в актуальной версии 11 винды если ткнуться в устройства и принтеры то перебросит в новые настройки и устройства там будут а принтеры нет, ну или не на виду (... привычно повторило эхо) если вам искать принтеры то набирайте в новых настройках слово принтер в строке поиска.

Channel
копыто и торт
@hoof_and_cake
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001974473521 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hoof_and_cake |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hoof_and_cake |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 54 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 53 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 52 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 53 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 53 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 52 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 67.2%
- avg views ÷ 54 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 36.3
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.36%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (30 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 508 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#веложуть посмотрел велотехнические ролики на youtube... и складывается впечатление что что вел в стоке до 100тр не стоит внимания ну или так... дешёвых комплектующих достойных внимания не существует. конкретика мне нужно седло, есть некие хотелки... довольно жесткое узкое и геометрия вот геометрию не могу сформулировать... т.е. мое нынешнее нет возможности поднять выше какого то положения становится неудобно, хочет…
#веложуть бабушка попала под паровоз, и после того как ее починили стала почти такая-же как до аварии но только стала избивать чайники со свистком... вот и я так-же после падения так-же к пешеходам которые мочатся предо мной на дороге отношусь... и нет когда ты едешь 20-25км/ч и тебе на встречу выбигает или выезжает некто и идет на таран, это не дилемма заключённого, хотя и похожа по форме... это скорее дилемма с…
в качестве эксперимента сварил в рисоварке 100г "15 минутной" (медленной) овсянки потратил 8.5г газа... наверное в неопрене газа потратилось бы меньше, потомоу, что здесь не закипятить, а варить 15 минут ну и если крышку вставлять правильно пар через щели не выходит, зря наговаривал
Posted without readable text
👍1
Так, 20-летняя москвичка после недельного интенсива с групповым давлением и телесными практиками получила нервный срыв, собиралась наложить на себя руки, но всё же нашла силы пойти к врачу-психиатру. Ещё одна жительница Москвы, вернувшись с ретрита, отдалилась от мужа и друзей, ушла с работы, а потом стала говорить, что «слышит чужие мысли» и «установила связь с космосом». Женщину экстренно госпитализировали в психбо…
❤2
насколько Стругацкие были знакомы с западной фантастикой? Гарри Гаррисон "Мир смерти" — 1960 (в СССР 1972) Стругацкие "Беспокойство" — 1965 и "Улитка на склоне" — 1966 ... мне Беспокойство нравится больше Улитки, которая imho тяжелее... этакий вдохновенный гон, в отличи от причесанной Улитки... ну и на момент 22-23 года когда перечитывал, наверное единственная книга Стругацких которую я бы оставил в своей библиотеке…
❤1
— подскажите пожалуйста подходит ли данный фильтр на модель пылесоса XXX? — Мы поможем вам адаптировать, этот продукт если был заказан через нас покупателем (ц) озон
#веложуть если вам кажется что люди вокруг злые и черствые, то предлагаю просто прилечь где-ни будь на тротуаре можно без велика... подойдут спросят не нужна ли помощь (скорая, милиция) помочь подняться ... как-то в 18 или 19 кажется году, я увидел в мокром весеннем парке что-то интересное и полез фотографировать, за спиной оставил велик, он стоял не устойчиво и упал.. ну вот я вылезаю из кустов немного грязный (ко…
❤1
#веложуть как то сегодня полкатушки не задались 1. бы зло облаян, полноразмерной собакой, поводка чуть-чуть не хватило, чтобы уводить под колеса, собака ты чего! не мелкой крысятиной, а красивым умным зверем. 2. лобовой таран с самокатчиком, с которым мы может и разъехались бы но он затормозил поставив самокат боком... гидравлические тормоза рулят... но никаких покрышек не хватит, в прошлый раз мне подросток под коле…
👀1👍1
берите модель 2025/26 года ради психологического комфорта (ц) #AI от гула. разговаривали про покрышки для велтика
версии вурдалачьего понимания: 1. ты паук, ты глаз бури 2. быть собой - значит быть далеко от смерти 3. дихотомия: смерь на кольцевой или вечная жизнь на Черкизоне 4. карта примерно 50х годов, сейчас прорыли много новых нор, нет доказательств что все ведут к смерти. 5. в школенные годы я жил на станции осознание, но иногда ходил домой через станцию грех (Комсомольская), а вот сейчас живу на неотмеченной части красной…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @hoof_and_cake. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 338,487 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“копыто и торт” (@hoof_and_cake), 54 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hoof_and_cake.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.