Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CALLADRIUS

@iamcalladrius

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

65subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001474367101
TypeChannel
Username@iamcalladrius
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/iamcalladrius

Growth

6511 Aug 2026, 21:18 — 65 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:30 — 65 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:1811 Aug 2026, 21:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64–66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:3065no change
11 Aug 2026, 21:1865first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 14 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
130.8%
avg views ÷ 65 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
14.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held12 (14 April 202619 July 2026)
Views total85
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
131
Videos
14
Links
28

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 13s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54519587674511405633830.4%
custom 54494685969525078593628.8%
2016.0%
custom 537086971188819401286.40%
👾75.60%
custom 526254382915992796554.00%
custom 546996315439183373243.20%
custom 542488544110078242032.40%
🔥21.60%
custom 543413839838420043410.8%
🥰10.8%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iamcalladrius. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 April 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC85 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Привет! Я использую WhatsApp. Открыт приём ватермарок для шоукейса голосовухи отправлять в лс тгк приму не все

custom 54519587674511405637

19 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTCviews —5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52625438291599279655

12 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC101 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @sdvig_po_baze

Хочу поделиться самыми влиятельными музыкальными продюсерами именно для меня. Люди влияние которых на меня, как на музыкального продюсера, невозможно переоценить. Заодно расскажу, какие ГЛАВНЫЕ вещи я для себя усвоил у конкретно каждого из них (как технические так и философское). 1) Skrillex (база) - Наблюдая больше 15 лет за Сони, я усвоил две главные вещи. Одна техническая, другая больше экзистенциальная. Начну с

custom 53708697118881940124

10 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC95 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ого я сабрал стак подпищиков спасиба

custom 544946859695250785911

29 Jun 2026, 00:49 UTC131 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @kalpostFile

мы делаем вкуснятинку💥

custom 54494685969525078599custom 54519587674511405631custom 54699631543918337321

8 Jun 2026, 11:11 UTC202 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

посидел ща пару часов без света вспомнил как карандаш держать

custom 545195876745114056314custom 53708697118881940123custom 54494685969525078593

25 May 2026, 05:58 UTC191 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 54519587674511405639

12 May 2026, 05:01 UTC211 views9 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @erstieprojectVideo

"everything you build is going under" 😞

custom 54519587674511405637custom 53708697118881940121custom 54494685969525078591

4 May 2026, 21:59 UTC241 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 544946859695250785912custom 54248854411007824203custom 54699631543918337323custom 54341383983842004341

15 Apr 2026, 00:39 UTC327 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ТРЕКЛИСТ СЕТА ПРОСИЛИ КОРОЧ. НУ ПОКА ВОТ ТАК, ДА. 1. CALLADRIUS & Dimentros - Railbreaker Intro 2. CALLADRIUS & MOULDD - SPECTRE (WIP) 3. R7GE STONE & Dimentros - INTERGALACTIC EXPRESS 4. PhaseOne & Make Them Suffer - SOS (CALLADRIUS & MOULDD Remix) 5. clwdy. - fragments of who i never was (CALLADRIUS Remix) 6. Sharks - Sleepwalker 7. Sharks & Dyatic - Morpha 8. BAW & RUSHKID - eversor 9. BAW & Vistuh - without you

8🔥2👾1

14 Apr 2026, 00:32 UTC190 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ПАЖРАЛ В КЕИФСИИИИИИИ

12

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @iamcalladrius. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 944,067 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CALLADRIUS” (@iamcalladrius), 65 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iamcalladrius.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.