Channel
@i3pde
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004459400011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @i3pde |
| Created | 29 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/i3pde |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:02 | 19 | +8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:23 | 11 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 11 | +6 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:47 | 5 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 29 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (29 August 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 10,286 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Sept 2026, 06:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟推荐：9.5/10 【老师艺名】：嘟嘟 【联系方式】：@youdud 【老师芳邻】：21 【验证留名】：我本心无泪 【出击时间】：9月8日 【大概位置】：江北 【教室卫生】：特别干净 【出击水费】：600p 【高端服务】：有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✓ ② 69舔逼 ✓ ③ 情绪价值 ✓ ④ 毒龙 ✓ 【人照相似】：在我眼里嘟神颜值不逊色于任何明星 【推荐程度】：古有刘备三顾茅庐 现有小泪三顾嘟神 已经是第三次回锅了 排了好几天终于等到了 嘟神遥控上门 嘟嘟见到我就说亲亲抱抱 还有这种好事那我肯定荣幸之至 比之前还要漂亮了 我俩聊了好久 像是多年未见的好龟龟 我俩竟然还产生了放不开的情况 哈哈哈 话不说多步入正题 嘟神带着我洗浴 屁股在我的枪上边游走 有点把持不住嘟神的这一套流程 特别是快洗浴完的时候 吃我的枪 洗浴完嘟神给我擦拭身体 服务的特别到位 …
❤3
真心就像内裤 大家都穿在身上 谁也不知道对方有没有穿 但是我戴在头上 你第一眼就能看到我是真心的 可是内裤在头上只会让人觉得有病 真心也是
🌟推荐：9/10 【老师艺名】：鹿鹿 【联系方式】：@lulu65206 【老师芳邻】：18 【验证留名】：我本心无泪 【出击时间】：9月4日 【大概位置】：渝北 【出击水费】：600p 【高端服务】：有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✓ ② 69舔逼 ✓ ③ 情绪价值 ✓ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】：人照9分左右 【推荐程度】：很早就听说过鹿鹿老师的大名 刚过昨天有人在群里发鹿鹿老师的照片 看的我心潮澎湃 立马就私信鹿鹿 可惜约的时间已经有点晚了 只能等到明天噜 今天原本抱着试一下的心态（因为太抢手了）看今天能不能约上 幸运女神还是分给我了我一点运气 约到了16:00的课 打车出发 我还迟到了10多分钟 鹿鹿老师也没有催我 遥控进门 老师打开门的那一刻 长得还可以哦 也算是没有白来 看到鹿鹿屋里目前养了3只猫 个人对猫不敏感 坐下来鹿鹿给我接杯水喝 聊了会天 猫对人很亲近 我进门就往我身…
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
🌟推荐：9.5/10 【老师艺名】：涵涵 【联系方式】：@a176235 【老师芳邻】：18 【验证留名】：我本心无泪 【出击时间】：8月30日 【大概位置】：上门 【出击水费】：700p 【高端服务】：有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✓ ② 69舔逼 ✓ ③ 情绪价值 ✓ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】：本人比照片好看 【推荐程度】：抱着今天试试看能不能约上的心态 没想到还有位置 那还说啥直接约了 定好时间见面，初见涵涵蹲在角落里等我 好小一只少萝 发现比照片上边的好要好看 见面主动的牵着我的手 带着涵涵去酒店 进门坐到床上 我俩就坐下聊会天 真的是老乡见老乡两眼泪汪汪 感觉有聊不完的话题 情绪价值也给的满满的 交了学费 脱衣洗浴 然后我就发现了 涵涵的肚子上竟然还有魅魔贴 后边也有 有点色情了 涵涵带着我去洗浴 洗浴之后涵涵在镜子面前欣赏自己曼妙的身材 告诉我她只有80多斤 到床上 抱着我 说我身体…
我好像想通了 我确实很想和你在一起 直到现在也很想 但我也清楚的知道 你实在是不喜欢我 有些事也不是我坚持就会有结果 但如果你让我一瞬间就放下我也做不到 毕竟我真的挺喜欢你的 但我现在觉得 可以联系就够了 还能喜欢你就够了 在不在一起或许真的没那么重要了 我或许还是会找你 但目的不是为了让你喜欢我 为的只是把我的喜欢耗尽殆尽 不在自我内耗 我要我以后想起来都不会觉得遗憾 我为的不再是那个结果 为的是真正分别的那天我一点泪都不流 我好我心安理得的问心无愧 我们都没错 只是时间不对 人不对
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @i3pde. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“泪の日记本” (@i3pde), 19 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i3pde.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.