Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ʜᴜᴢᴇʏᴍ

Channel

ʜᴜᴢᴇʏᴍ

@huzeymm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

288subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002057774325
TypeChannel
Username@huzeymm
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/huzeymm

Growth

2682882788 August 2026 — 268 subscribers8 August 2026 — 270 subscribers15 August 2026 — 288 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 265–291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 13:36288+18
8 Aug 2026, 22:05270+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:01268first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
79.3%
avg views ÷ 288 subscribers
Avg views / post
228
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,970
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 00:28 UTC37 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ömer b. Hattâb (radıyallahu anh) şöyle demiştir: “Gerçekten, cevaptan endişe etmiyorum. Benim üzerime düşen yalnızca O’na yönelmektir. Çünkü bana dua etmek nasip edilmişse, cevap da onunla birlikte olacaktır.” Fevâid/210

7 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC68 viewsread 8 August 2026

«Allahʼım, sen benim Rabbimsin. Senden başka ilâh yoktur. Beni sen yarattın ve ben senin kulunum. Gücümün yettiği kadar sana verdiğim ahde ve vaade sadığım. Yaptıklarımın şerrinden sana sığınırım. Bana verdiğin nimetini itiraf ediyor ve günahımı kabul ediyorum. Beni bağışla! Şüphesiz ki günahları yalnız sen bağışlarsın!»

6 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026

Vuheyb b. el-Verd (rahimehullah) şöyle demiştir: “Denilmiştir ki: Hikmet on parçadan ibarettir; dokuzu sükût, onuncusu ise insanlardan uzaklaşmaktır.” İbn Ebîd-Dünyâ, es-Samt/36

5 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC112 viewsread 8 August 2026

Fudayl b. İyâd (rahimehullah) şöyle demiştir: “Amellerin en faziletlisi, en gizli yapılanıdır. Çünkü o, şeytanın vesvesesinden daha çok korunmuştur ve riyadan daha uzaktır.” İbn Ebîd-Dünyâ, el-İhlâs veʼn-Niyye/30

4 Aug 2026, 00:38 UTC146 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ahmed b. Harb (rahimehullah) şöyle demiştir: “Bir kadında şu altı özellik bulunursa, onun fazileti kemale ermiş olur: • Beş vakit namazı muhafaza etmesi, • Kocasına karşı uyumlu ve itaatkâr olması, • Rabbini razı etmeye çalışması, • Dilini gıybet ve koğuculuktan koruması, • Dünya malına aşırı bağlı olmaması, • Musibet ve sıkıntı zamanlarında sabretmesi.” Siyeru A‘lâmu’n-Nübelâ

3 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC159 viewsread 8 August 2026

“İnsanın kendi kusurlarını görememesi, Allah’ın ona verdiği en büyük cezalardan biridir. Çünkü kişi kusurlarını göremezse, onlardan asla kurtulamaz.” Ravdatuʼul-Ukalâ/40

1 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC261 viewsread 8 August 2026

İnsan, Kur’an’ı sevmeden Allah’ı gerçekten sevemez. Bu sebeple İbn Mes‘ud (radıyallahu anh) şöyle demiştir: ‘Allah’ı seviyor muyum?’ diye kendinize sormayın. Kendinize sorun: ‘Kur’an’ı seviyormuyum?’ Gerçekten, Kur’an’ı seviyorsanız, Allah’ı da seviyorsunuz demektir. Kur’an’a olan sevginiz arttıkça, Allah’a olan sevginiz de o ölçüde artar.”

28 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC310 viewsread 8 August 2026

“Şüphesiz hasedin sonuçları yıkıcıdır. Hased, dostları birbirinden ayırır; kardeşi kardeşten uzaklaştırır. Haset eden kimse, kendisini mahrum bırakılmış gördüğü için Allahʼın takdirine itiraz eder. Bu yüzden ne razı olur ne de huzur bulur; aksine hüzün ve keder içinde yaşar. İnsan, dünya işlerinde kendisinden aşağıda olana bakmalıdır. Çünkü bu, Allahʼın nimetini fark etmeye ve Oʼna şükretmeye daha yakındır. Kendisind

27 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC319 viewsread 8 August 2026

Muhammed b. Abdulvehhâb (rahimehullah) şöyle demiştir: “Tevhid, bütün ibadetlerin temelidir. İbadet, tevhid üzerine bina edilmemişse onun hiçbir değeri yoktur.” Kitâbuʼt-Tevhîd bab: Tevhidin fazileti ve günahlara kefaret oluşu bölümü.

27 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC308 viewsread 8 August 2026

İbn Teymiyye (rahimehullah) şöyle demiştir: “Eğer onların (kâfirlerin) işledikleri ameller sebebiyle bayram günlerinde Allahʼın gazabı üzerlerine iniyorsa, onların amellerini veya o amellerden bir kısmını onlarla birlikte işleyen kimse de bu sebeple cezaya uğramaz mı?” el-Fetâvaʼl-Kübrâ/2/485

23 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC374 viewsread 8 August 2026

“Allah iki kalbin kavuşmasını dilediğinde, aralarında gök ile yer kadar mesafe olsa bile onları bir araya getirir.”

22 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC392 viewsread 8 August 2026

İbn Receb el-Hanbelî (rahimehullah) şöyle demiştir: Eğer cehennem ehli dünya ateşine atılsaydı, (rahat bir yatak gibi) orada yatarlardı. et-Tahvîf mineʼn-Nâr veʼt-Ta‘rîf bi Hâli Dâriʼl-Bevâr

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @huzeymm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,366,471 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ʜᴜᴢᴇʏᴍ” (@huzeymm), 288 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huzeymm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.