Channel
@htmlshitt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002772926618 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @htmlshitt |
| Description | Блог Lead SS-разработчика из Хельсинки Автор: @notmasterpoo_1 По рекламе: https://telega.in/channels/htmlshit/card?r=GLOiHluU или https://t.me/it_adv Чат: https://t.me/htmlshitchat №5001017849, https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/679b74f8dad2d930d2eaa978 |
| Created | 27 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/htmlshitt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 16 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 16 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 27 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👨💻 | 28 | 38.9% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 20.8% | |
| 👾 | 14 | 19.4% | |
| 🗿 | 13 | 18.1% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2025 to 6 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjcGENdL | 1 | 6 August 2025 | 6 August 2025 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2025 to 6 August 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
#фишка дня Как убедиться, что ваш switch покрывает все кейсы, а default остаётся только на случай косяков в рантайме? Очень просто! Два варианта: 1. Используем never, от Кори Хауса: interface Dog { kind: "dog"; favoriteToy: string; } interface Parrot { kind: "parrot"; knowsWords: number; } type Pet = Dog | Parrot; function logPetTalent(pet: Pet) { switch (pet. kind) { case "dog": return con…
👨💻2👍1👎1👾1🗿1
😈 Data Dojo | Питер | 26 августа Это мероприятие Яндекса для сообщества ML-специалистов с обсуждением трендов, разбором реальных задач из соревнований и прикладными кейсами. Зачем участвовать: — послушать выступления экспертов: Николай Савушкин, руководитель команды рекомендательных технологий в Поиске, расскажет про генеративные нейросети в рекомендательных системах Яндекса, а Алексей Колесов, руководитель команд…
👨💻2👍1👎1👾1🗿1
@container scroll-state(stuck: top) { .pip { width: 200px; transform: translate(-50%, 0%) translate(calc(50vw - (50% + 1rem)), calc(100vh - (100% + 1rem))); } }
👨💻2👍1👾1🗿1
Social media icon Значки социальных сетей. Реализовано с помощью CSS. ⤷ Забрать код @HtmlGram1 | #css
👨💻2👍1👾1🗿1
#codepen дня Ну что, кажется, настало то время, когда для стилизации радиокнопок и чекбоксов не нужно больше изгаляться с input:checked+i. Это освобождает мозг и руки для более приятных вещей. Итак, смотрим на пример от Джона Кантнера: https://codepen.io/alinaki/pen/ExMXbqz 1. Для начала, обнуляем все браузерные стили и предположения браузера об внешнем виде радиокнопок вообще через appearance: none. 2. Я вам это…
👨💻3👍1🗿1
Electric strings Электрический шар со струнами, который преследует движение курсора. Реализовано с помощью JavaScript. ⤷ Забрать код @htmlshitt | #JavaScript
👨💻2👍1👾1🗿1
#фишка дня Надоело угадывать высоту строки, чтобы текст стал высотой ровно в прописную букву? Say no more! line-height: 1cap; И вы великолепны. P. S. ещё более вы великолепны, если Safari версии больше 17.2 включительно. #css #бородач
👨💻2👍1👾1🗿1
Space 404 Космически неверный адрес. Реализовано с помощью SCSS и JS. ⤷ Забрать код @HtmlGram1 | #scss #JavaScript
👨💻2👍1👾1🗿1
#фишка дня Иногда встаёт задача не просто проиллюстрировать статью, но обрезать (кропнуть) исходное изображение. И желательно так, чтобы результат был адаптивен и адекватно реагировал на масштабирование. Джейк Арчибальд предлагает решение на SVG и foreignObject: https://jsbin.com/yiwipay/edit?html,css,output Вообще, весьма красиво. Да, можно генерировать кропы на сервере, но это, как минимум, лишние телодвижения. …
👨💻2👍1👾1🗿1
Video, posted without a caption
👨💻2👍1👾1🗿1
#фишка дня Иногда возникает задача поставить перевод строки после строчного (inline) элемента. Без <br/>, без преобразования элемента в блочный. На помощь приходят псевдоэлементы. Значение свойства content — «\A» — это Unicode-символ 0x00000A, который, внезапно, являет собой перевод строки. Ну и чтобы он сработал, нам стоит прямо указать браузеру на необходимость сохранения переводов строк. Что это даёт? Ну, нап…
👨💻2👍1👾1🗿1
<!DOCTYPE html>
👨💻2👾2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @htmlshitt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“programmer🧑💻” (@htmlshitt), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/htmlshitt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.