和你Fake Channel已確定係David開設 @hongkongpolice_tg
Channel
200人萬抗爭頻道
@hongkongpolice_tg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
36subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001402065599 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hongkongpolice_tg |
| Created | Between 1 October 2018 and 18 August 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hongkongpolice_tg |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:19 | 36 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 37 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:20 | 37 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 18 August 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 September 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Contact, posted without a caption
david哥係我偶像黎😂
你哋班分化撚咁叻 就快啲過嚟私9我 @hongkongpolice_tg
Channel name was changed to «200人萬抗爭頻道»
Channel name was changed to «《李國永》實錄»
各位傳媒朋友 我今日會喺太子站做show 各位傳媒朋友影我記得影靚仔啲🤗 另外 有人話乜嘢罷鐵 我今日會繼續搭鐵 #david #我今日又做show @hongkongpolice_tg
李國永先生 #david #大家係咪好好奇我叫乜名 @hongkongpolice_tg
既然你唔係david 咁點解你會講啲咁嘅嘢? david 煽動在場人士慘未經批准集結 #我又犯法啦 #犯法實錄 @hongkongpolice_tg
david 你識唔識轉發? 白卡仔淨係識複製粘貼 @hongkongpolice_tg
david 哥 我今次我支持你 @hongkongpolice_tg
信任到人比得個新增用戶佢 @hongkongpolice_tg
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hongkongpolice_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
david (周柏豪) 係咪白卡仔同埋戇鳩
- 係 呢樣野係無可否認91%
- 唔係😡9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
司令係咪on9?
- 緊係啦,睇佢d直播表情就知,唔講真係以為佢青山出嚟😂😂😂70%
- 唔係30%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2020 to 5 September 2020. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@hongkongpolice_tg named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“200人萬抗爭頻道” (@hongkongpolice_tg), 36 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hongkongpolice_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.