3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 491–541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:05
497
-38
8 Aug 2026, 03:49
535
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:19
535
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
115 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
42
36.5%
👍
30
26.1%
🔥
28
24.3%
⚡
6
5.22%
❤
4
3.48%
👾
3
2.61%
✍
1
0.87%
🤣
1
0.87%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 20 we hold a reading for · 80%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iDeliveryManager. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 February 2026 to 15 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем успешной доставки! 🚚📦
Признаюсь честно: последний пост был 6 мая, пауза вышла куда длиннее, чем планировал. Возвращаюсь! 🔄
Пока молчал, успел понаблюдать за историей с Telegram в России: мессенджер с февраля живёт под замедлением, к апрелю сбои доходили почти до 100%, а официальной полной блокировки до сих пор нет - при этом миллионы пользователей просто ушли жить с VPN. А в июне из App Store неожиданно пропал…
🔥 Унификация и стандартизация работы IT-команд это благо или ограничение?
Чем больше становятся IT-организации, тем чаще появляется один и тот же разговор:
“Нам нужна унификация и стандартизация работы команд”
И почти сразу возникает второй лагерь:
“Это убьёт автономность и скорость”
И дальше начинается классический конфликт:
-порядок vs гибкость
-контроль vs автономность
-масштаб vs уникальность команд
📍 Почему эт…
Антипаттерны discovery
Всем успешной доставки! 🚚
Я много уже писал про discovery и даже если discovery внедрили, то он может не работать.
Почему? Потому что вместо инструмента принятия решений он превращается в формальность.
Вот несколько антипаттернов, которые встречаются чаще всего:
1️⃣ Discovery ради галочки
«Ну у нас есть этап discovery»
А что там происходит никто не знает. Результат: фича всё равно берётся «на …
Всем привет, проводим офлайн митап в Перми 😎
Команда Т-Технологий проведет митап в Перми ⚡️
Встречу соберем 7 апреля в БЦ Green Plaza, на базе собственного офиса. Обсудим, какие ИИ-инструменты могут помочь оптимизировать работу системного аналитика, в каких случаях и что стоит автоматизировать. А также, вместе с опытным ментором, разберем как работать со стажерами: ---на что обратить внимание при найме, как онборд…
Привет, подводим итоги:
1.Было 3 заявки
2.Метрики не посмотрели ни по одной 😂
3.Зато обсудили: процессы в команде, приоритизацию и выстраивание E2E
Видимо в следующий раз надо делать рубрику не "покажи метрики", а "покажи процессы" 😎
Всем успешной доставки! 🚚
Любое внедрение изменений почти всегда встречает сопротивление.
Если команде не объяснить, зачем это нужно и какую проблему решает, изменения либо не взлетят, либо будут работать «для галочки».
Обычно изменения «продают»:
-рассказывают
-презентуют
-обучают
-выдают инструкции
Это важный этап и его не надо пропускать.
Но есть способ проще/сильнее. Можно не продавать изменения самому, а задават…
Всем успешной доставки! Эта неделя без поста, занимаюсь заявками которые пришли в рубрику "Покажи метрики", но без мемчиков вас не оставлю 😃
P.S. как у вас телеграм? работает? или надо канал куда-то в другое место переносить?
Всем успешной доставки!
Что важнее: скорость или предсказуемость доставки?
Наверное многие задавались вопросом: что на самом деле важнее для команды скорость или предсказуемость?
Интуитивный ответ обычно такой: конечно скорость. Все хотят быстрее.
Но если посмотреть на систему чуть глубже, то ответ не такой очевидный.
Представьте две команды.
Команда А
Иногда делает задачу за 2 дня, иногда за 20.
Команда Б
Стабильно…
👍5🔥1
Signed Aleksandr T
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iDeliveryManager. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Я Delivery Manager🚀” (@iDeliveryManager), 497 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iDeliveryManager.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
