Channel
@iOSDOUBAO
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
-1,083 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002508445193 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iOSDOUBAO |
| Created | 6 May 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iOSDOUBAO |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 24 | +21 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 3 | -1,112 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 1,115 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 1,112 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 1,107 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 1,107 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 6 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
42 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 95.2% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
公益什么
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤3
File, posted without a caption
❤1
所有公益项目密码统一为 TG@HRKJFZ
❤3😁1
🎮iOS和平公益【豆包巨魔绘制】已上传至网盘,需要的自行下载
❤3
🎮iOS无畏公益【急救包CodeV】已上传至网盘,需要的自行下载 密码:TG@HRKJFZ
马上开始更新公益 都要啥
❤22
转图群 https://qm.qq.com/q/CZfJJxba7g
❤2
交流群 https://qm.qq.com/q/TgdasEHIK4
❤1😭1
File, posted without a caption
😀专注iOS/安卓热门手游项目😀 •🎮 和平｜ ❤️ 三角洲 ｜🎨 无畏契约 •🎮 暗区｜ 🎮 穿越火线｜🐯 香肠派对 •🎮 王者｜ 🅰️ 使命召唤｜🎮 PUBG 💠防失联引导页:好人.xyz ✈️防失联频道: https://t.me/HRKJFZ 😀主用卡网:https://merchant.zmfaka.cn/shop/YQDFFXAB 😀备用卡网:https://wqfk.cn/shop/HHRR 🥰唯一客服:@iOSGYZYTC 🔤双向联系:@HRCHT_BOT
👍好人旗下所有频道/群组 🔤频道所有者: @iOSGYZYTC ✈️旗下频道号: 1️⃣防失联频道:@HRKJFZ 2️⃣iOS转图频道:@iOSGYZY 3️⃣安卓转图频道:@HRZTPD 4️⃣公益频道:@iOSDOUBAO 5️⃣交流群总群:@iOSGYZY01 6️⃣公益交流群:@CCGY01 ⚠️一键添加全部频道群组防止失联: https://t.me/addlist/ZkNjhI0hjFdlZjRl
❤5
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @iOSDOUBAO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
公益什么
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2025 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,225,708 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“j” (@iOSDOUBAO), 24 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iOSDOUBAO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.