Channel
@hongdengqu999
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
377subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001964878241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hongdengqu999 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hongdengqu999 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 377 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 379 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 381 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 386 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 389 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 391 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 391 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 12 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
24 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 29.2% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 29.2% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2024 to 6 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
👄近期停业装修中，老板们静候佳音💕
👏7🍌2❤1🌭1
重磅消息 🐤万花楼国际会所🐤 🫕夜班的兄弟们有福了本公司决定👉以前五点下班延长至九点，提前预约哦🫕 💋300一次，400两次💋 专车接送🚗 让您在迪拜不再孤单是我们的职责、您的满意就对我们最大的认🉑 包白1000 可🏨送酒店 可上门💃🏻 可约酒局🍺 在线滴滴🛫您的私人订制管家 💕妈咪✈️: @wanhualou88 ☎️24小时热线0547355625
❤1👍1
空场中😍😍😍😍😍😍
🔥2💋1
营业中😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍
❤1👍1
空场中😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍
💓有你陪伴，慢慢长夜不在无眠，有你陪伴缘分天空不再单，💓💗 妈咪飞机: @wanhualou88 ☎️24小时热线+971547355625 🍔点击置顶可查看所有妹子照片
学妹多，房间多空场中欢迎骚扰…………😍😍😍
学妹多，房间多空场中欢迎骚扰…………😍😍😍
全员在岗🎉🎉颜值在线 ❤️任君挑选 老板们 周末出来嗨皮啦
👍2❤1
新到小妹，首飞想做第一的提前预定，手慢无😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 🦋• 𝐇𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭身高/167 🦋• 𝐖𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭体重/45 ▫️可纯可蜜 洋气精致时尚 ▫️你的性感小野猫 ▫️高挑长腿气质清纯 ▫️皮肤雪白 天然无整 🎬 🙏🙏🙏啊治曼万花楼国际会所🙏🙏 热线✈️：@wanhualou88
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @hongdengqu999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hongdengqu999 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍵🍵万花楼🇻🇳（阿吉曼别墅🏡” (@hongdengqu999), 377 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hongdengqu999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.