Channel
@ibratdebatetashkentregion
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002662008754 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ibratdebatetashkentregion |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ibratdebatetashkentregion |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 42 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 41 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 42 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 41 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 41 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 12 | 52.2% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 4.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 4 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭐️“Top Universitetlar” marafonining bugungi mehmoni — Johns Hopkins University talabasi, IELTS 9, SAT 1600 natijalari sohibi — Bobirjon Bakhtiyorov! 🎓Bugun Bobirjon sizning savollaringizga javob beradi hamda Top universitetlarga kirish bo‘yicha eng nozik sirlarni siz bilan bo‘lishadi. ⚠️Marafonda qanday qatnashish haqida ushbu videoda batafsil bilib olishingiz mumkin. 📆 Barchani bugun, 4-mart soat 19:00 da, Ibrat …
👏2🔥1🖕1
💎 HEY, tayyormisan? Chunki Ibrat Debate Tournament keyingi bosqichi yaqin! Ushbu bosqichda g‘olib bo‘lgan jamoalar Ibrat Debate Respublika bosqichiga yo‘l oladi 🚀 Bu yerda: 🔥fikrlar to‘qnashadi 🧠miyang full ishlaydi 🎤nutqing level up bo‘ladi 📅8-fevral ⏰10:30 📍Nurafshon, Nuroniylar maskani 📌 Ishtirok etish uchun oldindan ro‘yxatdan o‘tish majburiy 👉 Registration link: form Oddiy bahs emas - bu Ibrat Debate Kuza…
🔥5👍2❤1🖕1
🏆“Ibrat debate tournament” haqida eng koʻp berilayotgan savollar: 1. Jamoada nechi kishi boʻlishi kerak? — Qatʼiy 2 kishi qatnashishi shart ( yana 1 kishi zahiraga olinishi mumkin) 2. Bir o’zim qatnashsam boʻladimi? — Yo’q, do’stingizni taklif qilgan holda qatnashsangiz bo’ladi. 3. Hozirda o’qishim sababli Toshkent shahrida yashayman, lekin aslida doimiy yashash manzilim boshqa joyda. Toshkent shahar nomidan qatna…
🔥4⚡1
🥳Siz uzoq kutgan yangilik keldi... 🏆O'zbekiston tarixida ilk bor Ibrat Debate “Nationwide Tournament” ga start bermoqda. Bu tournament har doimgi debatelardan farqli o'laroq katta miqiyosda bo'lib o'tilishi kutilmoqda 🤩. 🗓 31-yanvar, 1- va 2-fevral kunlari yurtimizning barcha viloyat markazlarida tournament bo’lib o’tishi rejalashtirilmoqda. Hudud bosqichlarida g’olib bo’lgan jamoalar RESPUBLIKA bosqichiga yo'llanm…
🔥1
Also, guess "what is something big" that is coming? We are curious to hear your opinion 🤩
🔥1
~ Waited so long, yeah? 😁 Shoowww your maximum active. 300 fire 🔥 and we are going to announce something very big 🤫 @ibratdebate
🆒1
Ibrat Debate Success Rubrics Ep:2 😇 Dunyoning Top Universitetlari, xalqaro dasturlar va nufuzli tanlovlarda yutuqlarga erishgan Ibrat Debate jamoa a’zolarini siz azizlarga tanishtirishga qaror qildik! 1. Sadriddinova Bonu — Uzbekistan–China 2025–2026 Exchange Student, Full Scholarship 2. Dilobar Abduvaxobova — Honours List Awardee, Immerse Education Essay Competition 3. Akbarova Mushtariy — Republican Children’s …
👍Bugun Ibrat Debate uchun oddiy kun emas bu uning tarixiga oltin harflar bilan bitiladigan eng muhim sanalardan biri! 🔹Bundan 2 yil avval, aynan shu kunda, Ibrat Debate o‘zining ilk qadamlarini tashlagan edi. O‘sha kundan buyon bu loyihada o‘sish, rivojlanish va yutuqlar yo‘lidan dadil odimlab kelmoqda. Albatta, yo‘lda kichik sinovlar ham bo‘ldi, ammo ular bizni to‘xtatmadi — aksincha, yanada kuchli qildi. 🗓 2025-y…
❤1❤🔥1
Finally, two days left until ‘Big day’ @ibratdebate
Channel photo updated
Tashkent region Tashkent district
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ibratdebatetashkentregion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What makes an argument strong?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What is the final step in a debate speech?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How many answers did you get correct out of 4?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 4 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ibrat debate Tashkent region” (@ibratdebatetashkentregion), 42 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ibratdebatetashkentregion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.