #part_1
PART 1 | TOPIC-3
OLD BUILDINGS
Sample answers in a pdf file.
Audio answers are also presented below(a nice way to improve pronunciation)!
More knowledge is here 👇
@ibrohimielts
#masterpiece #task_1 #map
Well-written task 1 map by me, which I think is well-worth 8.5)
The maps illustrate plans of the ground floor of an unspecified building in three different time periods: 1958-1984, 1985-2000 and 2001-present.
Overall, the ground floor has served three different purposes: an office from 1954 to 1985, an apartment from 1985 to 2000, and a flower shop from 2001 to the present day. Regarding …
✍2❤2👀2🔥2🆒2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ibrohimielts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ibrohimielts named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ibrohimeitls named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ibrohim's IELTS” (@ibrohimielts), 285 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ibrohimielts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
