Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Inform Me

Channel

Inform Me

@iam_informed

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

358subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001964860298
TypeChannel
Username@iam_informed
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iam_informed

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

358359358.56 August 2026 — 359 subscribers6 August 2026 — 359 subscribers14 August 2026 — 358 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 358–359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:25358-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:03359no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:45359first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3760.7%
😢914.8%
👎58.20%
👍46.56%
💯23.28%
🔥23.28%
👏11.64%
🤬11.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2025 to 17 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2025, 05:53 UTC≈3,030 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Did you hear about the recent U.S. Senate hearing, where attorney Aaron Siri presented data from an unpublished study comparing health outcomes in vaccinated vs unvaccinated children. Reported outcomes included: • 453% more neurological disorders in vaccinated children • 496% more autoimmune disease • 329% more asthma • 203% more atopic disease • By age 10: 57% of vaccinated children were chronically ill vs 17%

4👍2🔥2👏1

11 Jul 2025, 01:19 UTC341 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @parentswithquestionsPhoto

🛡️ Final Act of Courage for Our Kids 🚨The TGA has quietly withdrawn its recommendation for COVID vaccines in healthy kids under 18 — admitting the risks outweigh the benefits.But doctors and pharmacists haven’t been told. That means Aussie kids could still be getting this shot. We’ve created two respectful letters — one for your doctor, one for your pharmacist. It’s simple: ✅ Print ✍️ Sign 📬 Send Do it for the ch

4

23 Jun 2025, 22:49 UTC≈1,990 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

The real MVP (Most Valuable player) is our website! Our greatest tool full of free resources for the community to find information on the childhood immunisation schedule that maybe they haven’t seen before… that enables families to make FULLY INFORMED choices around their children’s health! Check it out today! https://inform-me.org

10

10 Jun 2025, 05:45 UTC≈2,160 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

As a small team, we’re streamlining our communication channels to focus on where we can engage most effectively. You can now stay connected with us on: 🔸 Instagram: @iam_informed 🔸 X (formerly Twitter): @iam_informed 🔸 Facebook: Inform Me For all our resources and updates, visit our website: https://inform-me.org Thank you for your continued support and understanding as we make this transition. #InformMe #Inform

👎5😢5🤬1

9 Jun 2025, 21:24 UTC741 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚨 JUST RELEASED | Module Four: Diphtheria — Then and Now We’ve all heard the narrative — but what if the story of diphtheria isn’t as clear-cut as we were told? 🧡 In our newest module, we revisit the history of diphtheria with Dr. Brian Hooker and author Greg Beattie, unpacking the real data behind the disease, the vaccine, and the public health improvements that came long before it. Inside this free video series,

2

7 Jun 2025, 22:42 UTC≈1,340 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Volunteer With Heart — Help Hold the Space for Real Dialogue Our social platforms are growing rapidly — and so is the need for grounded, respectful community engagement. We’re seeking a volunteer with a calm, thoughtful presence to help moderate comments, support our audience, and uphold the values of open dialogue and informed consent. You’ll work closely with our core team, receive full training and support, and

3

6 Jun 2025, 22:27 UTC≈1,400 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

We’re Looking for You — Join the Movement for Informed Consent At Inform Me, we believe every person deserves access to transparent, evidence-based vaccine education — and that starts with a team powered by heart, purpose, and skill. We’re currently expanding our volunteer crew and looking for passionate individuals to assist with research, admin, and logistics behind the scenes. These roles are vital to keeping ou

4

6 Jun 2025, 06:24 UTC191 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

“In a significant yet understated update, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has acknowledged that the risks associated with COVID-19 vaccination in healthy children now outweigh the benefits. This admission, quietly posted on their website without a formal announcement, raises questions about the initial push for widespread vaccination among children and the transparency of health authorities.” For a deeper

7

6 Jun 2025, 02:49 UTC674 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#Breaking:🚨 The Australian Government has quietly withdrawn its recommendation for COVID-19 vaccination in healthy children and adolescents under 18. No press conference. No statement to parents. No media coverage. Just quietly removed — sometime around 2 May 2025. Why the silence on such a significant shift? When public health advice changes, families deserve clear communication — not quiet edits. 🧡 At Inform Me

4 Jun 2025, 21:48 UTC619 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Calling mRNA “just another vaccine” is like calling a spaceship a bicycle. The mechanism is different. The risks are different. And the lack of long-term data should concern every parent. Explore resources to help your family make confident, informed decisions: https://inform-me.org/

💯21

2 Jun 2025, 23:15 UTC644 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

When underreporting is the norm, we need to rethink what “rare” really means. Australia’s own adverse event system could be capturing just a fraction of the harm. Are you okay with those odds? Check out the fact sheet in the COVID module to read the data. Explore resources to help your family make confident, informed decisions: https://inform-me.org/

28 May 2025, 21:39 UTC738 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

A gripping film that breaks the silence around COVID policy, censorship, and the personal cost of blind obedience. Watch our exclusive interview with filmmaker Todd Michael Harris 🔗 https://inform-me.org/

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @iam_informed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 999,339 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Inform Me” (@iam_informed), 358 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iam_informed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.