Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Я принял хаос.🧿

Channel

Я принял хаос.🧿

@iacceptchaos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

48subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002372944915
TypeChannel
Username@iacceptchaos
DescriptionПосты в максимально рандомное время, рисую для себя 💥
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/iacceptchaos

Growth

487 August 2026 — 48 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47–49 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:0348no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:2648first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
119.8%
avg views ÷ 48 subscribers
Avg views / post
57.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
30.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held15 (10 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total115
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
158
Videos
1
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

231 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓8436.4%
custom 54295358942499477212410.4%
🐳208.66%
custom 5456242993033913361198.23%
custom 5299030624311456556166.93%
custom 5352961944531787511114.76%
custom 5298565891670160466104.33%
custom 5927073809285780435104.33%
custom 536619323982717606162.60%
custom 544078413872026528252.16%
custom 545427427451470707652.16%
custom 519750009710499418541.73%
custom 536414860776101251241.73%
custom 542930960101305658241.73%
custom 531893666385704945631.30%
custom 528102380641927074720.866%
custom 519081965343320332210.433%
custom 540003619484523514710.433%
🎉10.433%
💅10.433%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC65 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

✨ В твиттере художники такое заполняют, решил тоже сделать. #pokemon

custom 59270738092857804358custom 54542742745147070763🍓1🐳1custom 53529619445317875111custom 54000361948452351471

3 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC50 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Каждую ночь он показывает мне плохие сны, уже как больше месяца. Но виноват в этом только я. С др моего же персонажа.

custom 535296194453178751110🍓4custom 51975000971049941852custom 54542742745147070762🐳1custom 59270738092857804351

17 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC129 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🧸 Референс для Львёнка. Не знаю, вроде прикольно оформил, а вроде хз.

custom 529903062431145655611🍓3custom 51975000971049941852🐳1custom 59270738092857804351

12 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC175 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚬 Я походу и шакал, и упоротый. > Соавтор < > Тт видос < upd.: не совсем понятно, но в комменты кинул, что это должно было быть...

🍓7custom 53189366638570494563🐳1💅1custom 52985658916701604661

11 Jul 2026, 00:03 UTC147 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⛓️ Я не думал что это выльется в практику геометрии. #type_null #pokemon

🍓4custom 52985658916701604663custom 52990306243114565562🐳1custom 51908196534332033221

10 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC104 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @zibzalublaPhoto

#модель Моделька для замечательного челвоека Может мне и камишки на арты открыть хм хм??

🍓6custom 52985658916701604662custom 52990306243114565562🐳1

10 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

КРАСИВОЕ ЧУДЕСНОЕ ЗЛОБНОЕ

🍓3🐳1

9 Jul 2026, 21:50 UTC111 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🐉 Щас бы быть тренером драконьего типа, а не вот это вот всё. #pokemon #dragapult #tyrantrum

🍓8custom 52985658916701604664custom 54407841387202652824🐳1

8 Jul 2026, 01:27 UTC107 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

◼️

🍓7custom 54562429930339133615🐳2custom 52810238064192707472custom 52990306243114565561custom 54295358942499477211custom 54407841387202652821

29 Jun 2026, 19:01 UTC144 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🧸 С ними мне чуть-чуть легче.

custom 542953589424994772110custom 53661932398271760615🍓4custom 54562429930339133613🐳1

28 Jun 2026, 15:49 UTC519 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📝 Гифты потому что хотел порендерить рога Авторы: жаренный гвоздь, ядовитый и летучий, дохуя важный, слепошара #PhightingOc

custom 54295358942499477218🍓3🐳2

26 Jun 2026, 13:22 UTC133 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @SeraphlaserBlog_phbPhoto

⬜🔺🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🔺 ♟ 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕊𝔽𝕆𝕋ℍ'𝕤 𝕞𝕖𝕤𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕘𝕖𝕣 𝕨𝕒𝕟𝕥𝕤 𝕥𝕠 𝕒𝕟𝕤𝕨𝕖𝕣: 👁️ Есть ли у вас питомец? Если нет, хотели бы вы его завести? Или вам не разрешают? 👁️ Добрый вечер, у вас есть питомец? Если есть, то расскажите ⬜ ✂️🔺 Дᴀвно оҕ этом смᴇᴘтныᴇ χотят ʏзнᴀть. И, покᴀ своҕодноᴇ ᴇсть вᴘᴇмя, rотов ᴇᴇ я покᴀзᴀть. ⬜ ✂️🔺 Нᴇ нᴀзовᴇωь ᴇᴇ питомųᴇм. Помоպниųᴀ онᴀ, моя чʏдᴇснᴀя нᴀпᴀᴘниųᴀ. Былᴀ совсᴇм однᴀ пᴘи жизни это чʏдо, сʏдьҕᴀ оҕоωлᴀся

🍓5custom 54295358942499477213🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @iacceptchaos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 417,911 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Я принял хаос.🧿” (@iacceptchaos), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iacceptchaos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.