Channel
@hyperrealite
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
685subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001836013022 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hyperrealite |
| Description | Канал журнала «Процесс» с новостями об издании, литературе и многом другом. Наш Бусти: https://boosty.to/prozessjournal По вопросам рекламы и сотрудничества: prozessjournal@gmail.com |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hyperrealite |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 685 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 685 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
154 reactions across 8 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 53.2% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 21.4% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 8.44% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 5.19% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Привет! Продолжаем публиковать отзывы авторов о третьем номере журнала. На очереди: Сергей Алехин «Дабы избежать момента с распылением между n-ым количеством писателей, драматургов и поэтов, я предпочту сосредоточиться на одном - том, который мне более всех запал в душу. Стихи Андрея Любченко съедают моё внимание, грызут глаза, лакают мозговой студень. У всего слова везде и всегда одинаковые, но иногда поэт ставит…
❤10🔥3👍1😎1
Привет! Мы решили опросить наших авторов и узнать их мнение о вышедшем третьем номере. Первым высказался Андрей Любченко: «В третьем номере (как, собственно, и во втором) мне пришелся по душе раздел ставропольского самородка Магомеда Узденова. Похоже, на линии раздачи мы с ним стоим рядом: в сальном пару котлов, где, вместо котлет и пирожков с полки, всем раздают лещей и несоленые срамные уды. И от того, что ожидае…
❤11🔥4👍3
Наш главный редактор Михаил Ищенко обнаружил в Гоа книжный, в котором мы немедленно захотели провести презентацию. Дальше — его прямая речь. — Был замечен книжный магазин в городе Панаджи, штат Гоа, Индия. Как и водится, пустой. Видно, что работает там сам владелец, очень хорошо понимает ассортимент и расположение. С ним вел беседу интересный дядечка, из местных. По фотографиям видно, что магазин далеко не современ…
❤10💅3🔥3👍1
Топ-3 способа объяснить книгу так, чтобы ее не поняли. Подборка цитат классиков литературоведения от Яны Баженовой «Нельзя судить пулю по цвету, вкусу, запаху. Она судима с точки зрения ее динамики. <…> оценивать динамический факт с точки зрения статической — то же, что оценивать качества ядра вне вопроса о полете. "Ядро" может быть очень хорошим на вид и не лететь, т.е. не быть ядром, и может быть "неуклюжим" и "бе…
❤13🔥7👍3
Есть ли книги, которые стыдно читать в общественном месте?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Привет! Потихоньку возвращаемся в привычный формат работы, поэтому ловите Топ-3 пьесы, ломающие жанр, от Агнессы Перловой 🤩 «Ёлка у Ивановых» — Александр Введенский В пьесе нет ни одного Иванова, зато есть семидесятишестилетний мальчик и восьмидесятидвухлетняя девочка — и это только начало слома. Сюжет пересказать можно: нянька убивает ребёнка топором, её судят, а в финале все умирают прямо у ёлки — но пересказ бесс…
❤8🔥4👏3🤔3
Здравствуйте, дорогие подписчики! Этот пост – обращение к покупателям третьего номера "Процесс" в бумажном виде. Недавно обнаружилось, что в руки к одному покупателю попал журнал, в котором были задублированы тексты при сшивании. Если вы – обладатель экземпляра с подобной патологией или заметили еще что-то странное, свяжитесь напрямую с главным редактором @SoundsLikeTechno. Мы обязательно решим вашу проблему и пер…
❤7😢3
Тридцать реакций честно заработаны – спасибо, что вы с нами в этой тесноте единомышленников! ♥️ Как и обещали, ссылка на полный альбом с презентации третьего номера: https://izmaylovaalexandraa.wfolio.pro/disk/09-04-2026-prezentatsiya-zhurnala-protsess-72ccxp. Осторожно: там очень много неловких ракурсов и счастливых лиц. Ищите себя!
🔥8❤3😍3🤯1
Всем привет! Мы с фотографиями с прошедшего 20 дней назад события – презентации третьего номера! Еще раз сердечно благодарим всех за невероятно сильную самиздатскую атмосферу тесноты среди единомышленников! 30 реакций под этим постом, и мы дадим ссылку на весь альбом с мероприятия😜
❤20👍5💅5🔥4👀1🤩1🦄1😱1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @hyperrealite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Есть ли книги, которые стыдно читать в общественном месте?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 26 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 728,831 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Журнал «Процесс»” (@hyperrealite), 685 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hyperrealite.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.