Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HUSKERDUST CONF!💗♠

Channel

HUSKERDUST CONF!💗♠

@huskerdust_conf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

240subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002156034733
TypeChannel
Username@huskerdust_conf
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/huskerdust_conf

Growth

24012 Aug 2026, 03:01 — 240 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 06:56 — 240 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 03:0112 Aug 2026, 06:56
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 239–241 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:56240no change
12 Aug 2026, 03:01240first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 30 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4234.7%
💋2319.0%
custom 53773974265229612681714.0%
❤‍🔥129.92%
💘119.09%
custom 537765053324067956375.79%
👏54.13%
🥰32.48%
👍10.826%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 14 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Apr 2026, 15:20 UTC225 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Здрасьте x2 Два моих любимых придурочка, и их создатель Госпаде я намучилась с крыльями хаска, а так в принципе норм ( @NastiLutik ) [🍪] — ХОСПАДЕ, КАКИЕ МИЛЫЕ #Тейк [🍪]

💋10👍1

14 Apr 2026, 13:56 UTC183 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

[🍪] —Кф немнога живёт 🤍🤍: @f0m4x in Tik tok #АдмТейк #Эдит

8

14 Apr 2026, 13:54 UTC154 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

[🍪] — Я не знаю можно ли такое выкладывать, но пусть будет 🥸 🤍🤍: @f0m4x in Tik tok #АдмТейк #Видео

9

14 Apr 2026, 13:48 UTC129 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Здрасьте, я тут впервые (⁠ ⁠ꈍ⁠ᴗ⁠ꈍ⁠) Решила показать то, от чего у меня болела спина и синяки под глазами, потому что когда приходит вдохновение? Правильно, в 12 ночи ( @NastiLutik ) #Тейк [🍪]

9

19 Feb 2026, 02:19 UTC248 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @huskerdustnewsPhoto

𓏲 ࣪₊♡𓂃 WELCOME TO HUSKERDUST NEWS CHANNEL ﹗ ────────────────────────────────── 🕷:: В данном канале будут публиковаться новости, интервью с Вивьен, концепты, мерч и многое другое с пейрингом из мира Hellaverse - HuskerDust (ХаскерДасты), которые находятся в "slow burn" развитии!! ПРАВИЛА :: 1. Прошу обратить ваше внимание на общение в чате. Никаких оскорблений, посылов и тому подобного быть не должно. Карается мутом

custom 53773974265229612683

14 Feb 2026, 07:31 UTC233 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🕷] - хаскердасты на 72, мне кажется, это тоже хорошо!! Даже в топ 100 входит, я предельно рад Кстати, всех днем святого Валентина!! #адмтейк #новости

15custom 53776505332406795633custom 53773974265229612682

13 Feb 2026, 18:11 UTC218 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всех с днем святого Валентина 💝 Тгк; https://t.me/curdylol #тейк #арт [🕷]

custom 537739742652296126812💘6💋4custom 53776505332406795634

13 Feb 2026, 17:21 UTC185 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🕷] - всем привет!! Вышел мерч ко дню святого Валентина, я считаю, что нельзя не обсудить. Хаскердастов, как мы видим, тут нет (оно и ясно, тк в мерче ярко выражены только каноничные), НО нужно порассуждать! Во втором сезоне понятно, что Энджел остается с Валом, из-за чего мы видим, что в совместных фотках с отелем его нет, есть только одиночные. Даже там, где я выделил, он один (скорее всего это фотка по работе, раз

💋9💘5

8 Feb 2026, 14:07 UTC218 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🕷] - давно не было постов, да? #адмтейк #арт

❤‍🔥12👏5🥰3

7 Feb 2026, 10:31 UTC226 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ: Ꮧюбишь 𝑲апитана ??? 👀 ★ 𝑯екуда девать куча контента по нему ?? ( ТпТ )ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ🪽 . 🐾 𝑻огда тебе к нам . Welcome to 𝓒𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘯 𝓬𝓯 . ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝘕𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 . 🐚

5 Feb 2026, 17:25 UTC230 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @shiftingconfessionPhoto

хочешь поделиться историей шифтинга?🤩 хочешь советов? или мотивацию?🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😀😀😀 🤩тогда мы ждем тебя в .. 🤩🌟😀😀😀😀 🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🤩🤩😀😀😀😀🌟 🤩 ЧТО ТАКОЕ 🟣🟣🟣🟣🟣🟣🟣❓️☠ шифтинг - перенос сознания в желаемую реальность. ты можешь попасть в любимую игру, фильм или книгу лишь с помощью намерения. 😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀 делись своими : — ⏰историями 🤩 — 🤩саблиминалами🤩 — 💜советами🤩🌟🌟😀😀 — 🤩или же просто🤩😀😀 высказывайся о теме шифт

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @huskerdust_conf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,315,507 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HUSKERDUST CONF!💗♠” (@huskerdust_conf), 240 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huskerdust_conf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.