Channel
@hronikigorodov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
73subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002456797724 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hronikigorodov |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hronikigorodov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 73 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 72 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 72 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (16 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 349 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
44 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5433667790227658959 | 20 | 45.5% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5407024153880458484 | 5 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5472139766508064398 | 4 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5454392669583205231 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| custom 5307566485265219090 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 4.55% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀 Участвовала тут в сломаном планшете... Очень весело получилось смотреть итоги, так что марш на канал Spar смотреть. 😀 А на своей части немного развлекалась с текстурной кистью. 😀
custom 54336677902276589593
🍑Итоги сломанного планшета 🍑 То, как изменился характер изначального рисунка, просто поразительно! Спасибо всем за этот опыт, было очень приятно и интересно ❤️ Постепенно будут выходить отдельные посты с рисуночками, указанием авторов и тгк❗️ Приятного просмотра 🥤
❤1custom 54336677902276589591
#Арт #Минск 🌙 Коля в оттенках красного выглядит как вампир. Так что... буду считать это артом к вампирской АУ. 💐 Рисовать только красным довольно интересно. Свет кажется горящим. 💐 🔥 P.S. Реакции/Предложения кого делать дальше приветствуются.
❤4custom 54336677902276589592
#Арт #Берлин 🌙 Монохромный эксперимент над Берхардом. Люблю монохром, он успокаивает в процессе. 🔵 Предлагаю небольшой актив, вы в комментариях предлагаете персонажей и цвет, а я делаю с ними монохромные арты. Будем собирать цветовой круг. (При большом желании можете и рефференсы поз кидать, не обязательно портреты). 💐 🔵 P.S. Реакции/Комментарии/Репосты приветствуются.
custom 54721397665080643984custom 54543926695832052313❤🔥1
#Арт #Штутгарт Штутгарт до того как изобрели машины... Чёрный конь это река Неккар. 📝Первоначально на месте современного города был создан конный завод для разведения боевых лошадей. Название поселения происходит от староверхненемецкого слова Stutengarten, что буквально означает «сад кобыл» или конюшня.
custom 54336677902276589593
💜🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠💜 Коллаж с Орлеан, потому что её внешность мне очень понравилась, на день Франции. И немного хэдканонов/фактов, которые показались мне интересными. 💜Помимо лент часто вылетает в волосы жемчуг или тонкие украшения из золота. Сами причёски простые, но за счёт украшений выглядят очень красиво. 💜Официальный девиз французского Орлеана звучит как «Между небом и Луарой». Историческим же девизом города во времен…
custom 54336677902276589594❤🔥1
#Арт #Таллин #Рига #Вильнюс #Калининград 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ~ Доделала наконец-то этот рисунок с глазами прибалтов. Посмотрел на прошлые части с поляками и белорусами, на мой взгляд глаза стали получаться лучше(осталось на большие работы навык перенести)... Реакции/Комментарии, надо актив воскрешать, а то незаметно что нас тут больше становится.
custom 54336677902276589593custom 53075664852652190902
#Арт #Мюнхен Маленький Эрих для ответа в Аск. Ещё без очков, с волосами подлинее и с чётким пониманием чего он хочет(стать столицей объединённой Баварии). Постепенно возвращаюсь в активное состояние, заканчиваю с дедлайнами в других местах и начинаю делать что-то новое.
custom 54336677902276589594
❌ 🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤 🔠🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🤩 🖤🖤 меня зовут Риша 🤩🤩 я занимаюсь различными видами творчества (рисование, вязание, эдитинг) и делюсь своими работами в этом тгк. Основной фандом: пвл 🖤🖤 если тебя интересует подобное, обязательно заглядывай посмотреть буду безмерно рада каждому 🤩 ❌ @knittingrisdhbot – анон @user9803583115784 – тт
Ищешь 🔠🔠🔠🔠 из фандома 🔠🔠🔠 который даст трезвую оценку твоему хэду? Или... Не знаешь как правильно состряпать хэд? Абсолютно все хэдканонщики игнорят живое общение? Что ж. Тогда приветствую на своем 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 по хэдканонам пвл. (Повесть временных лет) Меня зовут Эмо и я самый настоящий 🔠🔠🔠 фандома. С самого начала, 21 года наблюдаю как растет скилл автора, как развивается фандом, и даже ездил на ярмарки в Питере. 😳 Я …
Всех с окончанием июня. Небольшое объявление и планы на будущее. 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 К летней встрече в Питере подготовила небольшой набор брелков. Меня, к сожалению, не будет, но на сходке мерч можно будет купить у организаторов. Купить мерч можно будет не только на сходке, но только с началом осени. Я всё лето нахожусь в другом месте, и тут есть проблемы с отправкой чего угодно.
А у меня день рождения сегодня😋 Теперь можно все, что до этого было нельзя (сесть тоже можно) Я очень рада что этот канал растет со мной и я могу проследить прогресс, ну круто же. И что людям нравится, что тут делается. Хочется пожелать спокойной жизни, а то в пробке во время экзамена чё то не очень спокойно 🥰
🍓2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @hronikigorodov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 559,083 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hronikigorodov named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rⲍⲉⲥⲍⲣⲟⲋⲣⲟⳑⲓⲧⲁ” (@hronikigorodov), 73 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hronikigorodov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.