Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

How to LinkedIn

@howtoLinkedin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

622subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002370185906
TypeChannel
Username@howtoLinkedin
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/howtoLinkedin

Growth

622623622.57 Aug 2026, 16:57 — 623 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:01 — 623 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:02 — 622 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:578 Aug 2026, 08:02
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 622–623 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:02622-1
8 Aug 2026, 03:01623no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:57623first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 44s
Average length
1m 22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6248.4%
🔥3930.5%
😁107.81%
❤‍🔥97.03%
🥰53.91%
👍21.56%
🤔10.781%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 30 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 18 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @howtoLinkedin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 August 2025 to 30 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2025, 19:22 UTC≈3,450 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💳Неожиданный способ монетизации LinkedIn — как за 15 минут заработать на бутерброды с икрой в буфете Большого театра: платные опросы. Способ работал в 2022, работает сейчас, выплаты в рублях и в валюте 💱 Причем, как видите на моих примерах со скриншотов, это входящие запросы. А чтобы получать такие адресные, фокусные, релевантные и высокомаржинальные входящие запросы — надо всего лишь грамотно настроить и упакова

🔥156😁2

20 Sept 2025, 11:03 UTC≈2,570 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

‼️Является ли LinkedIn запрещенной в РФ организацией? Давайте наконец определимся с терминами. И пожалуйста, очень вас прошу, оставьте эту информацию при себе, чтобы информация осталась актуальной. - Заблокирован ли LinkedIn в РФ? - Да, потому что это международная компания и хранят информацию они на серверах зарубежом. - Что же делать? - Использовать сервисы типа ВасилийПетрНиколай. —- - Является ли LinkedIn эк

6🔥4

17 Sept 2025, 16:58 UTC≈1,710 views12 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

⬆️ это в том числе для тех, кто рассказывает мне, что у них нет никаких дипломов и сертификатов, мол на LinkedIn прикрепить. Тут двух зайцев одной палкой академией можно закрыть. И нейронкам обучиться, и самый востребованный нынче скилл подтвердить. А ещё и Английский подтянуть в процессе. Читкот!👌я фигни не посоветую, но буду рада увидеть реакции✨🔥🫶 Про миссию помню, скоро будет

❤‍🔥93

17 Sept 2025, 16:45 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SuskyoursVideo

Самый мощный ускоритель прогресса сейчас — ИИ, тут вряд ли кто-то спорить будет. Так вот если кто-то хотел быстро, но основательно разобраться с нейронками, и в идеале ещё сертификатик получить, и ещё и безоплатно, как мы любим — то вот свежачок: Академия по нейронкам от OpenAI. Это те самые, которые тот самый ChatGPT придумали. Регистрация открыта! А вы ещё стираете Тайд?..

14 Sept 2025, 17:40 UTC≈1,160 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Про методологию поиска миссии и точного позиционирования отклик увидела, расскажу 👌 Но не раннее, чем закроете KPI в 25 ✨🔥 жалких реакций в прошлом посте с офигенным инструментом Telegram Calendar bot А то мы не договоримся. Я люблю взаимный энергообмен. А вы?😏

🔥10

13 Sept 2025, 19:10 UTC≈1,000 views13 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026

🌌Методология как найти миссию и чёткое позиционирование Все гениальное изящно в своей простоте — есть такой коучинговый инструмент «Пирамида логических уровней», через который я в основном работаю над позиционированием личных брендов. Это просто ряд вопросов, которые вам задает человек и выковыривает из вас словами через рот: - Что вы на самом деле делаете - Как вы это делаете - Для кого - Зачем (миссия) - И кто В

🔥76

13 Sept 2025, 17:05 UTC804 views2 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @olyaterentyevaliveVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

2

13 Sept 2025, 17:04 UTC770 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @olyaterentyevaliveVoice message

#голосимпульса - формат, где делимся полезными инструментами и кейсами предпринимателей специалист по LinkedIn-продвижению @Polina_Lamponi рассказала, зачем предпринимателю использовать эту сеть для выхода на глобальную бизнес-аудиторию слушать на х1,5 • бизнес-аудитория без токсичности • ключевики индексируются автоматически • бесплатное продвижение сообществ • закрытые группы для комьюнити • профиль сразу н

7

8 Sept 2025, 15:49 UTC771 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

А вы все ещё не посмотрели Мастер-класс? Говорят, бери и делай) и правда классно получается!

🔥3👍2

8 Sept 2025, 15:47 UTC668 viewsread 8 August 2026

Спасибо за запись МК, я послушала, очень высокая плотность информации на единицу времени)) Надо сразу брать и делать

3 Sept 2025, 08:21 UTC717 views3 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

А я говорила! У меня про это как раз TED talk будет, и даже на церемонии Оскара эта проблема с именами подсвечивается 👆 Плюс все же слышали про Kiki и Buba?

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @howtoLinkedin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“How to LinkedIn” (@howtoLinkedin), 622 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/howtoLinkedin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.