Channel
@hrg8889
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
135subscribers
-36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003443755324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hrg8889 |
| Created | 27 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hrg8889 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 135 | -36 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 171 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 171 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 27 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 6 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#报告模板 【所属群组】（东莞）红人馆 【所在地区】东城 【老师艺名】小叶子 【老师联系】@a746447454 【验证留名】68 【验证日期】12.5 【上课价位】700 【人照几分】8 【服务过程】提前约好老师，按指引，顺利到达。进门聊天，热情洋溢，妆后老师颜值不错，细支硕果，身材完美，房间温馨背景音乐柔和。老师全方面帮洗，无需动手，洗完帮拿拖鞋擦干。一同入床，老师骚气满满，开始服务，舔胸过渡，口活及大三角区足足舔了有十分钟左右。老师胸很软，手感不错，戴套进入，包裹性满满，尤其入口处摩擦很有感觉。换后入式，老师腰臀比不错，肉肉的PP撞击下很快释放。温柔细致，继续闲聊，不催不赶。满意的走人下次再来 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给红人馆小红帽（@hrg88bot ） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明）聊天群：https://t.m…
❤1
#报告模板 【所属群组】（东莞）红人馆 【所在地区】大朗 【老师艺名】奶酥 【榜单链接】@pingp6 【验证留名】啦啦啦啦 【验证日期】12.3 【上课价位】600 【人照几分】8 【服务过程】颜值可以，洗澡完擦背，妹子也会找话题，不用担心冷场，进屋之后，开始做b面，指甲非常有感觉，过水吸力也挺足的，A面的时候几乎都坚持不住，刺激性太大了，总体是一次不错的出击 写出击报告可获得50积分！（为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，需要截图与老师聊天记录，还请各位真实评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给红人馆小红帽（@hrg88bot ） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明）聊天群：https://t.me/dgxyl
🏆1
#报告模板 【所属群组】（东莞）红人馆 【所在地区】东城 【老师艺名】小白虎 【老师联系】@chunbaihu20 【验证留名】1123 【验证日期】12.3 【上课价位】700 【人照几分】8 【服务过程】和老师约好时间，到附近后遥控上楼，老师和照片九分像，交完水费后和老师共浴，老师的小舌头非常灵活，水中萧做的非常舒服，课表上的服务都有做，服务很好很满意，然后老师戴上tt女上开干，和老师激情舌吻，猛猛的做着活塞运动，老师来感觉了疯狂摇摆，叫声迷人，来了一次高潮，最后我也在老师的帮助下成功出水，做完后还帮忙冲洗干净，老师很健谈，服务非常OK。 自个陈述……发出击报告获取学分，用积分兑换白嫖卷和现金红包！ 写出击报告可获得50积分！（为了避免恶意刷好评或者差评，需要截图与老师聊天记录，还请各位真实评价吧） 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给红人馆小红帽（@hrg88bot ） 并须附：确认可…
#报告模板 【所属群组】（东莞）红人馆 【所在地区】 【老师艺名】 【联系老师】 【验证留名】 【验证日期】 【上课价位】 【人照几分】 【服务过程】 打分标准:6分及格，7分漂亮，8分优质，9分无脑冲 ⚠️报告提交给红人馆小红帽（@hrg88bot ） 并须附：确认可添加的联系方式聊天等截图，遥控上楼部分聊天截图、付款截图（如现金，请说明）聊天群：https://t.me/dgxyl
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @hrg8889. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 770,399 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“（东莞）红人馆报告榜” (@hrg8889), 135 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hrg8889.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.