Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Эксперименты в социальных наука | Анонсы

@hsesocscienceexperiments

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

59subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003939159812
TypeChannel
Username@hsesocscienceexperiments
Created20 April 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/hsesocscienceexperiments

Growth

598 August 2026 — 59 subscribers10 August 2026 — 59 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58–60 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 06:0059no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:3059first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2972.5%
1025.0%
🤔12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jun 2026, 21:42 UTC172 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Друзья, высылаю синтаксис с нашего предыдущего занятия. Запись выложу в ближайшее время :)

❤‍🔥2

27 Jun 2026, 13:34 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Друзья, кто хочет присутствовать на семинаре онлайн, подключайтесь к встрече: https://telemost.360.yandex.ru/j/3811156809

1

17 Jun 2026, 15:38 UTC144 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Когда было бы удобно прийти на семинар на следующей неделе?

  1. 2350%
  2. 2450%
  3. 2567%
  4. 2650%
  5. 2783%
  6. 2850%
  7. 2950%
  8. 3050%

The shares total 450%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Jun 2026, 13:18 UTC119 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, напоминаем, что уже завтра, 17 июня в 16:20 в 416 аудитории на Мясницкой ул., 20 состоится семинар по анализу экспериментальных данных. Для работы с языком R нам необходимо произвести установку самого языка и пространства, в котором мы будем работать (Rstudio) . Скачивать и устанавливать нужно в следующем порядке: 1. Ссылка на скачивание языка R - https://cran.rstudio.com . Для своей системы будут свои ссыл

15 Jun 2026, 12:19 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Друзья, на связи Никита. Напоминаю, что мой семинар состоится 17 июня в 16:20 на М20, аудиторию согласосываем. Прошу по возможности ознакомиться (хотя бы по диагонали или прогнать через нейронку 😉) со следующими текстами перед нашим семинаром: 1. Глава 2 из Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. W. W. Norton. –> здесь базовая терминология вроде ATE для анализа

2

12 Jun 2026, 11:57 UTC139 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, добрый день! Рады сообщить о нашем новом семинаре! На этот раз обсуждение будет посвящено вопросам анализа результатов эксперимента: будет рассмотрен анализ различных типов эксперимента, включая классические с контрольной и тритмент- группами, факторные и конджоинтные. Изучим основные методы, дискуссии и вместе поработаем с реальными данными. Семинар пройдет 17 июня с 16:20 до 18:20 в корпусе на Мясницкой

❤‍🔥52

28 May 2026, 18:10 UTC200 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Коллеги, добрый вечер! К сожалению, завтрашний семинар в связи с загруженностью и защитами дипломов, мы не сможем провести. 5 июня в 16:40 будет семинар посвященный факторным экспериментам. Я его проведу и вышлю литературу для подготовки. 16 июня семинар проведет Никита Иваненко с анализом экспериментальных данных.

23 May 2026, 15:29 UTC213 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, добрый день! Рады сообщить о следующем сдвоенном семинаре, который пройдет 29 мая в 16:20-19:40. Первая часть будет посвящена обсуждению факторных опросных экспериментов. Мы обсудим их виды и особенности самого дизайна. Вторая часть будет посвящена анализу экспериментальных данных (практикум). Данную часть проведет Никита Иваненко. Предварительной подготвки для посещения этих семинаров не требуется.

5❤‍🔥3🤔1

23 Apr 2026, 18:43 UTC266 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, добрый день! Рады сообщить о первом семинаре! Он пройдет 27 апреля с 16:20 по 19:40 в корпусе на Мясницкой в гибридном формате. Аудитория: M11/323 Семинар будет состоять из вводной лекции, посвященной методологическим вопросам, и обсуждения статей с примерами исследований. Материалы к семинарам доступны здесь: https://disk.360.yandex.ru/d/IJMl42OP3VTy6g Семинарский листок доступен здесь: https://docs.go

❤‍🔥10

23 Apr 2026, 18:42 UTC222 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Коллеги, добрый день! Приглашаем вас на серию семинаров по экспериментам. Рады сообщить о первом семинаре! Семинары проводятся при поддержке Центра академического развития студентов в рамках Конкурса научных семинаров студентов Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики» Эксперименты в социальных науках являются основным методом для установления причинно-следственных связей, но нынче на

❤‍🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @hsesocscienceexperiments. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jun 2026, 15:38 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

Когда было бы удобно прийти на семинар на следующей неделе?

  1. 2350%
  2. 2450%
  3. 2567%
  4. 2650%
  5. 2783%
  6. 2850%
  7. 2950%
  8. 3050%

The shares total 450%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 28 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,172,105 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Эксперименты в социальных наука | Анонсы” (@hsesocscienceexperiments), 59 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hsesocscienceexperiments.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.