Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

HUSTLE INVEST

@hustleinvst

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

422subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001820775125
TypeChannel
Username@hustleinvst
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hustleinvst

Growth

4224244237 August 2026 — 424 subscribers8 August 2026 — 424 subscribers14 August 2026 — 422 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 422–424 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:48422-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:20424no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:14424first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 58323849845932064814845.7%
🔥4643.8%
custom 535266992111538666143.81%
43.81%
custom 529225104420452107232.86%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2024 to 28 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 May 2025, 19:41 UTC≈1,460 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В крипте важна гибкость, а не лок ин 24/7. Как бы это ни звучало как банальность из твиттер-мотивации, но в какой-то момент ты это чувствуешь не умом, а спиной. Особенно если последние месяцы провёл за монитором в бесконечном поиске следующего щитка, следующего дропа, следующего отката. Осенью я именно так и жил. Рынок был на подъёме, щитки стреляли, Трамп казался крипто надеждой, альтсезон уже с нами в одной комна

custom 583238498459320648164custom 53526699211153866614

13 May 2025, 15:24 UTC≈1,180 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то получил свои носки от Backpack (заказывал их еще в феврале) А если кто еще не зареган там, то велком, там как раз один из сезонов в самом разгаре

custom 58323849845932064814🔥2

6 Apr 2025, 10:50 UTC≈1,380 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Интересный ресерч по некоторым из перспективных проектов в области AI x Blockchain Советую вам ознакомиться с ним А что в этих проектах можно поделать я распишу позже

🔥7custom 58323849845932064814

24 Nov 2024, 17:34 UTC≈2,790 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Новый проект от наших ребят из команды NFD/Leo IDO Будет что то по типу пампфана, но зная их опыт и проекты которые были до, они учтут косяки пампфана и сделаю что то интересное (даже интро уже прикольное) Пока потыкаться нельзя, но можно зарегаться и набрать рефов Something.cool Инвайт код (если просит ввести вручную): T1L3AH PS: В комментариях напишу почему надо следить за ними

🔥5custom 52922510442045210723custom 58323849845932064812

18 Sept 2024, 19:16 UTC≈3,250 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Федеральная резервная система США (ФРС) понижает ставку на 0.5%, до 5% — первое снижение с марта 2020 года. Первый признак того, что фрс немного запоздала с понижением ставки.

🔥8

18 Sept 2024, 13:55 UTC≈2,410 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dadaev_ethVideo

На проходящей сегодня в Сингапуре крипто конференции Token 2049 Виталик Бутерин немного свихнулся. Произошло это на фоне новостей о том, что $ETH вновь может упасть до 2000$. Такое мнение высказал аналитик телеграм канала Dadaev Dorogo Салманов Рамазан, считающийся авторитетным экономистом в узких кругах. Так почему же, все таки, сегодня день Х: 1) Сегодня мы увидим первое снижение целевой ставки за долгий период

🔥7custom 58323849845932064814

7 Sept 2024, 19:07 UTC≈1,980 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не знаю, нужна ли запись эфира, так как стрим шел 2 часа. Думаю вряд ли кто будет его пересматривать. Жаль нет монтажер который из двухчасового стрима сделает интересное видео на минут ~30... Или есть? 👐 P.S. за отдельную плату

custom 58323849845932064816

7 Sept 2024, 14:11 UTC≈1,500 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Обсудим максимально депрессивный рынок, варианты капитуляции и виды заводов с нехваткой квалифицированных криптанов 😄 Вопросы к эфиру можете писать в комментариях под этот пост 👇

custom 58323849845932064816🔥4

4 Sept 2024, 17:46 UTC≈1,310 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💩 Такс, начнем осень с того что немного разбогатеем Чекаем дроп от Grass тут : https://grassfoundation.io/eligibility Распределение дропа по токеномике: Closed Alpha: 1.5% Epochs 1-7: 7% Bonus Epoch: 0.5% To Be Announced: 1% Приятный бонус за открытую вкладку в браузере.

🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hustleinvst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 748,895 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HUSTLE INVEST” (@hustleinvst), 422 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hustleinvst.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.