Channel
@hudhud_cyber
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
263subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002037565677 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hudhud_cyber |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hudhud_cyber |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 263 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 258 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 258 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,596 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
‼️ BREAKING - A newly discovered #WordPress pre-auth XSS affects every version. XSS2Shell (CVE-2026-64638) can run attacker-controlled JS in a site's origin without a login. With a logged-in Administrator, one click, and required deployment conditions, it can be chained to PHP code execution. Update your WordPress sites ASAP 🠖 https://thehackernews.com/2026/08/new-wordpress-pre-auth-xss-could-lead.html
Сунъий интеллект ўз табиатидаги нарсагагина хавф солади. Демак, Сунъий интеллект фақат "сунъий инсон" га хавф солиши мумкин. Сунъийликнинг акси табиийлик эмас, балки ҳақиқатда тура билишдир. @Hamid_Sodiq
⚡ For some, Thursday is winding down. For others, it has just begun. For us, it means 30 more cybersecurity stories for this week’s #ThreatsDay Bulletin: • Odysseus RCE • Samsung takeover • AI proxyjacking • Chinese telecom footholds • ClickOnce backdoors • 846 npm packages • Pre-prompt code execution • XCSSET macOS upgrade • LLM pentesting lessons • Telegram takedown extortion • Signal multi-phone support • AI bug-…
Shuning uchun ham "Zero Trust" modeli har bir tashkilot uchun muhim sanaladi. Podcastning bu qismida korxona ishchisi o'zi ishlaydigan korxonani "extortion" qilgani ya'ni korxonaga tahdid qilgani. Korxonaning maxfiy ma'lumotlarini barchaga oshkor qilishgacha borgani haqida gap boradi. Asosiy xulosa 1. Zero Trust modeli Axborot Xavfsizligining eng muhim qismlaridan biri 2. Least privelege ya'ni faqatgina kerakli h…
https://youtu.be/JMaVTHUOMmA?si=KEIDJ5s1347SyJwc
;)
Сунъий интеллект базаси ёлғончи инсониятнинг ёлғон маълумотларидан иборат ва у, янги ялғончилар учун янги ялғонларни яратади. Қулашда ҳам "парвоз" бор. @Hamid_Sodiq
🚨 A suspected Chinese-speaking threat actor is targeting government networks across Central Asia with two backdoors that run mostly in memory. OctLurk and SilkLurk can steal credentials, collect email, scan networks, and load additional plugins, while LurkProxy routes traffic through compromised hosts. Inside the campaign: https://thehackernews.com/2026/08/suspected-chinese-speaking-hackers.html
O'rganish davomida qaydlarni(notelar) qanday olish bo'yicha kichik misol
ESC5 ADCS bir necha AD obyektiga tayanadi. Agar shulardan bittasini egallasangiz, butun PKI qulaydi. ESC5 — aynan shu "chekka" obyektlar ustidagi zaif ruxsatlar. ADCS'ning qo'shnilari (ESC5 nishonlari): ADCS serverining kompyuter obyekti - GenericAll → RBCD → serverni egallash ADCS serverining o'zi (RPC/DCOM) - Serverda Local Administrator huquqiga ega bo'lish CN=Public Key Services konteyneridagi har qanday oby…
====================================================== ESC7 ESC7 — bu access control oilasining eng kuchli a'zosi. ESC4'da shablon ustida huquqingiz bor edi; ESC7'da esa CA'ning o'zi ustida boshqaruv huquqingiz bor. Har bir CA'da ikkita muhim boshqaruv huquqi bor. Bular — CA'ning "xodimlari" rollari: ManageCA= CA ADMINISTRATORI(CA sozlamalarini o'zgartiradi) ManageCertificates = CERTIFICATE MANAGER / OFICER(kutay…
🎯 ESC10 — Case 1 (Kerberos murvati zaif) Shart: StrongCertificateBindingEnforcement = 0 (DC SID'ga umuman qaramaydi). Shablon oddiy bo'lsa ham bo'ladi (User). Rollar: blwasp = siz · user2 = qo'g'irchoq (GenericWrite bor) · Administrator = nishon 0. Huquqni tasdiqla (ixtiyoriy) — user2 ustida FullControl bormi? dacledit.py -action read -dc-ip <DC_IP> lab.local/blwasp:'Password123!' -principal blwasp -target user2 →…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hudhud_cyber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 862,226 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hudhud” (@hudhud_cyber), 263 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hudhud_cyber.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.