Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ®Переходник®

Channel

®Переходник®

@hr_united

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

465subscribers

-2,851 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002095950681
TypeChannel
Username@hr_united
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hr_united

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

4653,3161,890.510 September 2026 — 3,316 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,316 subscribers14 October 2026 — 488 subscribers21 October 2026 — 485 subscribers28 October 2026 — 482 subscribers3 November 2026 — 465 subscribers10 September 20263 November 2026
6 measurements spanning 54 days, net -2,851. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–3,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 21:25465-17
28 Oct 2026, 17:17482-3
21 Oct 2026, 07:37485-3
14 Oct 2026, 04:49488-2,828
10 Sept 2026, 12:223,316no change
10 Sept 2026, 11:473,316first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 2 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

165 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6740.6%
🔥4225.5%
👀2012.1%
👍148.48%
💯106.06%
😁74.24%
custom 523574768711396135942.42%
custom 523572880214275960510.606%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 24 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2025, 06:01 UTC≈1,680 views19 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Процесс адаптации вроде бы выстроен, но как понять, все ли с ним в порядке? На что ориентироваться? В дополнение к нашему недавнему посту, читайте в карточках на какие метрики стоит обратить внимание ☝️ Как оцениваете процесс адаптации в своей компании? Поделитесь опытом в комментариях 💬

❤12👍5💯2

17 Sept 2025, 06:03 UTC≈1,450 views21 reactionsread 10 September 2026

Цифра дня: 56% 🔥 Именно столько россиян поддерживают идею 4-дневной рабочей недели. Интересное исследование от SuperJob показывает, что желание работать меньше растет: за последние годы доля сторонников 4-дневки среди экономически активного населения увеличилась. (В апреле 2021 года "за" были 39%). Что говорят цифры: 🔵Больше всего "за" женщины (62%), а вот мужчины чуть скромнее (51%). 🔵Молодежь (до 35 лет) активн…

❤11😁6👀3custom 52357288021427596051

16 Sept 2025, 09:16 UTC≈1,140 views20 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

“Кто-нибудь, помогите новенькому освоиться на работе, хорошо?🥺” В реальности за такой фразой кроется плохо выстроенный процесс адаптации. Адаптация – это путь, который должен пройти новый специалист, чтобы влиться в коллектив и начать продуктивно работать, принося организации прибыль. Это не просто инструктаж по технике безопасности и выдача пропуска, а комплекс мер, направленных на интеграцию нового члена команды. …

❤8🔥6👀3custom 52357476871139613593

10 Sept 2025, 06:04 UTC922 views11 reactionsread 10 September 2026

Хотели бы пройти психологический тест при устройстве на работу?👀 У части кандидатов такой этап отбора вызывает негативные эмоции. Особенно если они искренне не понимают, зачем он нужен и как результаты теста повлияют на решение о приёме на работу. 😱 Почему психологические тесты могут не работать в рекрутинге? 🔵Этот метод оценки не может со 100% точностью предсказать, как человек будет работать. Часть тестов оценив…

❤5💯4👍2

5 Sept 2025, 12:08 UTC902 viewsread 10 September 2026
Poll

Что думаете про социальные сети?

  1. Соц. сети — это личное48%
  2. Соц. сети — это хороший способ проверить адекватность человека52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Sept 2025, 12:03 UTC909 views53 reactionsread 10 September 2026

«НОРМ или НЕ ОЧЕНЬ» 👀 Работодатель изучает социальные сети кандидатов. ❤️ — Норм 🔥 — Не очень Почему? Пишите в комментариях 🤍

🔥32❤21

5 Sept 2025, 06:02 UTC867 views19 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Video

Срывали дедлайны? 🔥 — нет, всегда всё выполняю вовремя 👀 — было)

👀14🔥4custom 52357476871139613591

4 Sept 2025, 06:05 UTC894 views8 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Слишком хорош: почему некоторые компании боятся нанимать оверквалифайд-специалистов? Оверквалифайд-специалист – кандидат, опыт и навыки которого выше требуемой должности. Чего опасается работодатель? 🔵Многие не берут таких специалистов, полагая, что им будет скучно и неинтересно работать. У такого сотрудника быстро снизится мотивация, и он уволится. 🔵Есть еще одно распространенное мнение: специалист, навыки которог…

❤5👍2💯1

2 Sept 2025, 06:03 UTC712 views14 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Конкретика в описании вакансии всегда лучше общих, клишированных фраз. Откликнется кандидат или нет? Зависит от текста. Собрали для Вас фразы, которые могут отпугнуть потенциальных сотрудников. 🚩 А какие у вас красные флаги в вакансиях? 💬

❤5👍5💯3😁1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @hr_united. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Sept 2025, 12:08 UTCAnonymous Poll93 voters

Что думаете про социальные сети?

  1. Соц. сети — это личное48%
  2. Соц. сети — это хороший способ проверить адекватность человека52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 24 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CryptoJobs - работа в криптовалюте
@workers_tg · 33,479
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“®Переходник®” (@hr_united), 465 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hr_united.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.