The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If it remains inactive in the next 7 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.

Channel
Страшные истории. Horror
@horror100
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
261subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001095724092 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @horror100 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/horror100 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 261 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 260 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 260 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 12 April 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If it remains inactive in the next 19 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If it remains inactive in the next 29 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
Не знаю, насколько это хардкор, но я сейчас смотрела видео в местном паблике, где четверо малолеток избили девушку-таксистку, нормально так избили, по лицу попипинали, читала комменты и вспомнила, как в 90-х их бы наказали. Я из Сиба, с Первомайки, кстати, девушку избили в том же районе. Так вот, когда я была подростком, мы там жили и никогда ничего не боялись, могли гулять хоть всю ночь, нас родители не контролирова…
Сказка о слепом художнике | Русудан Алмазова К сорока он почти перестал различать цвета. Пил таблетки и капли – напрасно, не стало лучше. Доктора разводили руками: тяжёлый случай. Мир чернел по краям и стремительно выцветал. В сорок два он смирился. Распродал свои холсты, сжёг засохшие кисти и запил, не зная меры: нелегко выбирать между ядом и револьвером, легче горькой залить ощущение пустоты. Он отвадил друзей, …
Бегут по небу кошки — на шерстке дождь несут. Стоит внизу сторожка в реликтовом лесу. Сквозь щели ветер свищет, горит в окошках тьма — Сто лет иль целых тыщу здесь жил какой-то маг. Он был, конечно, темный — никак не светлый, нет. Из черной толщи дерна взывал явиться смерть. И смерть ползла к коленям в обличии лисы, В обличии оленя, как нерожденный сын, Летела будто ворон из преисподних врат — Спешила юркнуть в воро…
Мы работаем в ставках на спорт более 2 лет, присоединяйтесь к нам в канал и будем вместе разорять букмекеров. @ANALITIK_PROO
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
FAKE!! OR NOT? Бред VS Реальность Сможешь отличить? Проверь >>> @hareramapanorama
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @horror100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 907,211 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@horror100 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Страшные истории. Horror” (@horror100), 261 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/horror100.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.