Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Holy Runner/Бегу как могу

@holyrunner

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003831173478
TypeChannel
Username@holyrunner
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 12 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/holyrunner

Growth

112113112.59 Aug 2026, 05:16 — 113 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 06:30 — 113 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 22:31 — 112 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 05:169 Aug 2026, 22:31
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 112–113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 22:31112-1
9 Aug 2026, 06:30113no change
9 Aug 2026, 05:16113first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.8%
avg views ÷ 112 subscribers
Avg views / post
44.6
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (12 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total223
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

98 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5859.2%
🔥1717.3%
🍓88.16%
❤‍🔥55.10%
👏44.08%
🕊33.06%
👍22.04%
🆒11.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC24 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5🔥3👍1🆒1

9 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC27 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥51

21 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC74 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Зачем вообще нужен тренер? Многие думают, что тренер нужен только для того, чтобы составить план тренировок. На самом деле его главная задача совсем в другом. Я бы сказал так. Когда человек начинает работать с тренером, он делегирует ему две вещи. Первое это свою волю. В начале пути все мотивированы. Хочется бегать, тренироваться, ставить рекорды. Но проходит несколько недель. Усталость после работы, плохая по

🔥6

20 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC59 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В спорте есть одно очень важное понятие. Гипотеза. Гипотеза это предположение. Мы выбираем определенный путь и считаем, что именно он приведет нас к нужному результату. Бег не является точной наукой. Нет формулы, которая гарантирует успех каждому. Нельзя сказать, что если все будут бегать по 100 километров в неделю, то обязательно пробегут марафон за 3 часа. Или что три тренировки в неделю точно лучше пяти. Все эт

4

16 Jul 2026, 05:31 UTC59 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Фундамент бега Одна из самых главных ошибок в беге заключается в том, что человек почти каждую тренировку превращает в небольшое соревнование. Вышел на пробежку и сразу хочется показать хороший темп. Кажется, что если бежать быстрее, то и форма будет расти быстрее. Но на практике это работает наоборот. Джек Дэниелс в книге «От 800 метров до марафона» объясняет, что каждая тренировка должна иметь конкретную цель. Л

5🍓4

2 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC70 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4

28 Jun 2026, 10:59 UTC102 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Как я отношусь к питанию? Очень просто. Я не сижу на жестких диетах и не запрещаю себе любимую еду. Раз в неделю, иногда два, спокойно могу съесть бургер, пиццу или что-то еще. По четвергам у нас с сыном киновечер, и чипсы там тоже бывают. Но это не основа моего питания. Основа моего питания это нормальная еда. Каждый день я ем овсяную кашу на овсяном молоке без сахара. Дома мы вообще не используем сахар. На зав

4

28 Jun 2026, 10:41 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Так! Немного напишу про питание Я не нутрициолог и не совсем много понимаю, но базовое понимание по питанию у меня есть Еще важный момент я пример в питании) я ем все (почти все) Но вот одна фраза (нутрициолога с которым я работал) однажды в меня сильно засела «Питание это наше топливо, то чем мы питаемся влияет на то сколько мы будет ехать и как мы будем ехать! Мы определим каким топливом заправлять себя» Тема т

1

22 Jun 2026, 02:36 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4🕊3

20 Jun 2026, 15:12 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Цель тренировки не усталость. Цель тренировки адаптация. Я много бегаю в режиме где вообще нет усталости. Задача адаптироваться и развивать аэробную выносливость. За долгие годы тренировок, я могу пробежать марафон легким темпом и даже особо не устать. С темпом 5:30 например Да бег легкий на низком пульсе очень скучный (я часто слушаю книги или лекции) но именно такой бег делает нас выносливыми) Посмотрите на кар

1👍1

16 Jun 2026, 06:48 UTC69 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня проснулся очень рано) пришлось идти бегать 4 км разминка пульс до 135 2 км по 4:05 темп с повтором 5 раз 2 мин трусцы между интервалами Заминка 3 км

6🔥4👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @holyrunner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 507,905 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Holy Runner/Бегу как могу” (@holyrunner), 112 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/holyrunner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.