#iOS三角洲破解命运 稳定无敌连打 使用前必须把巨魔删除
Signed 可爱雨

Channel
@iOSYYNB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
119subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003588642187 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iOSYYNB |
| Created | 15 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iOSYYNB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 119 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 119 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 15 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (15 April 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 972 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#iOS三角洲破解命运 稳定无敌连打 使用前必须把巨魔删除
Signed 可爱雨
6.3SKC更新日志: 1、增加圆圈开关 2、更新新地址,去掉特征,增加稳定性 3、增加喷子追,狙击追 4、新包为一个包,支持越狱/巨魔双形态,纯巨魔环境和越狱环境下都有效果,均只支持iOS15-16.5系统,推荐巨魔环境玩 5如果越狱使用,请用黑苹果拉黑skc,请保持设备干净,设备黑的使用新版DG管理器清理,或者刷机之后再使用 使用方法:上游戏到光子鸡页面或者大厅页面,在返回skc开hud,之后有悬浮球,点开悬浮球开启功能就行了 验证卡密失败处理办法:1、打开skc闪退挂爱加速北京节点,或者给skc修复联网,网盘工具箱都有.还打不开检查手机设置,时间设置成24小时制,时区设置成北京,关闭dg游戏模式等等 游戏内没效果处理办法: 1.不能和巨魔版dg游戏模式一起使用,dg开了游戏模式要把它关掉,点一下多巴胺里面的重启用户空间或者重启设备 2.不能改filza里面的keychain2db的写入权限,要把keychain2db的…
Signed 💦 Mein
🔣🔠🔠🔠🔣iOS内核裸奔追踪🔣 🏪提卡链接:点击购买。✨ 📥安装网盘:点击下载。✨ 🏪预防人脸:点击下载。✨ ➡️更新日志:点击跳转。✨ 🔵售后客服:@Chgyynblk ✨ ⚠️iOS市场最稳定低价,越狱内核双模式裸奔追踪,拯救iOS拉闸市场💤 ⚠️售后请携带订单截图订单号联系客服没订单号不回复💤 ⚠️本项目仅支持📱🍎之间越狱巨魔环境稳定性一样推荐巨魔环境使用💤 😀该频道售卖iOS相关项目 😀安卓用户请勿下单 ➡️各游戏项目货源位置空缺大量招收各大游戏热门项目 @Chgyynblk🥰
❤5
Signed 💦 Mein
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @iOSYYNB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 399,723 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iOS悠雨主频道🇨🇳” (@iOSYYNB), 119 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iOSYYNB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.