Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 170–177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 01:37
171
-1
23 Aug 2026, 02:53
172
-3
15 Aug 2026, 20:03
175
-1
8 Aug 2026, 13:47
176
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:13
176
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 3 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
461 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
125
27.1%
❤
100
21.7%
🔥
64
13.9%
🎉
37
8.03%
👍
32
6.94%
💯
31
6.72%
😍
30
6.51%
💋
13
2.82%
🍓
12
2.60%
⚡
7
1.52%
🍾
5
1.08%
🍌
3
0.651%
🌭
1
0.217%
👾
1
0.217%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 461 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2025 to 11 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем Привет!❤️🩹
Процесс необычной девочки гяру)
Пока лишь простой скетч, но впервые решила попробовать пропустить лицо через нейронку и вставить в арт, оно всё равно будет чуток другим, от нейронки не останется ничего ;)
❗️(Решила воспользоваться AI лишь в познавательных целях! То есть я не собираюсь пихать его в каждую работу. Отношусь к нему просто как к одному из инструментов для художника!)❗️
#скетч
°•. Всех с первым сентября!🍁 .•°
• сегодня хочу вас порадовать артом который делала совершенно недавно, в середине лета.
Пока больше нет никаких новых новостей, так что ваша задача немного полюбоваться работой ;)
"•.Конкурс проходил в этом тгк:
https://t.me/SailyAni
https://t.me/SailyAni
https://t.me/SailyAni
°•. Благодарю организаторов, за столь интересный конкурс! Я буду участвовать ещё в будущем) .•°
Всем привет!🤍
°спустя такое долгое время, я постепенно начинаю возвращаться к вам!✨°
. — Благодарю всех, кто не отписывался, может ждал нового поста, или моего возвращения <3.
• Кому интересно куда я пропала, то я в крации расскажу под постом, так как тут оправдываться не хочу. Как произошло так и произошло ;)
√'-. В общем, я продолжу выкладывать сюда свои арты, продолжу делиться событиями из своей жизни). Думаю…
🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂
• Сегодня итоги конкурса!
' Работы принимаются ровно, до 18:00
• А сами итоги в 19:00!
🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍
Призовых мест будет 🙂
Слишком хорошо все нарисовали))
И благодарю тех, кто участвует! 💗
#инфопост #конкурс
Чёт решила порисовать эту странную работу, и захотелось попробовать сделать стадики, с плановостью, с пространством) 🌟
Так что, скоро будут, ждите 🫡
•! Присутствует немного жестокости !•
#процесс #арт
🔥14🎉4🍾3❤2⚡1🍌1🍓1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @homeHOrii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
6
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
6
vacant every time we have ever looked
@homeHOrii named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hauschoco named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@kii_nekoo named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@kineko0o named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@monika_moondangg named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@ulwrikk named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@zozif_17 named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Я вернулась •,♱⋆’ 「Дом Hori」‘⋆♱,•” (@homeHOrii), 171 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/homeHOrii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.