评论区炸了,兄弟们,明天恢复哈😭 炸得太厉害了,有能力的兄弟们可以看置顶支持一下,内部群的话不会炸,有多个备份。
❤31💋2🎉1

Channel
@huangyueguang
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
353,576subscribers
+1,902 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001444244654 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @huangyueguang |
| Description | 近期有骗子模仿我到处骗广告费,从不主动私聊,私聊的都是骗子,勿信!!!唯一联系方式:@Sxch8bot 【除此联系方式外都是骗子】 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/huangyueguang |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 353,576 | +352 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 353,224 | +447 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 352,777 | +598 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 352,179 | +366 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 351,813 | +139 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 351,674 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,107,400 |
| Reactions total | 1,007 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,007 reactions across 41 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 685 | 68.0% | |
| 👏 | 107 | 10.6% | |
| 😍 | 67 | 6.65% | |
| 💋 | 49 | 4.87% | |
| 🎉 | 39 | 3.87% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 3.08% | |
| 🌭 | 29 | 2.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,007reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
评论区炸了,兄弟们,明天恢复哈😭 炸得太厉害了,有能力的兄弟们可以看置顶支持一下,内部群的话不会炸,有多个备份。
❤31💋2🎉1
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7747754163
❤11💋8👍2
#留学生系列 #肛交 #口交 #母狗 #调教 这期合集内容主要为多个留学生反差婊出国上学被老外当作母狗一样玩弄调教,留学生圈子果然很乱! 全部视频总时长:11小时37分钟
❤55🌭7👏6😍4
#密嫂 #少妇 #熟女 #母狗 #反差婊 年少不知阿姨好,错把少女当作宝,微胖肉感熟女,天下第一骚,熟透了的骚穴淫水超级多! 全部视频总时长:3小时43分钟
❤28👏9🎉4
#专业操老外 #双飞 #3P #母狗 #约炮 也算是为国争光了,开着保时捷的富哥约各种高颜值大洋马做爱,一些俄罗斯妹子都被大鸡巴操哭了! 全部视频总时长:592小时12分钟
❤26😍5👏2
#宵夜 #自慰 #反差婊 #福利姬 #后入 高颜值大长腿网红福利姬,很骚很给力,用玉足给男人的肉棒足交,被扶着腰后入翘臀! 全部视频总时长:17小时37分钟
❤8🌭6🎉6
#sharemywife24hr #人妻 #绿帽 #群P #黑人 OnlyFans的极品淫妻母狗,来自台湾和老公天天玩群P,叫来黑人让他们的黑鸡巴轮流抽插屁眼肛交! 全部视频总时长:39小时32分钟
❤13👏2😍1
#SPGYMN #巨乳 #反差婊 #母狗 #双飞 myfans专约巨乳反差婊的博主。操的都是微胖天花板,双飞大奶子母狗乳摇超级带劲! 全部视频总时长:81小时30分钟
❤16👏12😍4
#野性の王国 #黑人 #母狗 #内射 #反差婊 很有意思的视频。像是看纪录片一样,母狗坐飞机去非洲被送给部落黑人做爱无套内射! 全部视频总时长:38小时13分钟
❤17👏5😍1
#眼镜妹合集 #反差婊 #母狗 #口交 #后入 有句古话说的好“天上飞机最高,地上眼镜最骚”,本合集全都是戴眼镜的反差婊做爱,很多经典,非常顶! 全部视频总时长:26小时05分钟
❤24😍6👍4
#PerfectGal #淫妻 #母狗 #绿帽 #群P 身材很好的极品反差婊,被调教的很淫乱如同母狗,3P、4P换妻群交户外露出,想怎么玩都可以,很配合! 全部视频总时长:8小时56分钟
❤8🌭3🎉2💋2
#05不吃香菜 #人妻 #母狗 #反差婊 #无套 颜值很高的一对夫妻,在床上激情做爱,深情口爆69做爱,蜜桃肥臀被老公无套狠操! 全部视频总时长:60小时37分钟
❤9😍5👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @huangyueguang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“你的黄月光合集” (@huangyueguang), 353,576 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huangyueguang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.