Channel
@humble_research
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
294subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001219426734 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @humble_research |
| Description | скромные люди пишут робко [приём контрибьюшонов — @ooiphoi и @r_matv] |
| Created | 16 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/humble_research |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 294 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 294 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Избирательный подход к самоцензуре. Charles L. T. Corsby et al., “Living With Injury: A Phenomenology of Sport Injury Rehabilitation,” Body & Society, ahead of print, January 22, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X251413522.
Fuller, Steve. “Analytic Philosophy’s Discovery of What It Can Be.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, January 27, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931261419594.
Хрю Graham Button, Harvey Sacks and Ethnomethodology: The Prospect of an Alternate and Adequate Sociology, (Routledge, 2025), 174
Добрый вечер, будьте здоровы Harold Garfinkel, in Proceedings of the Purdue Symposium on Ethnomethodology, ed. Richard J. Hill and Kathleen Stones Crittenden, Institute Monograph Series 1 (West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation, 1968), 4.
Сам такой. Gabe Durham, foreword to Breakout: Pilgrim in the Microworld, by David Sudnow, nouvelle ed., Boss Fight Books 22 (Los Angeles: Boss Fight Books, 2019), vii.
Вебер М. Вторая антикритика на «Дух капитализма» Часть I // Социологическое обозрение. 2025. Т. 24. № 2. С. 252–273.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Edited by P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, and Joachim Schulte. Rev. 4th ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 22e
2. (5.68e+8) Lynch, Michael. “Silence in Context: Ethnomethodology and Social Theory.” Human Studies 22, no. 2 (October 1, 1999): 211. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005440501638.
Emanuel A. Schegloff, “On ESP Puns,” in Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper, ed. Curtis D. LeBaron Phillip J. Glenn and Jenny Mandelbaum (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003), 531.
Leonidas Tsilipakos, “Winch’s Idea at Sixty-Five: Its Point and Implications for the Prospects of Sociology,” European Journal of Social Theory 27, no. 1 (2024): 116.
Опечатка убила воду Sharrock, Wes, and Graham Button. “All at Sea: The Use of Practical Formalisms in Yachting.” In Ethnomethodology at Play, edited by Peter Tolmie and Mark Rouncefield, 105–33. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 2013.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @humble_research. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
как день прошёл?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2021 to 13 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,084,215 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“хамбл рисёч” (@humble_research), 294 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/humble_research.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.