Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Розмари Турман | How Fashion Works

Channel

Розмари Турман | How Fashion Works

@howfashionworks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,399subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001491049638
TypeChannel
Username@howfashionworks
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/howfashionworks

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,3893,4113,4006 August 2026 — 3,411 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,411 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,409 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,405 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,403 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,407 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,403 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,398 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,394 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,389 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,390 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,392 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,399 subscribers3,3996 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,386–3,414 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 23:373,399+7
13 Sept 2026, 10:013,392+2
9 Sept 2026, 07:583,390+1
3 Sept 2026, 13:573,389-5
30 Aug 2026, 22:273,394-4
28 Aug 2026, 08:423,398-5
22 Aug 2026, 11:163,403-4
19 Aug 2026, 05:423,407+4
15 Aug 2026, 19:443,403-2
12 Aug 2026, 17:123,405-4
6 Aug 2026, 08:403,409-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:453,411no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:103,411first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

241 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11447.3%
👍5623.2%
❤‍🔥3514.5%
🔥239.54%
🥰72.90%
👏52.07%
🤗10.415%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC242 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот и август подоспел, а это значит пришло время пробежаться по своему списку целей на лето и вспомнить, что вы еще не успели сделать…и прочитать наш традиционный дайджест 😎 Что у нас нового? 💋 Продолжается набор на мою авторскую программу «Тренд-аналитик в индустрии моды» в Британской высшей школе дизайна. Старт обучения — 17 октября. 💋11 июля состоялась защита выпуска программы «Инструменты тренд-аналитики для ра

6❤‍🔥2👍2

Signed Розмари Турман

30 Jul 2026, 09:21 UTC270 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня — тело как поле общественных дискуссий Последние годы особенно ярко показывают нам, что тело — это уже не только вопрос красоты и дисциплины. Оземпик, пластическая хирургия, фильтры, искусственный интеллект, бодипозитив, биохакинг, культ молодости — все это становится частью большого разговора о свободе выбора, медицинской этике, технологиях и социальных ожиданиях. Тело вновь оказывается одним из главных куль

13👍7🔥3

Signed Розмари Турман

30 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC367 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Порой кажется, что схватка бодипозитив vs Оземпик с нами навечно, но чтобы немного приземлить эту тему, предлагаю вам вспомнить в рубрике #hfw_историческаядеталь о том, что отношение к телу никогда не было однородным. На протяжении всей истории тело выступало маятником: то идеалом, то объектом контроля, то показателем статуса, то полем политических и культурных споров. Менялись религии, государства, экономика и техн

14❤‍🔥5👍3

Signed Розмари Турман

29 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC272 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

11🔥8🥰7

Signed Розмари Турман

29 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC270 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @textile_asia

Друзья, начинаем прямой эфир с Розмари Турман - присоеденияйтесь! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1x8GvTJS7RE

8

Signed Розмари Турман

28 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC279 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @textile_asiaPhoto

🎙 29 июля в 10:00 (МСК) на YouTube-канале TextilePro новый подкаст с автором с Розмари Турман - тренд-аналитиком, куратором профильного направления в Британской высшей школе дизайна, автором Telegram-канала How Fashion Works Поговорим о моде не как о красивых вещах, а как о языке культуры, экономики и общества. В этом выпуске обсудим: - как отличить настоящий тренд от вирусного шума - кто сегодня действительно ф

10👍6🤗1

Signed Розмари Турман

28 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC250 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кажется, мы давно не встречались? Завтра в 10.00 предлагаю это исправить!) Присоединяйтесь

❤‍🔥4👍3👏2

Signed Розмари Турман

27 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC323 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В моих учениках практически на любом курсе есть стилисты, хорошо понимаю их потребности и возможности. И когда консультирую бренды, часто говорю, что канал работы со стилистами недооценен. Они могут помочь не только познакомить клиентов с брендом и продать здесь и сейчас, но и планомерно работают с восприимчивостью аудитории к трендам, расширяют представление людей об актуальной стилизации. Важно помогать этим сторон

11👍3❤‍🔥2

Signed Розмари Турман

24 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC387 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вместе с Вероникой Никифоровой, автором блога (Не)критично, собрали для вас пять книг, после которых смотришь на искусство иначе 🥺 Теория искусства пользуется незаслуженной репутацией скучного предмета. На самом деле лучшие тексты об искусстве написаны людьми, которых что-то всерьез задело, и которые не смогли промолчать. Каждая из пяти книг в этой подборке умещается в один вечер. Но они из тех, после которых замеч

👍9❤‍🔥7🔥7

Signed Розмари Турман

22 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC388 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В блоге вышел большой материал про прошедший кутюрный сезон осень-зима’26 💅 После Недель высокой моды у многих стабильно возникает один и тот же вопрос: зачем следить за кутюром, если большинство этих вещей никогда не попадет в магазины? В новом материале разбираю: 💋 почему haute couture остается важной частью индустрии и что именно в нем интересно тренд-аналитику 💋 как устроена система высокой моды: кто может пока

12👍5🔥5

Signed Розмари Турман

20 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC422 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Собрали в Британке небольшой, но полезный материал о том почему взгляд на происходящее тренд-аналитика отличается от прочих. Читать тут

👍124❤‍🔥3

Signed Розмари Турман

18 Jul 2026, 14:34 UTC494 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если вам кажется, что с трендами что-то не так, то вам не кажется 🙂 Они действительно меняют свое «поведение» — планируем разобраться с этим осенью в Британке на усиленной по сравнению с прошлыми запусками программе «Тренд-аналитик в индустрии моды». И главное, теперь официально студенты получают диплом о переквалификации 😘 Списки от блогеров и статистика оттенков от Tag-walk — это не тренд-аналитика. Когда перед ва

12❤‍🔥5👏3👍1

Signed Розмари Турман

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @howfashionworks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fashion Factory School
@hacking_fashion · 33,556
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Olga Krayzman
@olgakrayzman · 25,821
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Розмари Турман | How Fashion Works” (@howfashionworks), 3,399 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/howfashionworks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.