Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for hujjmin(хёджмин)🦅

Channel

hujjmin(хёджмин)🦅

@hujjminfr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

555subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001908765286
TypeChannel
Username@hujjminfr
Created4 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hujjminfr

Growth

5555615587 August 2026 — 561 subscribers7 August 2026 — 561 subscribers14 August 2026 — 555 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 554–562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:27555-6
7 Aug 2026, 06:32561no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:18561first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.0%
avg views ÷ 555 subscribers
Avg views / post
161
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
30.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held10 (20 April 202629 July 2026)
Views total322
Reactions total99
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

555 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15828.5%
🍌14526.1%
custom 53031648009167907167112.8%
custom 5305432028253017816509.01%
custom 5224567453450783602478.47%
❤‍🔥447.93%
custom 5251647101992990549173.06%
😭142.52%
💯61.08%
🍓30.541%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 555reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 10 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hujjminfr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 April 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC142 views45 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

привет го реквесты 🍌 ну скидывайте типа персов своих чо. понравится нарисую

21🍌10❤‍🔥9custom 53031648009167907165

28 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTC180 views54 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

полтора землекопа попросили так что вот вам скетчи. скоро закину камышки еще какие готовы😋

30🍌13custom 53031648009167907168custom 52245674534507836023

13 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC374 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

кстати если хотите сюда скетчей с щп маякните а то я просто так кидать стесняюсь

18🍌6custom 53031648009167907166custom 52245674534507836022

13 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC371 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

как бы мне не хотелось сказать что я готовлю супер мега арт, готовятся только камишки которых внезапно очень много птушто у меня очень мало денег😫 заказчики не бейте вилами что я так долго я все закончу правда очень постараюсь все закончить и наделать вам контент пишите пока че как дела хз...

24custom 530316480091679071610🍌7custom 52245674534507836025

26 Jun 2026, 08:32 UTC420 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

пацан к успеху шел не получилось не фартануло

custom 522456745345078360232❤‍🔥18😭14🍌6

22 Jun 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,830 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

всех с днем великой маши мышки🗝

custom 530316480091679071637❤‍🔥17🍌15💯6

14 May 2026, 13:17 UTC661 views63 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#ос привет это Алексей Кавайный я завел тикток💻 это кусочек лора моего оса пж лайк подписка. тв на последнем немного кровяка и тема насилия

🍌2917custom 525164710199299054912custom 52245674534507836025

11 May 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,540 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#NERDARLERTZINE_WIP #NERDARLERTZINE стоп стоп стоп это что випка в нердмин зин? твою мать, чувак, я сейчас взорвусь от крутости, нам надо поставить этому парню десятку🎀

🍌33custom 53054320282530178161311custom 52516471019929905495

3 May 2026, 17:14 UTC608 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#ос придумайте сюда какой-нибудь сюжет 🎀🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌 ааа я ничево не успеваю ааа дедлайны ааа хавате старую картинку🎀 рт/реакции??

custom 530543202825301781630🍌1312custom 53031648009167907165

20 Apr 2026, 17:24 UTC639 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

привет ребятке а вы не хотите три слотика на подобные портретики по 300 рублей🎀 3/3 закрыто!! вообще если хотите можно не просто портретик заказать.. ну это так...

25🍌13custom 53054320282530178167🍓3

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @hujjminfr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 383,652 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“hujjmin(хёджмин)🦅” (@hujjminfr), 555 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hujjminfr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.