Channel
@hunterkaleidoscope
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
102subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003848799491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hunterkaleidoscope |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hunterkaleidoscope |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 102 | -2 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 14:58 | 104 | -1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 105 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 104 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 103 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 102 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 100 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 100 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 82.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👆👆👆 THE TOWN I LOVED SO WELL ...Так что же у нас любит писать прозрачно-солнечные пронзительные песни с текстом "всё хорошо, все умерли"?.. Правильно: ИРЛАНДЦЫ! И оригинал песни принадлежит Филу Култеру (Phil Coulter, род. 1942) - ирландскому композитору, автору песен, пианисту и продюсеру из Дерри, Северная Ирландия. И оригинал - он прямо ну совсем другой. Вот текст оригинала: ГОРОД, КОТОРЫЙ Я ТАК ЛЮБИЛ В мое…
👍2💔2
ГОРОД, КОТОРЫЙ Я ТАК ЛЮБИЛ А я тут снова с французской песней дивной красоты. Французской?.. Но обо всём по порядку. :) И сначала - перевод: ГОРОД, КОТОРЫЙ Я ТАК ЛЮБИЛ Он родился из фермы, на самом верху скалы, этот город, который я так любил. От прачечной - до зимы, от церкви - до лета, годы снизывались в века... У них были жатвы вместо летнего отдыха, а кровь женщин пятнала лён на прялках, и дождь падал белым …
❤3
Художница, иллюстратор, дизайнер и собирательница народного искусства, Елена Поленова стояла у истоков того направления, которое позже назовут русским модерном. Работая в Абрамцевском кружке Саввы Мамонтова, Поленова одной из первых начала не просто копировать народные мотивы, а творчески переосмыслять их, превращая крестьянскую резьбу, вышивку и сказочные сюжеты в современное искусство. Особую известность ей принес…
❤13
Елена Поленова (1850-1898) обычно остаётся в тени своего знаменитого брата Василия Поленова. И совершенно напрасно. Одна из первых профессиональных художниц России, мастер акварели, пейзажистка, иллюстратор и собирательница русского фольклора, она стала одной из ключевых фигур, подготовивших появление русского модерна. До того как создать знаменитые иллюстрации к народным сказкам, Поленова много писала пейзажи. Её л…
❤8🔥2
«Индеец и лилия», Джордж де Форест Браш 1887 г Холст, масло. Размер: 53.3 × 50.8 см. Музей американского искусства Кристл-бриджес В течении продолжительного времени американский художник George de Forest Brush (1855—1941) жил среди коренных американцев. Он создалбольшую серию тематических картин, посвященных жизни коренных жителей Америки. Многие из этих работ публиковались в крупных периодических изданиях. Картину…
❤4
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @hunterkaleidoscope. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ловец Смыслов: Калейдоскоп Культур 🎭” (@hunterkaleidoscope), 102 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hunterkaleidoscope.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.