https://youtube.com/shorts/6Qz0WXSCElU
🔥3

Channel
@hrbp_unicorn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
147subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002000174222 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hrbp_unicorn |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hrbp_unicorn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 147 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 149 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 150 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 150 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 10 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
45 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 40.0% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 26.7% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 17.8% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 20 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtube.com/shorts/6Qz0WXSCElU
🔥3
Тут ответ на вопрос, почему я молчу в этом паблике) https://youtube.com/shorts/Oos8XUHKlh4
🔥3❤1
А вы как бы поступили?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой найм эффективнее — быстрый или выверенный? 👀 Представьте: 💼 У вас срочно освобождается позиция тимлида. Есть два пути: 🔹 Вариант А — быстро закрываете вакансию сильным кандидатом с рынка. Подходит по навыкам, но нет стопроцентного «культурного совпадения». 🔹 Вариант B — продолжаете искать «своего», возможно 1–2 месяца. Идеальный матч по духу, но риски срыва дедлайнов.
🤔1
Когда вроде выходной… но нет
😁4
Часто к нам приходят с запросом: «Нам нужны сильные люди, потому что команда не тянет». Но когда начинаем разбираться — оказывается, что дело не только в команде. А в том, в какие условия попадает человек: – нет ясных целей; – задачи меняются каждый день; – один делает всё, трое смотрят; – решения зависят от настроения; – фидбек раз в полгода, если повезёт. 🔥 Даже самый сильный кандидат в такой среде быстро выгори…
❤6👏1
Почему не стоит тянуть с обратной связью кандидату 💬 Руководители часто говорят: «Ну мы ещё думаем, позже отпишем кандидату» — и в итоге… упускают сильных людей. Вот что происходит, когда вы не даёте обратную связь 5–7 дней: – кандидат теряет интерес или уходит в другой оффер; – у него формируется негатив к бренду (да, и он расскажет друзьям) – вы получаете репутацию компании, которая «морозит»; – и сами тратите бо…
🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Переходите по ссылке👇 https://vc.ru/id1157025/2118084-soft-skills-kak-my-proveryaem-ih-u-kandidatov-i-zachem-voobshe-eto-delat
❤3
🚨 «Ищем обычного менеджера. Почему никто не откликается?!» 👋 Привет, друзья! Иногда к нам приходят с таким запросом: «Нам не нужен кто-то супер-особенный. Просто нормальный менеджер, офис, зп в рынке. Почему нет кандидатов?» А вот почему: 🔸 Ваша “обычная” вакансия выглядит так же, как 147 других 🔸 Описание скучное, шаблонное, без смысла 🔸 ЗП «в рынке», но кандидаты сейчас выбирают не только деньгами 🔸 Не раскрыты…
🔥3👍2
Какой аромат выберете вы?☺️
😁4
Сегодня — разбор, как на самом деле принимать такие решения 💡 На что я смотрю, когда клиент сомневается между двумя финалистами: 🔗Контекст задачи Нужно «прямо сейчас включиться и делать»? Тогда берем опыт. Можно чуть дольше пообучать, но вырастить своего? Тогда ставка на мотивацию. 🔗Тип команды Команда тихая и структурная? Там органично вольётся спокойный профи. А если у вас драйвовая, неформальная культура — не в…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @hrbp_unicorn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы как бы поступили?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кого бы вы выбрали?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 20 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Валерия Арчугова | HR для бизнеса” (@hrbp_unicorn), 147 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hrbp_unicorn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.