Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Свободный самозанятый | iBotovedov

@iBotovedov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

42subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003673228149
TypeChannel
Username@iBotovedov
DescriptionЯ Дмитрий. И я помогаю самозанятым вести деятельность без менеджеров и программистов. Это поможет продавать услуги: https://cleverapp.by
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/iBotovedov

Growth

4212 Aug 2026, 17:03 — 42 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 17:15 — 42 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 17:0312 Aug 2026, 17:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:1542no change
12 Aug 2026, 17:0342first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
111.6%
avg views ÷ 42 subscribers
Avg views / post
46.9
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held16 (9 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total375
Reactions total64
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
28
Links
23

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5342.4%
👍4334.4%
118.80%
👀86.40%
😁64.80%
🤔32.40%
👎10.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 16 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iBotovedov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC13 views9 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Вот и вся разница между самозанятым и бизнесом... Чтобы ее понять, достаточно представить холостяка и семьянина с тремя детьми. Холостяк: • выживает на 500 денег • деньги тратит только на себя • в свободное время отдыхает Семьянин: • должен выживать на 2000 • деньги на себя почти не тратит • свободного времени на себя нет Утрированно, зато понятно. В финансовой сфере почти те же критенрии. Бизнес: • имеет со

🔥8👍1

8 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC34 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Больше не работаю с людьми Сделать лавочку во дворе многоэтажки или сделать лавочку у друга на лужайке? В первом случае сделаете для города, во втором для частного лица 💡 У города обычно есть бюджет, а у друга честное "спасибо"! Благодарность - это приятно, но пока еще не валюта Так вооот Однажды я решил сузить свою деятельность и работать с частными лицами. Думал помогать самозанятым🙃 Наивный Физлица конечно

10👍2

5 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC36 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Для подписчиков канала скидка на 0,5% больше😅

😁6🔥21👀1

4 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC53 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ПРОМПТИНГ. Или "Неприятная история из детства, как я за хлебом ходил" А вы помните себя в 6-8 лет? Что мы тогда знали, понимали или какие решения могли принимать? Родители казались взрослыми, понимали это, поэтому: • показали мне, где ближайший магазин • сходили пару раз со мной в него • отправили одного за хлебом Действуя по привычке, я знал, что нужно дойти до магазина, взять хлеб и домой 😰 Но вот ситуация. Пр

🔥7

31 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC38 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я освоил ИИ агентов и вот что я узнал! Оказывается, недостаточно просто говорить всем, что я внедряю агентов. Это никому не нужно. И не понятно Вы же и так знали, что роботы могут писать вместо вас вашим клиентам? Так вот, агент не просто пишет, а УПРАВЛЯЕТ клиентами. Буквально сам переносит их по этапам воронки или канбана, меняет переменные и теги и если нужно, сообщает вам Это значит, что вам не нужно знать пр

🔥10

29 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC38 views7 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Закончилась эпоха Kwork Жалею? Нисколько! За 5 лет десяток заказов из них меньше половины по чат-ботам😁 Первый в жизни заказ пришел именно из Кворк Что-ж, пусть это будет дискриминация, о которой все молчат. Если ты не гражданин РФ, то все Радует, что основные мои клиенты приходили и приходят от сарафана или напрямую из поиска Гугла, Ютуба, Телеграм канала @iBotoved

👀6👎1

15 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC73 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Успех - это когда копируют, потому что хотят так же🤝

14 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTC90 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Звезда, что ли)) Сам пост здесь Пост в Тредс На Пикабу

👍7🔥2

6 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC105 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Жизнь с ИИ: • придумал идею для бизнеса на 100000$ • начала делать все правильно и по плану • решил спросить, что думает ИИ об этом • ИИ сказал, что такое никому не нужно Так я недавно придумал идею с Тг каналами для экспертов Вот например психолог уже занимается этим несколько лет и решил сегодня начать вести канал. А надо было начинать месяц-два назад Но я придумал, как сделать, чтобы у эксперта сразу СЕГОДНЯ п

👍7👀1

26 Jun 2026, 06:54 UTC110 views9 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Короче, сделал доброе дело и стал популярный на весь Узбекистан😅 Соорудил бота, который облегчает рутину Еще вчера было так: - Павел публиковал ближайшие события в Гугл календаре - Каждому из 900 чел в группе нужно было зайти в календарь - Не забыть зайти сегодня, чтобы знать, какое событие будет завтра Как сегодня: - Павел публикует ближайшее событие в Гугл календаре - Бот сам сообщает о событии на всю Ивановск

🔥9

25 Jun 2026, 14:37 UTC81 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сдам в аренду бот-визитку [вот пример] ________ Пока платите, он будет работать. Стоимость 1100 RUB в мес. Но! У вас будет не просто визитка, а удобная админ панель, в которой будете отслеживать активность пользователей, а также можете сами вносить правки в текст, если разберётесь (тоже помогу) Кстати, можете делать сколько хотите рассылок сообщений внутри визитки всем, кто в нее вошел ________ Помогу настроить т

👍7

24 Jun 2026, 06:41 UTC69 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤗 Интернет знает меня как эксперта, а люди нет Вы можете быть крутым спецом в своей сфере, но деняк не будет, если не заявлять о себе окружению А заявить о себе можно с помощью текста (посты), фото (Пинтерест) или видео (соцсети) 🥴 Очень давно, чтобы что-то продать нужно было • написать на листе бумаги • расклеить листы по городу • надеяться, что ее увидят другие Сейчас все проще. Не выходя из дома можно продать

🔥6👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @iBotovedov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 336,297 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Свободный самозанятый | iBotovedov” (@iBotovedov), 42 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iBotovedov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.