Channel
@hypersign_ann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
457subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001191668015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hypersign_ann |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hypersign_ann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 457 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 459 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 463 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 466 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 466 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 21 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
27 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 17 | 63.0% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 18.5% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 14.8% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2025 to 5 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💼 KYB Just Got an Upgrade — And Now Businesses Get Wallets Too! Europe’s rolling out Digital Identity Wallets in 13+ countries to make business checks less boring and way faster: ✅ Legal entity? ✅ 👥 UBOs? ✅ ✍️ Signing rights? ✅ With Hypersign’s privacy-first KYB, companies can: 🔁 Reuse their creds like pros 🔐 Chill knowing they’re MiCA & EUDI compliant ⚡️ Onboard faster than your coffee order Say goodbye to paper…
❤1
eIDAS 2.0 is now live in the EU. Wallet-native identity is here — enabling faster, compliant, and privacy-first KYC. At @hypersignchain, we support this shift with SSI & verifiable credentials. 🔐 Go wallet-native. 🌐 Go Hypersign. 👉 hypersign.id #eIDAS2 #DigitalIdentity #KYC #SSI #Web3Compliance #Hypersign 👉 Share: https://x.com/hypersignchain/status/1947290380942110730
❤3
👀 When your KYC data gets leaked because someone took a bribe... 💥 Yep, that actually happened at Coinbase. 📦 Full names, IDs, bank info — all exposed. Still using Web2 KYC in a Web3 world? That’s wild. Let’s talk decentralized identity with Hypersign 🔐 📖 Read the full breakdown: https://www.hypersign.id/blogs/tpost/409a9glop1-coinbase-kyc-breach-a-wake-up-call-for-c #Crypto #KYC #Web3Privacy #HypersignID #DataBr…
❤1👌1
Startups, say goodbye to clunky KYC! 👋 We’ve teamed up with @AfthoniaLab to bring fast, privacy-first identity to the next-gen builders. ✅ Verified users ✅ Zero data drama ✅ Ready for scale from Day 1 📖 Read the full story: https://www.hypersign.id/blogs/tpost/gvm2zuumi1-empowering-startups-with-trusted-identit Let’s build smart 🧠💥 #HypersignID #Web3Startups #KYC #SSI # #Afthonia 👉 Share: https://x.com/hypersign…
🔥2
🎙 The episode is live! It’s not just tech talk — it’s 🔐 identity, 🔎 zero-knowledge, ❤️ doing what you love & 🧱 building real trust. @bhushan_vikram brings the fire in this @NewzchainHQ exclusive! 🎥 Full episode is live: https://youtu.be/yQyuaMbVYVY #Hypersign #ZKProofs #SSI #Web3 #Newzchain 👉 Share: https://x.com/hypersignchain/status/1933144552543789563
🔥3
🔐 ZK, SSI & a whole lot of 🔥 Our Co-founder @bhushan_vikram sat down with @NewzchainHQ to talk identity, privacy & building real trust in Web3. Catch the sneak peek 👀 Full drop soon. Stay tuned! #Hypersign #NewzchainExclusive #ZKProofs #SSI #Web3 👉 Share: https://x.com/hypersignchain/status/1932777034801164629
Big ideas, bold moves, and the story behind building Hypersign. We wrapped an exclusive founder interview on the challenges and vision driving us. Big thanks to @NewzchainHQ, @NabarunChakraborty, and their team — @whattheharsh and @NSuptotthita for making it happen! #FounderStories coming soon! 👀 👉 Share: https://x.com/hypersignchain/status/1930264042867679702
🔥1
🚨 Hypersign at Token2049 Dubai 🚨 We had powerful convos with leaders from Circle, CopperX, Giottus, Animoca & Stargazer—all pointing to one thing: Web3 needs smarter AML. 🔍 Current Gaps: – No wallet-to-business tracking – Weak on-chain analytics – No cross-platform integration 💡 Hypersign’s Vision: ✅ Link wallets with real IDs 🕵️ On-chain forensic insights ⚡️ Sanction list checks We’re building AML for the future…
🔥5
Just wrapped up an inspiring time at #BlockchainThinkers by @GieseckeDevrie, @European Women Payments Network (EWPN), @TUMBlockchain & @Frankfurt School Blockchain Center🔥 From tackling crypto fraud to empowering users with #DID and exploring the future of programmable money — this event was all about real impact over hype. #HypersignID #Web3 #eIDAS #CBDC 👉Share: https://x.com/hypersignchain/status/190999803151825…
🚀 Exciting News! Hypersign is teaming up with Giesecke+Devrient, TUM Blockchain Club, EWPN & Frankfurt School Blockchain Center for the first BLOCKCHAIN THINKERS event! 📅 April 7 | 4:00 PM | Munich Join industry pioneers Robert Heinze, Christiane Zhao, Sagar Barvaliya, Andreas Barthelmes, Co-Pierre Georg, Husen Kapasi as we tackle: 🔹 Top blockchain investment trends for 2025 🔹 On-chain vs. off-chain strategies 🔹 …
👏4
🥐 Big news from Paris! 🇫🇷 Hypersign is shortlisted in the Top 100 Projects at @ParisBlockWeek! 🚀🔐 We’re one step closer to bringing decentralized identity & Web3 security to PBW 2025 (April 8-12)! Manifesting good vibes 🤞 Stay tuned! #ParisBlockchainWeek #StartinBlock #Hypersign 👉Share: https://x.com/hypersignchain/status/1899802374891302941
🔥3
🚀 Hypersign participated in SmartTech Asia! 🚀 A major event focused on identification, authentication, and digital payments. Here’s a quick recap of the highlights! 🧵👇 1/ SmartTech Asia brought together top companies in RFID cards, NFC, security printing, and access control solutions. 2/ At our booth, we met industry leaders from FinTech, card payment systems, security printing, and more. 3/ We showcased how Hype…
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @hypersign_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 653,239 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hypersign_ann named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hypersign — News & Updates” (@hypersign_ann), 457 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hypersign_ann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.