لیوان مذکور و اشک و آه و فغان :))))))
❤9

Channel
@i_mahlaqa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
397subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001342680118 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @i_mahlaqa |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/i_mahlaqa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 397 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:10 | 396 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 394 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 394 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 677 |
| Reactions total | 75 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
162 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 60 | 37.0% | |
| 💔 | 40 | 24.7% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 16.0% | |
| 🤣 | 24 | 14.8% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 6.17% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لیوان مذکور و اشک و آه و فغان :))))))
❤9
به اینم معتقد هستم که بچه واقعا روزی خودش رو میاره. یعنی یه رزق هایی بهت میرسه که اصلا قبلا وجود نداشت. یه برکتهایی به زندگیت جاری میشه که خودت تعجب میکنی! اما بالاخره باید امنیت مالی هم داشته باشی.🫠
👍11
کلاً من طرفدار اینم که یا بچه نیاریم٫ یا اگر تصمیم گرفتیم بچهدار بشیم، تا جایی که از نظر روحی، روانی و مالی توانش رو داریم، نذاریم بچهمون تکفرزند بمونه. البته میدونم هر خانواده شرایط خودش رو داره و همیشه همهچیز مطابق برنامه پیش نمیره. این فقط نگاه و انتخاب شخصی منه.
❤7
خلاصه که ما خلاص نمیشیم از این سؤالهای کی ازدواج میکنی/کی بچهدار میشی/کی بچه دوم رو میاری و …
👍8
دوست ندارم امیرعلی تک فرزند باشه اما حتی جرئت فکرکردن به بچهی دوم رو هم ندارم. و قطعا دلم میخواد که تا آمادگیش رو ندارم/نداریم این اتفاق برامون نیوفته. آمادگی روحی و روانیش رو که اصلا ندارم انقدر هم هرکی منو میبینه توصیه میکنه بچهی دوم رو زودتر بیار فاصله سنیشون کمتر باشه کلافه و عصبی شدم.
❤8
فکر نمیکنم هیچوقت با تکفرزند بودن کنار بیام. خیلی بده که جز پدر و مادرت، هیچ همخونی توی دنیا نداشته باشی. میدونم، شاید اگر خواهر یا برادر هم داشتم، رابطهمون خوب از آب درنمیاومد. شاید هر کدوممون غرق زندگی و دغدغههای خودمون میشدیم و وقت زیادی برای هم نداشتیم. شاید حتی هیچوقت صمیمی نمیشدیم. اما با همهی این شایدها، حسرتِ نداشتنش همیشه باهامه.
💔9
یه لیوان از خونهی مامانم آوردم. هر وقت از هم دوریم، تو یک شهر نیستیم، تو همون لیوان برای خودم چایی میریزم. نمیدونم چرا، ولی حس میکنم پیش همیم. احساس خوبی بهم میده.
❤10
یکبار مامانم به امیرعلی گفته شما هندونهت رو بخور تا برقا بیاد و بعدش برقا اومده. حالا کله صبح گیر داده به من که هندونه بیار بخورم تا برقا بیاد🔪.
🤣11🍓2
احساس میکردم اگر اوضاع همینطور بماند، دق میکنم اوضاع همانطور ماند و دق نکردم! همه مان اینگونهایم. لحظههای گندی داریم که تا مرز سکته پیش میرویم، اما میگذرد…
❤7👍1
بعد جالب اینجاست که مامان من اصلا اهل تعریف نیست یعنی از بچگی میگفت بقیه باید ازت تعریف کنن نه من که مادرتم 😐
❤9
خب این چه حرفیه آخه زن؟ 😐
🤯8🤣1
یکی از همکارام رو تو بخش رسانه رو ندیدم تاحالا یعنی چون من دور کارم ندیدم. بعد ولی با مامانم آشناهستن چند روز پیش تلفنی زنگ زد بهم و آخر صحبتهاش گفت کاش بیاید ببینیمتون از نزدیک و فلان مامانتون انقدر از شماو پسرتون تعریف کرده مشتاقم ببینم شمارو تا اینجای مکالمه همه چی عادی بود که یهو برگشت گفت البته همه مامانا خیلی از بچههاشون تعریف میکنن باید خودتونو ببینیم تا بفهمیم چقدر درست بوده! 😐😐😐😐
🤣9🤯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @i_mahlaqa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 490,303 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مـــه لقــــآ 💛” (@i_mahlaqa), 397 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i_mahlaqa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.