Channel
@hongchuni
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
120subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001594495346 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hongchuni |
| Description | 코인 정보 공유(주로 NFT느프트와 디파이), 에어드랍, 폐지줍기, 테스트넷 정보 등 각종 잡다구리한 정보 나눔의 공간 *후원/기부 받아요(그지입니둥ㅠ)-> 트론체인 트론 TMFnricddp8N6ft8GTYEVu19tnVyDeSvAW 개인dm 은 @suyeonhong 으로 주세요! |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hongchuni |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 120 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 120 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (18 May 2025 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 11 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
https://www.youtube.com/live/iIlqG0untYM?si=mGLScIhRZbONHVm4 트럼프 부정선거 관련 연설 2020년부터 중국이 개입한 증거가 있음. whitehouse.gov 인가 여기에 다 증거공개했다함. 2억명이상의 미국유권자 정보가 털림. 정치성향까지..(중국, 러시아, 북한 그외 국가에 의해서) 미국 전자개표기와 우편투표시스템은 해킹과 조작 오염에 취약하다고 함.(우리나라도 같은상황이라 난 생각함) 우리나라 5천만밖에 안되는데 이미 다털렸겠네 ㅠ 죽은사람, 존재하지 않는 시민 등 비유권자들 28만표이상 투효했다함.(2020선거인지 뭐 미국내 다른주인지 가물가물함..붕어라 못외움) 이런 중국의 개입은 다시는 없게끔 바로 강력한 조치를 취한다고 함. 세이브어메리카액트(법안) 통과시켜달라 마지막으로 호소. …
7~8월에 상원 본회의가 통과되야 클래리티 진짜 통과.. 6월까진 죽쑬듯 ㅜ 난 마지막 사나이 테스트라고 생각한다.. 저거 통과되면 이제 코인살기회 없다고 생각함. 인생일대 마지막 기회가 될 수도 있음. (이상 개소리였다!)
https://youtu.be/R2iJuKoFI7M?si=SnupawwQUq_HwS1f
https://youtu.be/iTa9sL5gpTw?si=3JSMBYC57f3nmPY3 옴청 유용하다!
어제꾼 꿈인데.. 비트관련은 아니고 (개꿈같긴한데🤒) 안좋은 적당히 큰 파도가 몰려오고 있었고 메시지를 받았는데(사이비 교주같네 오해하지마셈요) 정수용알약(아쿠아탭스 같은거) 사라는 그런 내용이었음. 어차피 아쿠아탭스는 재난상황에서 물 정화시켜서 마시는거니 일단 한개 시켰음 (전쟁나면 뭐 어차피 살기는 힘들거라고 생각함) 솔직히 지금 미국이 이란치는 마당에 막말로 중국이 대만침공하고 북한이 남한침공하면 3차대전 나는거 아닌가..? 이건 물론 최악의 시나리오지만.. #꿈 #재난꿈
✔️Base 에어드롭 대비 체크리스트 26년도 기대주 중 하나는 여전히 Base 최근 스탠스를 보면 “실사용자 + 빌더 구분” 가능성이 높아 보입니다. 아래 항목들은 한번 점검해보세요! 1️⃣ Builder 역할 만들기 (컨트랙트 배포) • https://owlto.finance/deploy?chain=base • 스마트컨트랙트 1개 이상 배포 • 10개 이상 배포자는 현재 약 9천 명 수준 → 차별화 구간 가능성 👀 2️⃣ Builder Badge 클레임 • https://guild.xyz/base/builders-founders • 지갑 + 소셜 연결 • 배포 수량에 따라 역할(롤) 획득 3️⃣ 온체인 활동 Badge 클레임 • https://guild.xyz/base/onchain 조건 예시: - 최근 30일 내 1회 이상 트랜잭…
중국(금은사재기 희토류 독점, 위안화를 세계화폐로 만들려함) vs 미국(미국 달러 패권이 약화되면서 달러 겁나 찍어내서 가치는 떨어진 상태이나 달러패권을 유지할려고 하겠지..?) 에너지전쟁, 화폐전쟁중.. 코인쪽도 차트만 볼 수 없는 시장이 되어버린지 오래된 느낌 자산시장 대폭락 나와서 싹다 죽이고 코인시장 오르지 않을까..? 미국이 부채갚을려면 비트값 상승시켜서 값는방법 밖에 없음 중국이 금사재기한것도 무력화 시키고 디지털 달라나 디지털화폐 시대로 가는거지.. 아마 물밑작업으론 디지털 플랫폼 구상은 이미 끝났을 수 있음 디지털 환경이 활성화 되려면 현실환경을 죽여야함 이게 예를 들면 코로나 같은 역병터트려서 인간들을 디지털 세계로 밀어넣을 수도 있고 주식코인등 자산시장 대폭락시켜서 디지털 금융환경으로 밀어넣을 수도 있다고 생각함 …
< 메마 모바일 포인트 수령 > (뒷북) 메마 모바일 앱 실행-> 하단 우측 보상 클릭-> 코드입력하면 서로 서로 포인트 얻음(현재 시간으로 7일 18시간 남음) 내 레퍼럴: ZS5HRN https://metamask.io/ko/rewards?referral=ZS5HRN&_branch_match_id=1540279261557039547&_branch_referrer=H4sIAAAAAAAAA8soKSkottLXz8nMy9bLTS1JzE0sztbLzNcvSi1PLEopti9KTUstKkrMsY0KNvUI8lOrgwhk5qXHJxXllxenFtm6pqSnAgD82X%2BYSAAAAA%3D%3D #메타마스크포인트 #메마포인트 #airdrop
< 260110 오늘 한 것 > 바낸 usd1 3천불 넣음(20%이자) usdt말고 usdc로 바꿈(써클이 더 안전) #usd1 #usdc
테러 개떡상 할거같은데.. 솔직히 비트는 당분간은 횡보 or 하락 할거같음. #테더롱 #usdtlong #달러롱 #usdclong
이더 뒤질거같은데 지금상승 일시적 가짜상승이라고봄(아님 말고..ㅇㅅㅇ) 테더 개떡상 하지 않을까? #이더리움숏 #테더롱
바낸 소문이 않좋네.. 혹시 모르니 바낸에 자금있는사람들 딴데로 옮겨놓으셈 ㄱㄱ 난 소액 오켁스로 튐 #바낸런 #바낸캄보디아자금동결소문 #바이낸스 #binance
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hongchuni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,261,128 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“코냥이의 코인킁킁방” (@hongchuni), 120 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hongchuni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.