Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net -170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,608–6,829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 00:36
6,633
-5
4 Nov 2026, 14:31
6,638
-5
1 Nov 2026, 21:41
6,643
-7
29 Oct 2026, 19:08
6,650
-5
26 Oct 2026, 23:36
6,655
-7
23 Oct 2026, 17:18
6,662
-6
21 Oct 2026, 01:10
6,668
-5
17 Oct 2026, 17:46
6,673
-6
14 Oct 2026, 14:17
6,679
-5
11 Oct 2026, 03:58
6,684
-11
5 Oct 2026, 06:40
6,695
-18
27 Sept 2026, 00:37
6,713
-20
15 Sept 2026, 03:21
6,733
-1
11 Sept 2026, 16:19
6,734
-5
7 Sept 2026, 11:00
6,739
-10
2 Sept 2026, 15:25
6,749
-12
30 Aug 2026, 22:15
6,761
-5
27 Aug 2026, 20:03
6,766
-6
24 Aug 2026, 14:49
6,772
-7
20 Aug 2026, 14:56
6,779
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
65
Videos
2
Links
140
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
334 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👀
334
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 334 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
лол, уже год прошел с нашего последнего поста
сразу скажу - ничего вам продавать не будем, просто немного расскажем о результатах наших учеников.
в общем, мы набрали группу около 70-80 человек, в итоге в общем было получено около 30-40 офферов на зп в 2000-2500$, но оффер не значит трудоустройство
многие ребята отказывались из-за того что 1) гибрид/офис; 2) ниша не подходила (например, igaming и прочее)
и реальны…
Сегодня, в 18:00 MSK, через 2 часа, мы закрываем продажи
И идём на 2 месяца гриндить зарплату в 2500-3000 долларов, как раз к осенней оттепели рынка вакансий.
Тариф "QA базовый" - 600 USD или 47,999 рублей
💸 Тариф "QA зарплатный" - 800 USD или 63,499 рублей
Вся информация про обучение - https://teletype.in/@how_to_code_web3/QA_course
Для оплаты пишите в личку "обучQA" - @clor1n3
How to Code (а как?) pinned «🍄 Мы объявляем о старте продаж на первый поток нашей школы по QA-тестированию На этом обучении за 2 месяца мы научим вас с полного нуля до QA-тестировщика с зарплатой в 150-200к рублей. Все детали по обучению мы расписали в отдельной статье. В ней разобрали…»
🍄 Мы объявляем о старте продаж на первый поток нашей школы по QA-тестированию
На этом обучении за 2 месяца мы научим вас с полного нуля до QA-тестировщика с зарплатой в 150-200к рублей.
Все детали по обучению мы расписали в отдельной статье. В ней разобрали следующие темы:
- Что такое QA-тестирование?
- Сколько платят QA-тестировщикам?
- Почему вообще платят QA-тестировщикам?
- 🔥 Зачем вам обучаться QA-тестированию…
Всем привет
Через 15 минут закроем доступ к каналу, где в 18:00 MSK проведем вебинар "Как стать тестировщиком за 2 месяца"
Успевайте - https://t.me/+LS7Db7GJQAUxOTEy
Всё
В общем, попросили в комментариях пообщаться с учениками Влада.
Мы прислушались и в комментах вы можете задать им любые вопросы.
@fancy_kinguin - Илья
@dashqa_engineer - Даша
@Davcost9n - Вадим
Сразу скажем, что некоторые ребята сидят с левых аккаунтов, так как компании не очень любят "вкатунов".
Прошу всех в комментарии 👇
Немного разъясним ситуацию
Мы не просто будем вам продавать продукт, а проведём информативный текстовый вебинар на тему "Как стать QA-инженером за 2 месяца" с кучей полезной информации.
Поэтому даже если вы не хотите обучаться у нас, всё равно рекомендуем посетить мероприятие.
Вебинар пройдёт в закрытом канале. Скоро закроем доступ.
Кейсы наших прошлых учеников
Мы пообщались с некоторыми учениками Влада, которые проходили у него менторство. Задали им несколько вопросов про путь в QA: что было сложно, сколько ушло времени и какую ЗП они в итоге выбили. В общем, читайте.
Первый - Вадим.
Раньше он учился в МАИ и профессионально играл в CS. Потом ушёл в крипту: писал небольшие Python-скрипты под прокрут проектов. На старте обучения было тяжело - …
Отдельно хотим отметить тот факт, что сейчас - буквально самый лучший момент для того, чтобы начать обучаться QA.
Если начать обучаться в августе, то в октябре вы уже будете ходить на собеседования. А октябрь - это пик по количеству вакансий. И получить оффер будет сильно проще чем в том же июле.
А в ноябре-декабре снова будет наблюдаться "медвежка" из-за новогодних праздников.
Продажи обучения будут проходить в э…
Твой план c cегодняшнего дня до устройства на зп 150-200к рублей.
Привет. Сейчас мы распишем для тебя чёткий план, следуя которому ты сможешь выйти на свою первую зарплату. Итак, следите за руками:
1) Мы запускаем обучение примерно через неделю. Допустим, 1 августа.
2) И начиная с этого дня мы будет очень активно в течение 2 месяцев проходить теорию по QA-тестированию и по собеседованиям. И закончим примерно 1 окт…
Повторяем еще раз
Продажи пройдут в закрытом канале. Подпишитесь на него.
24 июля, 18:00 MSK, проведём вебинар "Как стать Middle QA-тестировщиком", а в конце откроем продажи.
Мест на обучение будет мало.
Обучение "Middle QA Engineer за 2 месяца". Что внутри?
Наш обуч будет состоять из 8 обширных блоков, после которых получится устроиться на Middle QA c зп 150,000 - 200,000 рублей.
1. Чем занимаются тестировщики + теория тестирования
Здесь мы плавно и без боли вкатимся в нишу. Узнаем, как правильно обучаться, как вести конспекты. Изучим сильную базу по теории QA. И уже на первой неделе попробуем себя на практике - …
👀21
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @how_to_code_web3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Небольшой опрос, чтобы понимать настроение аудитории
Я уже работаю QA-тестировщиком6%
Я прохожу собеседования на QA3%
Я в процессе обучения на QA11%
Я хочу начать учиться на QA41%
Мне не интересен QA38%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2025 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@how_to_code_web3 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@fancy_kinguin named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 4 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
криптапиражок @cryppi · 30,040 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
BIG BALLS BIRDS @big_balls_birds · 19,116 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“How to Code (а как?)” (@how_to_code_web3), 6,633 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/how_to_code_web3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.