Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пресвятой Винникотт!

Channel

Пресвятой Винникотт!

@holy_winnicott

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

365subscribers

+45 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002400582941
TypeChannel
Username@holy_winnicott
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/holy_winnicott

Growth

320365342.57 August 2026 — 320 subscribers8 August 2026 — 320 subscribers15 August 2026 — 365 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 313–372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:04365+45
8 Aug 2026, 07:32320no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:58320first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.2%
avg views ÷ 365 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.5
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held11 (15 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total885
Reactions total52
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6390.0%
🔥68.57%
👍11.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @holy_winnicott. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC47 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️#понедельникпролюбовь Сегодня коротко: Без любви – все хуйня!❤️ Пресвятой Винникотт!

3

2 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC67 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Начался месяц-воскресенье лета 🍇 Когда уже чувствуется, что скоро понедельник, но пока все еще много спишь и вкусно ешь. Август – это успевать жить жизнь сегодня. Подборка очень августовских фото с пикника 📸 Пресвятой Винникотт!

4🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC90 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#рекомендасьён на выходные 💖 «Вместе до конца». Мини сериал из 8 серий о двадцатилетней женской дружбе Дебби и Джудит. Дебби – домохозяйка, которая забила на свою карьеру ради карьеры мужа, жена британского парламентера, все контролирует (так она думает) и живет в основном его жизнь. Находчивая и смелая. Джудит – вроде бы судебный бухгалтер, на самом деле – наемный убийца. Внезапно что-то идет не так у обеих подруг)

7🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 06:49 UTC80 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☕️ Ооо, даааа! Это я, как чайлдфри на целую неделю, подтверждаю)) #кофекорицачетверг пусть и у вас случится в тишине 🤎 Пресвятой Винникотт!

7

27 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Я сейчас:

  1. Я в процессе обучения50%
  2. Ничему не учусь33%
  3. Планирую/выбираю8%
  4. Поделюсь, чему учусь, в комментариях17%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC93 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Итак, продолжу про идентичность и успех. Идентичность – это та «посуда», в которую мы пытаемся налить достижения. Если она треснута, успех вытечет сквозь пальцы. В психологической практике я выделяю следующие слои: 📎Эго-идентичность (Ядро). Это ощущение непрерывности себя во времени. «Я – это тот же человек, что и вчера, даже если я изменился». Если она хрупкая, мы теряем себя в каждой новой роли и непонятно, где я

6

23 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC111 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☕️ Открытие лета: 🔥Эспрессо-тоник. 😍Бамбл на гранатовом соке. Это при том, что я консервативна и всегда пью горячий кофе с корицей. В любой день, чтобы не промахнуться и наверняка 😂 А у вас какие открытия, друзья? #кофекорицачетверг Пресвятой Винникотт!

5

22 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC107 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В последнее время много размышляю об идентичности. В психоанализе и современной психологии идентичность – это не константа, а живой, меняющийся ответ на вопрос «Кто я?». Когда мы не понимаем, кто мы, мы не знаем, куда именно идти, потому что не знаем, зачем. Идентичность (социальная) – это то, с чем мы идем в мир и что мы ему предъявляем: профессия, родитель, партнер, друг. Проблема в том, что мы часто отождествляе

7👍1

20 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC110 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️Всем привет! Сегодня #понедельникпролюбовь к успеху. Я задумалась об этом в контексте чемпионства в футболе. Но это было вчера, сегодня уже не актуально и ЧМ закончился. А тема актуальна во все времена. Штука в том, что мы не любим успех. Мы любим фантазию об успехе. А сам реальный успех, достижение, чаще всего, пугает. Вот главные «страшилки», сидящие в голове: 1. Страх одиночества (Меня возненавидят/бросят близ

6🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 14:56 UTC130 views18 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему у нас такие разные дети? Многие родители задаются этим вопросом. Все потому, что одинаковых условий не бывает, и потому что каждый ребенок рождается в разную психологическую реальность как семьи в целом, так и каждого родителя. 1. Разная позиция в семейной системе. Первый ребенок какое-то время был «центром вселенной». Второй рождается уже в мир, где есть соперник. Их бессознательные вопросы к родителям разн

18

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @holy_winnicott. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Я сейчас:

  1. Я в процессе обучения50%
  2. Ничему не учусь33%
  3. Планирую/выбираю8%
  4. Поделюсь, чему учусь, в комментариях17%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,103,705 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пресвятой Винникотт!” (@holy_winnicott), 365 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/holy_winnicott.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.