Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hwi Nori

Channel

Hwi Nori

@hwi_nori

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

38subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002435618373
TypeChannel
Username@hwi_nori
Descriptionpost punk \ revival, electronic rock \ compulsion, darkwavе \ allusion, mature melancholy \ dance edition https://band.link/hwinori https://t.me/hwi_nori https://vk.com/hwinori https://www.instagram.com/hwi_nori_band https://www.youtube.com/@HwiNori
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/hwi_nori

Growth

3810 Aug 2026, 01:17 — 38 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:46 — 38 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 01:1710 Aug 2026, 20:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:4638no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:1738first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
22
Videos
14
Links
35

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 25s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
154100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Feb 2026, 19:45 UTC103 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Алисии больше нет. Я несколько раз переписывал пост и в какой-то момент хотел вовсе ничего не публиковать. Но всё же напишу. В прошлую субботу я узнал, что Алисии не стало. После долгой и тяжёлой болезни у неё не осталось сил. Подробностей не будет. Можно было бы описать, какой она была, но это были бы лишь общие слова. Типичные и печальные. Она успела оставить после себя много прекрасного. У нас с ней была догов

18

3 Feb 2026, 06:11 UTC106 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Какая песня Вам нравится больше?

  1. 135513%
  2. What Are You Talking About?25%
  3. You Are Right13%
  4. Clean Me Up38%
  5. Get Around Your Blame13%
  6. Señales del Espacio0%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Jan 2026, 17:26 UTC119 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Несколько слов о заглавной композиции Clean Me Up. Эта песня стала для нас отправной точкой всей истории вышедшего макси-сингла - моментом, когда накопленная боль ищет любой выход. Речь о состоянии, в котором физическая боль от травм и душевная пустота от потерь становятся невыносимыми. Именно это ощущение заставляет искать спасение любыми средствами, но найденный выход оказывается ложным и саморазрушительным. Текс

8

25 Jan 2026, 21:36 UTC550 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

‼️‼️‼️ Релиз нового макси-сингла "Clean Me Up" Это наше самое личное и глубокое высказывание на сегодняшний день. Релиз, объединяющий в единое повествование три разноплановые композиции, представляет собой исследование боли и тех саморазрушительных путей, на которые нас толкает попытка от неё избавиться. В центре сюжета "Clean Me Up" - желание заглушить страдание от болезней, травмы, потери или пустоты с помощью де

12

21 Jan 2026, 07:28 UTC75 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @darkscene36Photo

И еще один локальный релиз, нового года. 26 января проект-загадка, Hwi Nori должен в вас забросить новый концептуальный макси-сингл "Clean Me Up" Вот чего чего, а нагнать интриги они умеют. И будем честны, все угрозы пока, что были реализованы. Так, что новая порция про боль, агонию травм и болезней, одиночества и потерь, уж будьте уверены, вы получите. «Музыкальный рисунок , построенный на дарквейве и дополненный м

5

19 Jan 2026, 08:50 UTC188 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

26 января проект Hwi Nori предоставит концептуальный макси-сингл "Clean Me Up" Три песни, объединённые одной темой: честный разговор о боли, которую мы носим в себе. О боли, что проявляется всепоглощающей агонией от травм и болезней, и о той, что поселяется внутри от одиночества и потерь. Релиз показывает, как попытки заглушить это страдание с помощью деструктивных средств ведут в тупик: мимолётное облегчение и отвл

8

16 Jan 2026, 09:05 UTC141 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

____ Bandlink 1st single «1355» 2nd single «What Are You Talking About?» 3rd single «YOU ARE RIGHT» (Music Video: YouTube, Yandex, VK)

9

12 Jan 2026, 16:36 UTC156 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

____ Bandlink 1st single «1355» 2nd single «What Are You Talking About?» 3rd single «YOU ARE RIGHT» (Music Video: YouTube, Yandex, VK)

8

9 Jan 2026, 16:38 UTC162 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

____ Bandlink 1st single «1355» 2nd single «What Are You Talking About?» 3rd single «YOU ARE RIGHT» (Music Video: YouTube, Yandex, VK)

12

5 Jan 2026, 17:38 UTC184 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

____ Bandlink 1st single «1355» 2nd single «What Are You Talking About?» 3rd single «YOU ARE RIGHT» (Music Video: YouTube, Yandex, VK)

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hwi_nori. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Feb 2026, 06:11 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

Какая песня Вам нравится больше?

  1. 135513%
  2. What Are You Talking About?25%
  3. You Are Right13%
  4. Clean Me Up38%
  5. Get Around Your Blame13%
  6. Señales del Espacio0%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 5 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,185,592 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hwi Nori” (@hwi_nori), 38 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hwi_nori.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.