Channel

Serenade of Elegance: 𝑬𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝑹𝒂𝒕𝒂𝒋𝒌𝒐𝒘𝒔𝒌𝒊

@iEmilyRatajkowski

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002065764238
Type	Channel
Username	@iEmilyRatajkowski
Created	Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	13 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	2
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/iEmilyRatajkowski

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
14 Aug 2026, 16:24	13	no change
13 Aug 2026, 19:35	13	first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime: 10s
Average length: 10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2026, 08:01 UTC27 viewsread 13 August 2026

Forwarded from @inamorajtaPhoto

ㅤ 35! that number somehow feels both surreal and completely right. yesterday was everything i could have hoped for—a room full of people i love, endless laughter, conversations that lingered long into the evening, and every shade of red imaginable. if you know me, you know red has always been my color. bold, passionate, and impossible to ignore. so celebrating this chapter surrounded by crimson flowers, a glossy red …

9 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC87 viewsread 13 August 2026

Photo

ㅤ 35, dressed in red! ♥️ ㅤ

6 Jun 2026, 17:00 UTC915 viewsread 13 August 2026

File

ㅤ Wrapped in a crimson haze and carved in the language of longing. Therefore, the world has shifted on the 7th of June as a masterpiece of mesmerizing beauty has catched the light: Emily O’Hara Ratajkowski. An icon captured in polaroids who ruleth the lens and commandeth the hearts of all who gaze upon her. Today, the world boweth to the goddess of allure where ‘tis is the veneration of an art form. Though, she walke…

29 May 2026, 18:30 UTC38 viewsread 13 August 2026

Forwarded from @inamorajtaPhoto

ㅤ adorned in a deep burgundy velvet gown that gracefully sculpted her silhouette, Emily exuded a subdued yet undeniable elegance that felt both innate and uncontrived. the sumptuous fabric flowed with her every movement, catching the light in delicate, restrained glimmers that enhanced its quiet opulence, creating a presence that was serene yet profoundly arresting. her makeup remained warm and luminous, subtly accen…

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @iEmilyRatajkowski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 422,105 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Eightfold Sunshine
@Eightshine · 461 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

inamorata noire
@inamorajta · 3072 posts

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Serenade of Elegance: 𝑬𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝑹𝒂𝒕𝒂𝒋𝒌𝒐𝒘𝒔𝒌𝒊” (@iEmilyRatajkowski), 13 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iEmilyRatajkowski.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.