Channel
@iatethepainter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
145subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002257597614 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iatethepainter |
| Description | It was consensual |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iatethepainter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 145 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 145 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (5 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,563 |
| Reactions total | 240 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
309 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 195 | 63.1% | |
| 🤩 | 51 | 16.5% | |
| 💋 | 37 | 12.0% | |
| 🍌 | 17 | 5.50% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 1.29% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 0.647% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.647% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.324% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iatethepainter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Нарисовали с Христофором по мини-комиксу, в рамках нашего личного челленджа. Выкладываю скетч, доведу до ума в спокойном темпе. История правдивая, я (как истинный жуткий сталкер) планировала затянуть в свои сети любимого художника, о котором почти ничего не знала. Как видите, мои зловещие планы увенчались успехом. Мвахаха!
❤23🤩5💋4
Ходили с мужем в зайкафе, порисовали наброски. Кролики - нежнейшие, милейшие, прекраснейшие животные, призываю всех и каждого любить кроликов и по возможности угощать их наивкуснейшим луговым сеном. #отвратительные_картиночки
❤22💋4🤩4
Брелоки со smartschoolboy9 готовы! Цена вопроса - 700 рублей + доставка (в Москве могу передать лично). Порадуйте себя омерзительным немолодым мужчиной! Добавьте своему имиджу пикантную капельку извращенного безумия! @Gargoolia #отвратительные_товары
🤩9❤5💋5🌭1
Дизайн для шейкера! Это будет брелок с перекатывающимися внутри опарышами! #отвратительные_картиночки
🤩13❤10💋6
«Долго думай, стоит ли становиться другом тому или этому, но решившись, принимай друга всей душой и говори с ним так же смело, как с собою самим» - Сенека. #отвратительные_картиночки
❤19🤩2💋1
Дизайн для гуро-брелока. Маленькое бессмертное существо с феноменальной регенерацией тканей, которое притворяется милым, чтобы поработить человечество. И размножается делением. #отвратительные_картиночки
❤25🍌1🤝1
Прекрасная безжалостная дама, жена бога войны и кровожадная дракониха, способная своим обжигающе-ледяным дыханием уничтожать легионы. #отвратительные_картиночки
❤20🤩4💋3
Покатались на поезде до Казани! Хехехехехе! #отвратительные_картиночки
🍌16❤10💋7
Атака на https://t.me/LulaKebabishka Чудесные зверолюды для чудесного человекочеловека! #artfight #отвратительные_картиночки
❤15👀4🤩1
И ещё #artfight Очень уж понравилась эта безумная собака… #отвратительные_картиночки
❤18💋3🌭1
Еще одна атака на #artfight Булльтерьерица для https://www.instagram.com/crayonzii #отвратительные_картиночки
❤21💊2💋1
Две атаки на артфайт. Первая - грустный вампир Дориан для https://t.me/witchsciencedraw , вторая для абсолютно случайного пользователя (иностранца? Школьника? Понятия не имею). В любом случае, постараюсь рисовать больше и, может быть, даже работы в цвете. #airtight #отвратительные_картиночки
🤩13❤7💋3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @iatethepainter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 647,206 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“I ate the painter” (@iatethepainter), 145 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iatethepainter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.