ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΉΡ! ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² π€©π€©

Channel
ππ πππ ππππΊ ππππ β‘γΜΌ γ € Νγ €Χγ €
@hutaomyheart
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
138subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002908499982 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hutaomyheart |
| Created | 20 October 2025 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hutaomyheart |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 138 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 137 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 20 October 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 52.2%
- avg views Γ· 138 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 72.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- β
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (20 October 2025 β 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 72 |
| Reactions total | β |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 17 | 60.7% | |
| π» | 6 | 21.4% | |
| πΏ | 4 | 14.3% | |
| π³ | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
β‘γ έ πΌππππΎππΊππππ βΊβΊ ΠΌΡ Π½Π΅ Π±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π»ΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² @ripirl γπππ
Sticker, posted without a caption
ΦΉβΦ΄ π ππππππ πΏππ πΎπππ πππΎπΎπ π» Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° Π² Π°Π΄ΠΌΠΈΠ½Ρ γπ€©π€© οΈέ Π1 βΠΏΡΠ΅Π²Π΄ΠΎ && ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ && ΡΠ· ΰ§ οΈέ Π2 β ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Π΄Π°Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠ² && Π±ΡΡΡΠΎΠ² && ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ οΈέ Π3 βΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ»Π°Π½ κ Π½Π΅Ρ ΠΊΠ»Π°Π½Π° (ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ) ππ Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΊΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΡ Π² ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π»Π°
π5
β ποΈπ ππΎπππΎππ ππππ γ Π²Π°Ρ ΠΎΡΠ·ΡΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π² Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Λ
π5π³1
ΰ³γ €ΦΉ πΉ πππ ππππΊ ππππ β Λ ποΈποΈ πΜΈ Π³Π°ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΏΡ && ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΏ && Π±ΡΡΡΡ && Π΅ΡΠΊ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ β Φ΄ π γ €ΧποΈ π α³ π πππΌπΎ ΰΌ ππΎπππΎππ ΰΌ π·ππ π
π4
π’πγ € ΦΊγ €ππππΌπΎπ πππ ποΈποΈ β«Ά 2ΠΠ++ ποΈγ €Χ βΈ πππΊππΊπππΎπΎπ½ γ ποΈ γ €Χ β Ϋͺ 6Π ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠ² ΰΌ 25β½ ΰΌ 15 Π·Π² π β Ϋͺ 8Π ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠ² ΰΌ 3Oβ½ ΰΌ 25 Π·Π² π γ €Χ β Ϋͺ 1ΠΠ ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠ² ΰΌ 4Oβ½ ΰΌ 3O Π·Π² π γ € β Ϋͺ 15O ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠ² ΰΌ 6Oβ½ ΰΌ 5O Π·Π² π γ €Χ β Ϋͺ 2ΠΠ ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠ² ΰΌ 8Oβ½ ΰΌ 6Π Π·Π² π 25Π ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠ² ΰΌ 1ΠΠβ½ ΰΌ 8ΠΠ·Π²π 3ΠΠ ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠ² ΰΌ 12Πβ½ ΰΌ 9Π Π·Π²π π’π ππππ β‘γ €Χ βΈ πππππππ γ ποΈ γ €Χ β Ϋͺβ¦
π»6πΏ4π3
ππ πππ ππππΊ ππππ β‘γΜΌ γ € Νγ €Χγ € pinned Deleted message
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @hutaomyheart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 51,061 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ πππ ππππΊ ππππ β‘γΜΌ γ € Νγ €Χγ €β (@hutaomyheart), 138 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hutaomyheart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.